“Don’t fight the Fed” is an old investing mantra, suggesting that investments should align with the Federal Reserve’s monetary policies instead of against them. After assessing the impact of the People’s Bank of China’s (PBOC’s) deleveraging efforts and the potential impact ahead of its stimulative policies, we believe a key theme for 2019 will be “Don’t fight the PBOC.”
What Went Wrong With Chinese Equities in 2018
Before looking at 2019, let’s start by reflecting on 2018. The big surprise was the underperformance of Chinese equities. With both good corporate profitability growth and a good economy, why did Chinese equities fall so much?
The answer may lie with what central banks are doing. In China, I think stocks fell as a result of the deleveraging in its economy that started a year or two earlier. While there is a lot of time spent talking about short-term things like trade tensions and politics, my view is that we should really look at liquidity—that is, what central banks are doing to the markets.
In China, this deleveraging should have signaled something. Starting this summer, however, the PBOC cut short-term rates by 200 basis points. It was stimulative. It usually takes about six to twelve months to kick in, so in either the first or second quarter next year, I think we can expect a boost to Chinese assets and the country’s economic growth.
Shanghai Interbank Offered Rate (SHIBOR)1: Three Moves of at Least 2% Since 2014
Source: Bloomberg; Cornerstone Macro
Between now and then, there is going to be some uncertainty. First, we don't know when the stimulus will kick in. Second, there are trade tensions. And, third, with Chinese New Year falling in either January or February, sometimes it takes until March before we know what happened.
Markets tend not to like uncertainty, but I believe at least one of the stories of 2019 will be the rise of Chinese assets due to central bank easing.
No More “Boom! Boom!”, But Still Solid Growth
Looking forward, investors should get 8-10% GDP growth out of their minds, as I think China will more realistically see GDP growth closer to 4-5%. But the economy is large enough now that at 4% growth, companies can still grow profits at 10-20%, with some sectors growing at even higher rates.
Besides central bank policy, understanding the nature of the regulatory environment in New China is also important—not least because President Xi Jinping favors state-owned enterprises (SOEs)2. Policies that help SOEs tend to be negative for China's private companies as well as for foreign private companies doing business in China.
The direction of China’s economic policy has been uncertain, but in the last couple months, President Xi has signaled that he understands that private enterprise generates most of the jobs in China. That's a key component, but we will continue to watch this space. China is competing for our investment dollars, based on not just growth rates, but also regulatory climate, and it's a competitive world.
Don’t Fight the PBOC
Despite a growth slowdown and other market economic imbalances, the Chinese government has been doggedly pursuing a reduction in shadow financing. Small and medium-size companies are the major consumers of shadow financing. This raises the question: How can the government be stimulating, when at the same time, it’s trying to fix the imbalances in the country’s financial system – which is inherently not stimulative, especially for those companies that can actually drive growth?
My answer would be that there are other fiscal and regulatory steps that China is taking that I believe will be net stimulative. Although, close up, the story is much more complicated, at the big picture level, I believe it is a case of “Don’t fight the PBOC.”
To oversimplify the world economy, there are essentially two engines driving it: China and the U.S. If the Chinese growth rate does start to look a little bit more attractive six to twelve months from now or if the U.S. starts pushing forward, then I think that should help on the margin for commodity demand.
China Is the Biggest Single Contributor to Global Growth
Source: VanEck; Bloomberg; IMF World Economic Outlook
Shifting Bond and Equity Correlation
Looking beyond China, an interesting change has happened to the correlation between stocks and bonds in the U.S. This correlation has started to trend upwards. This means that using long-duration bonds as a shock absorber or hedge in a portfolio may become more difficult. Investors may need to look elsewhere for defensive positioning against equity risk.
Jan van Eck, CEO, shares his investment outlook.
1The Shanghai Interbank Offered Rate (or SHIBOR) is a daily reference rate based on the interest rates at which banks offer to lend unsecured funds to other banks in the Shanghai wholesale (or "interbank") money market.
2A state-owned enterprise (SOE) is a legal entity that is created by a government in order to partake in commercial activities on the government's behalf.
This content is published in the United States for residents of specified countries. Investors are subject to securities and tax regulations within their applicable jurisdictions that are not addressed in this content. Nothing in this content should be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell shares of any investment in any jurisdiction where the offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction, nor is it intended as investment, tax, financial, or legal advice. Investors should seek such professional advice for their particular situation and jurisdiction.
The views and opinions expressed are those of the author and are current as of the posting date. Commentaries are general in nature and should not be construed as investment advice. Opinions are subject to change with market conditions. All performance information is historical and is not a guarantee of future results.
Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward looking statements, which do not reflect actual results. Information provided by third-party sources are believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed.
Please note that Van Eck Securities Corporation offers investment products that invest in the asset class((es)) mentioned in this video.
International investing involves additional risks, which include greater market volatility, the availability of less reliable financial information, higher transactional and custody costs, taxation by foreign governments, decreased market liquidity, and political instability. Changes in currency exchange rates may negatively impact an investment's return. Investments in emerging markets securities are subject to elevated risks, which include, among others, expropriation, confiscatory taxation, issues with repatriation of investment income, limitations of foreign ownership, political instability, armed conflict, and social instability.
All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest. As with any investment strategy, there is no guarantee that investment objectives will be met and investors may lose money. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss in a declining market. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. An investor should consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the investment company carefully before investing. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Van Eck Securities Corporation. © 2018 Van Eck Securities Corporation.
Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.