# Do Dividend-Paying Stocks Make Better Investments?

Marotta on Money
317 Followers

## Summary

• Investors mistakenly believe that dividend-paying stocks make better investments.
• Dividend stocks are usually on the value end of the spectrum, which does make better investments.
• Simply maximizing dividends may result in minimizing appreciation.

Investors mistakenly believe that dividend-paying stocks make better investments. A company paying dividends is thought to have a more concrete valuation and the dividends are beloved by retirees who can visually see the dividends supporting their withdrawals. In other words, dividends are loved because you can take your dividends to the bank and spend them.

The math and science of factor investing are a little more complicated than this simplistic thinking though.

You can calculate a stock's dividend yield by dividing the annual dividend payout by the stock's current price. Dividend stocks are those that have a high dividend yield.

You can calculate a stock's price per earnings or P/E ratio by dividing the stock's current price by the historical or expected earnings. Value stocks are those that have a P/E ratio.

Dividend stocks are usually on the value end of the spectrum. For this reason, value and dividend-paying stocks often move in sync with one another. But all things being equal, it is value stocks which outperform, not dividend-paying stocks.

Consider three stocks with the following characteristics:

## Value Stock V

• \$28 per share price
• \$3 per share earnings
• \$1 per share annual dividend payout

And, therefore, the following metrics:

• 3.57% dividend yield (\$1 / \$28)
• 9.3 P/E ratio (\$28 / \$3)

## Blend Stock B

• \$28 per share price
• \$2 per share earnings
• \$1 per share annual dividend payout

And, therefore, the following metrics:

• 3.57% dividend yield (\$1 / \$28)
• 14.0 P/E ratio (\$28 / \$2)

## Growth Stock G

• \$28 per share price
• \$1 per share earnings
• \$1 per share annual dividend payout

And, therefore, the following metrics:

• 3.57% dividend yield (\$1 / \$28)
• 28.0 P/E ratio (\$28 / \$1)

Notice that although all three stocks have the same dividend yield (3.75%), they have very different P/E ratios ranging from a very low 9.3 to a very high 28.0. The lower the price per earnings, the more potential there is for the company to reinvest their earnings into strategies that eventually increase their share price. The higher the price per earnings, the more the company needs to grow their earnings in order to justify their current share price.

These three stocks illustrate that measuring a stock simply by its dividend yield fails to take the important consideration of earnings into account. The price per earnings is a more significant measure for a stock's future return than dividend yield.

Valuation is one of the long-term factors which differentiate the expected future mean return. Value stocks generally do better than growth stocks. And valuations compared with historical averages can help investors adjust static portfolios dynamically.

JPMorgan puts out a nice Guide to the Markets each quarter. This graph is page 12 of the fourth quarter 2018 Guide to the Markets.

As this graph suggests maximizing dividends may result in minimizing appreciation. Utilities, Real Estate, and Communication Services may have the highest dividend yields, but they also have the lowest capital appreciation.

Additionally, even though qualified dividends are taxed at the long-term capital gain rates, ordinary dividends are not qualified and subject to ordinary income tax rates instead making them a more costly way of being paid.

For all of these reasons, our recommended investment strategy does not focus on dividend-paying stocks.

317 Followers
David John Marotta CFP, AIF, is President of Marotta Wealth Management, Inc. providing fee-only financial planning and wealth management at www.emarotta.com and blogging at www.marottaonmoney.com.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: Both the authors and the clients we manage often invest in the investments mentioned in these articles.