Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

A Special Situation Set Up By Bristol-Myers Squibb's Offer For Celgene

Feb. 11, 2019 1:19 PM ETBristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY), CELG62 Comments
Richard Berger profile picture
Richard Berger
10.8K Followers

Summary

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb tendered an offer for Celgene Corporation.
  • The markets currently are pricing a large discount for the uncertainty of shareholder approval into the deal value.
  • This uncertainty discount provides a special situation for investors to realize yield rates >28% on net cash invested.
  • I have structured the investment such that it can avoid exposure to the shareholder and regulatory risks by closing prior to the shareholder votes of 4/12/19.
  • Looking for more? I update all of my investing ideas and strategies to members of Engineered Income Investing. Start your free trial today »

Nature delivers some spectacular special situations from time to time. These provide experiences rarely encountered. We are enriched by finding them. Special situation investing is a class of opportunities that arises from a departure of the normal course of business and trading. Mergers, acquisitions, activist investors, turnarounds, and some financing launches are examples of a departure from the natural day-to-day world. These present us with targeted ways to profit from their development and presence over a limited time.

The Situation

On January 3, 2019, Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE:BMY) tendered a bid for Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ:CELG). The offer boils down to each Celgene share receiving $50.00 in cash, one share of BMY ($50.05 at close 2/7/19), and a contingent value right ("CVR") worth $9 cash if specified Celgene matters in its pipeline are met. This values the deal for a total buyout offer of $100.05 to $109.05 per share for CELG holders.

The Deal Highlights

The merger will position BMY as the top oncology player, a top five immunology company, and the top cardiovascular player in biotech. The combined company will have a pipeline which includes six near product launches pending over the next 24 months. Together, these represent more than $15 billion in potential revenue per company estimates.

Bristol also expects to achieve $2.5 billion in synergies via combining the sales, general, and administrative costs, the R&D, and the manufacturing functions of the two companies. BMY, pro forma, projects 2020 results boosting EPS 40% due to this accretive growth from the pipeline products and operational synergy savings.

The offer is attractive to CELG at over 50% premium to market and removing the FDA approval risk for the three products in Celgene's pipeline. The $9 CVG is based on the FDA approval of these three products, including ozanimod (by December 31, 2020), liso-cel (JCAR017) (by December 31, 2020) and bb2121 (by March 31, 2021). The CVG

Your subscription includes:

  • Exclusive access to E.I.I. Strategy, developed to boost cash income & yield from quality dividends while reducing (but never fully eliminating) market risk.
  • 5+ monthly opportunities using specific strategies and trade pricing to enter/hold/exit according to value, including covered option writing. + dozens of quick look ideas.
  • Personal access to the winner of Seeking Alpha's prestigious Outstanding Performance Award.

This article was written by

Richard Berger profile picture
10.8K Followers
Mr. Berger is the creator and developer of the YDP screening tool, a chart system and its analysis for screening and monitoring dividend income equity investments. The recipient of Seeking Alpha's Outstanding Performance Award, he also has been Seeking Alpha's #3 ranked Author for Income Investing Strategy & #4 for Utilities. 20 years of sitting in the board room gives me unique insights into Oil & Gas investments and corporate deal making in general. Additionally, he offers a Subscription Service  for Value & Income investors, boosting income while reducing market risk using covered option writing on a dividend income equity portfolio. Residing in Brazil gives me a local's inside view on the pulse of its economy, politics, investment climate and breaking news. A view of my front yard is available here.A former Chief Operating Officer, Director, Vice President and General Manger of Oil and Gas for Southern Pacific's Oil and Gas Operations, Business owner, geologist, and cribbage player, I've been an investor for over 48 years (started young at 13) and learned my lessons the way that makes them stick, by hard knocks and both big and little mistakes. Hopefully I can share some of those lessons with others.I am an American expatriate that decided to retire at age 57 in 2009 and now live in Brazil. As an early retiree I invest for income and manage portfolio risk by screening for strong and reliable historic data along with favorable fundamental and technical current trends.I spend 6 months/year living at home in Brazil and 6 months/year traveling the world. I have structured my financial positions so that I live virtually tax free with much of my income exempt from US tax since I live ex patriot and a lot of my US derived income over the annual ex-patriate exemptions is held in my tax free ROTH and tax deferred IRA/SIMPLE plans. This enables my tax savings to pay for my 6 months of annual traveling :) . My investing is for income and appreciation with a balance of low to moderate short term risk and low long term risk. To accomplish this I use quality dividend payors with a long track record of steady or increasing dividends along with slowly appreciating equity prices. I target a 8 to 15 % yield and almost exclusively require a minimum history of 5 years of steady/increasing dividends and no decreases in dividend ever or at least past 10 years. I diversify through sector, country and currency unit the stocks are traded in, and security type (equity, royalty trust, REIT, etf, and ADRs). I use covered call writing to enhance my portfolio yield with no added risk. In fact, it lowers the risk substantially. Once I identify a stock I want to own and an entry price for it, I write cash covered puts at or below that entry price (with a minimum of 1%/month time premium. Thus i obtain at least a 12% annualized yield before compounding just from the option premium. Likewise, I use the sale of cash covered puts to generate income and and generally get an entry point at 5 to 10% below my acceptable entry level price if/when the put stock does get presented. Thus my strategy provides a 12% pre compound yield on cash and entry into stock purchases at a 5 to 10% discount from "retail". Because I only select stocks that I am willing to hold long term for their reliable dividend yields, I am not concerned much with market volatility or short/midterm risk. Indeed, market volatility is my friend since it increases the premiums paid on the options I sell. I also selectively sell covered calls on positions I hold long so as to add to my yield that way while not taking on any additional risk.This strategy has kept me happily living off my portfolio income and traveling 1/2 the year while my portfolio has been slowly increasing in value even after my harvesting income for living expenses. As of December 2020, I am no longer writing for Seeking Alpha. If you would like to contact me with questions about my work or subscription service, please leave me a message on this site or email me at boater805@gmail.com

Analyst’s Disclosure: I am/we are long CELG. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (62)

g
You buys yer ticket, you takes yer ride. Me? Long CELG through and including the merger. Or not.
User 63931 profile picture
Does anyone know of a reason BMY and CELG were down on an up market today? Most of my other biotech stocks were up. I did not see any (bad) news, nor any rumors. Just wondering if anyone saw something I missed. Thanks, Bill
Richard Berger profile picture
User 63931,

I think it fair to say that both BMY and CELG are now strongly detached from the market and trading almost solely on the internal basis of the pending deal and issues surrounding it. Yes, an extreme market move signaling a broad change in valuation basis for the whole market (as might happen with a total collapse or total long term solution to trade disputes) could even effect these two in the midst of their mutual tango. However, largely, their music is unique to the the two of them for the next 2 months. Today's trading is within the normal random walk of their respective narrow trading ranges as the deal pends.

Richard
Richard Berger profile picture
suzangel5,

CELG has indeed survived fine without a partner. However, BMY will certainly provide CELG a broader set of current products and double the size of the pipeline products on the way to market via FDA review.

BMY has offered somewhat over double the market pre-offer market price of CELG, rewarding CELG holders with a very substantial bonus above market. While it certainly is possible that CELG might be trading for over $100 within the next 2 months if the deal fails, it is very unlikely.. Therefore, I think that most reasonable people will see the BMY offer as good or even generous. Celgene holders even continue to benefit from BMY development of new products since the structure gives them 1.4X shares of the new merged company in addition to the cash and CVR instrument.

In your view, how long would it realistically take in the event of a failed deal for CE:G tp be trading above $110 on the open markets with little doubt.

Richard
s
I disagree. I think it's likely they will trade above $100, as they did in 2017. It's clear CELG doesn't need BMY with their strong pipeline, and now with their win over Dr. Reddys patent case for Revlimid. BMY needs CELG. This deal is poor management on CELG part. If the deal fails, CELG stock would go down of course, but that wouldn't be lasting.
Richard Berger profile picture
suzangel5,

Yes, but what time frame to you envision CELG rising above $100 again if the deal should fail?

If it takes 2 or 3 years, you could take your $100 NOW and put it in some other promising investment(s) and a 50% (identical rally) by that would end with $200 by the same end period, leaving your $100 CELG still a bad choice. Time is of the essence.

Richard
s
I'm in no rush. I still believe CELG is worth a lot more than what they are selling themselves for and I'm thinking long term.
s
I still believe CELG does not need BMS. They will fair very well on their own. Selling themselves is selling themselves very short.
TradingPlacess profile picture
Then load up on Bmy. Management is much better and will handle the assets properly. No brainer
Richard Berger profile picture
Dave Schneider,

Certainly the past is no guarantee of the future. However,, the past is the ONLY THING we have to develop a future view. The past may have subtleties to warn of inflection points. I do watch for those as part of my analysis. For instance, for dividend stocks (my main focus), I monitor cash flows and their trends as the canary in the coal mine to dividend safety.

This current idea is a very short term thesis. We need look at risk of deal or no deal. If a deal, then zero risk. If no deal, then timing of no deal realization is of interest. Again, short ter with exit very early in the deal make/break timeline already speaks to that. As to broken deal pricing, I have discussed it in some detail and my reasoning in the article.

Anything discussion, with a well stated thesis, reasoning, and supporting data is welcome. Any thing that simply says "I disagree" is noted but of no value to our discussion and I will not engage it.

Richard
Dave Schneider profile picture
Sometimes the future is not a mirror image of the past.
TradingPlacess profile picture
Right now Celgene is worth about 100. Crv is 9 but that will trade at 4. Putting a 104 value. Now if BMY trades up, Celg is worth more. Unless deal falls apart that’s the value. 150 is ridiculous I agree with you. Management is horrible and clueless. I’m for the deal ..... With that being said. I have a limit sell order at 110 just in case some other company tosses in a bid for Celgene . April is the vote. If you believe deal is a done deal. Buy the spread.
Richard Berger profile picture
creepydudes,

You offer a reasonable analysis and chain of reasoning. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

Richard
Dave Schneider profile picture
You thought fair value for Celgene on its own could be up to $150? They are the poster child for raising prices on their cash cow and had the worst due diligence on acquisitions imaginable.
Richard Berger profile picture
Dave Schneider:

The NUMBERS indicate that 4 independent means of appraising fair value, which EACH and ALL showing good historical correlation to actual market pricing converge and agree on a fair value price in the $150.00 range for CELG. I have shown the basis of that information and its historical correlation graphically with actual price.

SOME people say that correlation to actual market price is not an indication of fair value. I say NONSENSE. Fair value that does NOT correlate with actual trading history is nothing but an academic exercise that has no link or use in the real world. We are interested in what a willing buyer and willing seller will agree to an exchange of shares price on a average day in the market. Numbers with no link to reality are like porn, pretty to look at but silly to expect or think are real life.

Richard
optionpro1776 profile picture
Here is my take on this.

Looking at rounded numbers, and assuming you sell a March $85 put for $200, if the deal falls apart by March 15, and CELG drops to its pre-announcement levels, you will pay $85.00 for a stock trading at 66.50.

For one contract that is an immediate paper loss of -$8500 + $6650 + 200 (you received for the put).

So the assumed potential loss if the deal falls apart by March 15th is $1650.

Your gain if the deal does not fall apart is $200 (you received for the put).

200/1650 = 12.12% or about 8/1.

So, if you think the odds of the deal falling apart before March 15 are greater than 8/1, this trade has a positive expectation to be profitable.

If you think the odds of the deal falling apart before March 15 are less than 8/1, this trade has a negative expectation to be profitable.

Personally, I think the odds of the deal falling apart by March 15 are more like 15/1 to 20/1 so I have made the trade.

Obviously, it's all subjective, as we can't read the future.
Richard Berger profile picture
OptionPro1776,

Thanks for joining our discussion and sharing your thoughts. We disagree on some of the price points likely if the deal unwinds (shares were Celgene shares were artifically low and rising sharply even before the offer so I hold not likely to fall back to those levels. None the less, your general approach to what anyone needs to do to evaluate the situation is well laid out as to where attention should be directed.

Richard
optionpro1776 profile picture
I agree. This was kind of a "worst case" analysis.
Mktneutralhedger profile picture
@optionpro1776
Clear reasoning. The same that made me do the trade as well.
sbrncra profile picture
Isnt there a 2$ bil failure clause?
Richard Berger profile picture
sbrncra,

YES! sort of.

thefly.com/...

If you can stay awake through all that language, you get to where there "may be" such a $2.2 Billion penalty. Vague language (vs shall pay) for a bit figure.

Richard
Ventureshadow profile picture
If the CELG buyout is called off, what happens to CELG stock will depend strongly on what is happening to the stockmarket as a whole. If stockmarket prices recover to where they were October 2018, CELG price should be near $85 even without a buyout.

$1.60 premium for an $85 naked put expiring 3/15 vs twice that for an $85 naked put expiring in mid-April. I sold those April puts for $4 a little while ago. CELG has to sell for under $81 in mid-April for me to lose money on this. Whether or not this buyout goes through I expect to make money on this.
Richard Berger profile picture
Ventureshadow,

Yes, you have added some risk but a good reward also.

Richard
Ventureshadow profile picture
Richard, thanks for your comment.

Of the various financial opportunities here, selling BMY puts seems safest, and I did this too. BMY was low before the CELG offer and then it fell after the offer. Shorting BMY puts should be profitable in all these circumstances: CELG offer called off, BMY bought out, CELG offer goes through. That seems to cover all foreseeable possibilities.
Richard Berger profile picture
Ventureshadow,

Yes, your reasoning is sound. The BMY puts were not my personal choice due to absolute gain and my view and confidence in CELG remaining near its current trading range if the deal fails. The reason it is at this range in my view is exactly because the market judges it the risk off (failed deal) value at this point. But I do agree with your thoughts that the BMY is probably the safest of the trades if one wants to play the idea at minimum risk and still strong yield reward.

Richard
Tom W Dorsey profile picture
The arbitrage play has been significantly de-risked in my opinion. The patent verdict combined with much more positive bio market would have the stock price about where it is now. If you believe the deal closes, stay or go long. If it doesn't close, how low will it drop? I could easily make the argument the CELG shareholders should vote the deal down and force BMY to up the offer. Thank you for a well reasoned article.
Richard Berger profile picture
Tom W Dorsey,

Thanks for joining our discussion and sharing your thoughts. The bias has moved and appears will continue to move to risk off and a successful merger conclusion. Another of the benefits of the March option strategy is that it still provides time to consider taking a long stake in Bristol after option expiration if there is still a significant arbitrage uncertainty discount. We can revisit that in mid March.

Richard
p
Thank you for the article. All this fuss about risk! I agree with Mr. Berger, that selling the Celgene March 15th, $85 put, is a reasonable way to reduce risk. i sold 6 puts today, at $1.60. By most accounts Celgene's financial fundamentals are sound, the pipeline is solid and the stock is undervalued. Worst case scenario, is that my 6 puts are exercised and I own 600 shares of Celgene, at a cost basis of $83.40. This short trade makes sense and carries minimal downside risk..
Richard Berger profile picture
picknelm,

Thank you for taking the time to read and to share your perspective.

Richard
J
Funny how people forget this swine was trading at $60 in late December, before the offer was announced . . . .
Richard Berger profile picture
JDoe20,,

Forget? I specifically pointed it out and why I believe it will not return to that level even if this one falls apart.

Your comment doesn't really reveal anything but thanks for reading.

Richard
S
This analysis is lacking on a lot of areas, especially it is overlooking the downside a lot which would leave one holding the shares for perhaps even three years if celg keeps sliding due to a no deal aka gild, and the options discussed are worthless market drops or celg slides due to rumors that deal might’ve scuttled , eg the starboard rumour a week ago, basically if one is not ready to hold celg for three years or more, the risk is unaccepatable
TradingPlacess profile picture
No risk no reward. I don’t think the term unacceptable is apropos ! Is there such think as acceptable risk?
Richard Berger profile picture
Saroj Silwal,

You input is deeply flawed.

1. I did point out that the downside is that share price might fall. I specifically discussed the pre-offer prices of the shares and what might be expected in that regard and laid out the numbers so the breakeven point (downside risk on) is obvious. I would never claim anything is risk free. The opportunities I describe are lower risk than the taking a share position long term because it is indeed exposed to market risk for a shorter time. That translates to less time for surprises. Further, it specifically exists almst a month before the shareholder votes, minimizing (but never fully eliminating) the rejection risk. Anytime you invest in the market, you have risk your investment may go down, may even stay down for years or even never recover.

Good luck with your investing.

Richard
Richard Berger profile picture
creepydudes,

No one size fits all. Clearly, Saroj Silwal is probaby best suited for investing in raw undeveloped land where the risk of change is minimal.

All investment comes with some risk. The choices are balance of risk to reward. Risk can also be managed slightly at the individual level and almost completely at the portfolio level. In fact, I have been involved in risk management for my entire career, over 48 years now.

Richard
JunkBondage profile picture
Factually incorrect. You state in summary at the top of your write-up that "Bristol-Myers Squibb tendered an offer for Celgene Corporation". This is wrong. The deal is not structured as a tender offer. Tender offer rules are very specific and differ greatly from a traditional merger structure (which this deal uses).

Also, it is incorrect to state that "Activist shareholder Starboard has taken a BMY stake and is expected to object to the merger." First of all, it has not been confirmed that Starboard has taken a stake in BMY. It is merely an unconfirmed Bloomberg story. And even if they have in fact taken a stake, it is presumptuous to state they are "expected to object to the merger." There is no evidence of this. If they purchased a stake it could be because they think BMY is getting a good deal and the BMY price decline is an overreaction. If you are going to speculate, make it clear that you are speculating, not basing your opinion on fact.

Finally, you fail to mention the biggest risk to this deal and the reason for the large spread: The need for BMY shareholder approval and worries that a large pharma company might bid for BMY. If someone did bid for BMY, then BMY shareholders would likely not approve this merger over the possibility they might get a large premium from a bidder for their shares. That's the reason for the large spread. I don't think it's a significant risk but that is what the market is worried about.

Important to get the facts and details straight or you are doing your readers a disservice.
Richard Berger profile picture
JunkBondEdge,

Thank you for your inputs. As to the tender, I plea mea culpa. My loose summary is incorrect in the manner you point out. It has zero bearing on my thesis presented however.

The Starboard position has been reported and may or may not provide resistance to the takeover. It is deemed by most that the deal will be approved by BMY shareholders. It is a risk to it going through however, exactly as I have mentioned and so have you in your comment. So, thank you for your input, but again a net zero bearing on my thesis.

Finally, we come to the risk the deal may not be approved by BMY shareholders. i specifically say exactly that and that it is the reason for the spread. I guess your short term memory had slipped by the time you got here.

Richard
JunkBondage profile picture
Dear Dick Berger, My short term memory is fine. It is your understanding of how markets work that has slipped, if you ever had any. The scenario where a large pharma company bids for BMY is much riskier to an arbitrage investor that the scenario where shareholders of BMY votes down the deal in the absence of a bid for BMY.

Arbs set up the spread: long CELG, short BMY. If shareholders of BMY merely vote down the deal without a bid for BMY being in the table, BMY probably goes back to around where it came from, the low/mid $50s (it came from $52.43 the day before the deal was announced). The short side of the trade goes up a few bucks and arbs lose a few bucks on the short leg (plus $X on the long side).

If someone large, such as Pfizer, for example, bids for BMY at a typical premium, say 35%, then the short side of the setup goes up to high $60s and arbs lose $15-20 on the short side + $X on the CELG long leg. Much bigger loss and much worse scenario. This is one of the big reasons for the humungous spread.
Richard Berger profile picture
JunkBondHedge,

You keep speaking of risk in trades I have not even suggested nor discussed in my thesis. I did NOT (deliberately so) set my idea up using a full arbitrage (paired long/short the targets) trade, rather I targeted simple ideas for cash secured puts on one or the other of the two merger targets based on a strike price which I argue is likely to be below market in the event of a failed merger (for the reasons I presented) and for a risk exposure window well short of the timing of a failed deal if it does fail, such that we are out of the trade before that exposure is likely to test the question (regardless of its risk when that test comes).

If you wish to discuss a paired arbitrage (stock or option long/short pairs) or a trade targeting a window beyond March 15th, then I suggest you write an article doing so. I have presented a narrow thesis and have no interest in engaging you in your strawmen.

Richard
tikigod18 profile picture
Celgene prevails in Revlimid patent challenge from Dr. Reddy's.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!

About BMY

SymbolLast Price% Chg
Market Cap
PE
Yield (TTM)
Rev Growth (YoY)
Short Interest
Prev. Close
Compare to Peers

More on BMY

Related Stocks

SymbolLast Price% Chg
CELG
--
BMY
--
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.