Exxon Trading Losses And Refinery Fire May Extend Earnings Decline

|
About: Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)
by: Josh Young
Summary

Exxon's Q1 earnings projected to decline year over year.

Trading losses may drag on performance.

Recent refinery fire may drag further.

Puts ramping up shale oil into perspective.

Analyst consensus estimates have Exxon's (XOM) earnings likely to show meaningful declines from last year's first quarter to this year. Exxon is projected to have the second worst earnings per share decline among the oil majors:

Exxon's 21% EPS decline is the second-worst among its peer group. The worst is Chevron (CVX), projected at a 25%. Coming in better are Shell's (RDS.A) 18% and BP's (BP) 10% decline. These declines stem from a range of factors, predominantly the lower price of oil in Q1 2019 vs Q1 2018.

Two items disclosed in the past month may weigh on Exxon's earnings more than anticipated in consensus estimates, both in Q1 and future quarters. These are a recent refinery fire at Baytown near Houston and trading losses from Exxon's recently expanded trading group.

The fire was ahead of a potential $1.9 billion expansion at Baytown. It is unclear how much the repairs may cost and if Exxon will be responsible for penalties or further clean air modifications, but the costs could be significant, as could the lost revenue from downtime. A settlement with the DOJ in 2017 required more than $300 million of modifications and a $2.5 million penalty.

The trading losses are particularly interesting. Reuters broke a story on this from my tip (frustrating to be the source and not to be quoted). Incidentally Reuters missed the point - in the presentation by Exxon's head of downstream, the executive mentioned that in a rising oil price environment, investors should expect losses at the high end of the range displayed (up to $250 million). The story wasn't just that Exxon had ramped up trading activities, but that the ramped up activities were resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars of unexpected losses.

Both the downtime and repairs at Baytown as well as trading losses from rising oil prices may weigh on Exxon beyond the first quarter. Consensus earnings for Q2 may need to fall as well, which could weigh on the stock. This ties into Exxon and Chevron's ramp up in the Permian.

One explanation for Exxon's acceleration of activity that I hadn't considered was that things might actually be going worse for Exxon elsewhere. Despite confirmed lower well productivity (subsequently confirmed in conversations with multiple service providers to Permian upstream operators) and despite suppressed earnings from shale oil drilling activity (a source of Chevron's EPS decline in Q1), perhaps accelerating activity in the Permian is return maximizing. Perhaps it is an indication of problems elsewhere in Exxon's portfolio (such as refinery fires and trading losses) that Exxon is redirecting capital and finding maximum risk adjusted returns in bottom-quartile Permian development.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: Opinions expressed herein by the author are not an investment recommendation and are not meant to be relied upon in investment decisions. The author is not acting in an investment adviser capacity. This is not an investment research report. The author's opinions expressed herein address only select aspects of potential investment in securities of the companies mentioned and cannot be a substitute for comprehensive investment analysis. Any analysis presented herein is illustrative in nature, limited in scope, based on an incomplete set of information, and has limitations to its accuracy. The author recommends that potential and existing investors conduct thorough investment research of their own, including detailed review of the companies' SEC filings, and consult a qualified investment adviser. The information upon which this material is based was obtained from sources believed to be reliable but has not been independently verified. Therefore, the author cannot guarantee its accuracy. Any opinions or estimates constitute the author's best judgment as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice.