Can Boeing Helicopters Recover?

Apr. 11, 2019 7:54 AM ETThe Boeing Company (BA)LMT, TXT16 Comments10 Likes
Edward Ambrose profile picture
Edward Ambrose


  • Boeing helicopter production will drop sharply in the fourth quarter of 2020.
  • A new generation of rotorcraft is being developed and Boeing will probably get revenue from these programs but its profit margins will be smaller.
  • Rotorcraft does not drive the stock price but the lower profits will lower the value of Boeing stock. Nevertheless, the earnings decline is about 2%. This is a hold.

Boeing's (NYSE:BA) 4500 person Pennsylvania plant will produce 53 Chinooks this year. After Oct 2020 that will drop to 4. The Arizona plant will stop Apache new built helicopters. The army is cutting back existing programs to fund it new projects. It anticipates that both existing programs will be replaced by new designs sometime in the future. Boeing and the local congressional representatives are lobbing to stop the cut. Officially, Chinook modernization has only been delayed five years. However, it is unlikely that five years from now production of the Chinook will be restarted. Boeing's success in rebuilding the helicopter in business depends upon getting new development programs, which will be challenging. It is unlikely that the new work will be cash cows like the Chinook and Apache. This issue should come up at the first quarter earnings call. The long-term helicopter loss of $12 billion is about 2% of annual net income. Boeing is a hold.

CH-47F Chinook

The Army is funding its new programs by cutting existing modernization in the fiscal 2020 budget. The Chinook CH-47F Block II is the biggest cut. The Chinook is a Vietnam War copter that first flew in 1961. Boeing has managed the enhancements well so the average Chinook is 7 years from its last remanufacture. The Bock II increased the cargo capacity by another ton. The block ll flew in March and Boeing has a contract to build 11 units. The program envisioned remanufacturing another 600 units, which would have produced roughly $12 billion in revenue in the next decade. The decline in the Apache will reduce revenue in the next five years by about $800 million.

CH-46 Chinook

Source Boeing

Future Vertical Lift (FVL)

The FVL program was started in 2003. It is controlled by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for acquisitions, and managed by the army. The concept was to develop helicopter technology to design in five models ranging from the smallest, a reconnaissance helicopter, to the largest, almost a C130. These helicopters would replace all the existing designs. In 2009, 4 suppliers were selected for study contracts, which resulted in two venders being awarded contracts to develop competing aircraft. The aircraft were to fly by December of 2017 under the Joint Multi-Role. Technology program. Bell, a division of Textron (TXT), and Sikorski, a division of Lockheed Martin (LMT), partnered with Boeing produced competing helicopters

The two aircraft are shown below. They were both designed to carry a twelve-man infantry squad replacing the Sikorski HU 60. The Bell V 280 flew on schedule by December of 2017. It has reached a cruising speed three hundred and twenty two miles per hour. This craft uses a fixed wing with a propeller that rotates ninety degrees for vertical takeoff. It is a lower cost, third generation version of a plane designed in cooperation with Boeing, the V22.

Bell V280 Valor

Source: Bell

The Sikorski-Boeing craft did not fly until fifteen months later in March 2019. It is a Sikorsky design that Boeing signed onto after its technology demonstrator failed. The Sikorski design has two counter rotating blades and a rear pusher propeller. This allows for much higher speeds than normal helicopters. It is expected to fly about forty miles an hour slower than the Bell version spec.

Sikorsky-Boeing SB-1 Defiant


Source: Sikorski-Boeing

The FVL program envisions an analysis of the two technology helicopters followed by a round of prototype and evaluation. Production would begin after 2030. The Army does not agree. It wants new aircraft much faster. The problem with common technology across a large difference in function is becoming clear. The Army is promoting two copters run by the Army FVL program staff.

Future-Armed Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA)

The Army expects to select 4 to 6 venders for FARA study contracts by June, two of which will be selected for prototype development. Boeing will bid separately as will Sikorski, Bell and some smaller companies. Sikorski developed the S-97 to both prove out its dual rotter concept and compete for an earlier reconnaissance helicopter. It has been flying for three years, giving Sikorski an advantage. The FARA will have capacity for six passengers. It will be relatively inexpensive compared to the Chinook. The FARA will replace Apaches used for reconnaissance.

Sikorski S-97 Rader

Source: Sikorski

Future Long Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA)

The FLRAA is being defined. The key question is will it be a longer-range version of the Technology Development copters or will it be carry as many troops as the current Chinook G version? It is unlikely that Boeing could bid on this alone. It would probably be a joint bid using Sikorski Technology.


Boeing is very likely to get contracts as a joint venture junior partner and possibly alone. However, it is unlikely that the revenue will be as high as it is now and the profit margin will not be as great. This is not going to swing the stock but it will lower the value of the stock. Nevertheless, this will lower net income 2%. This is a hold.

This article was written by

Edward Ambrose profile picture
I am not the typical analyst. I have unique skills, honed by years of successful Mergers and Acquisition accomplishments, to find beaten down stocks that have the potential for recovery and growth. These companies are helpful in balancing a portfolio as well as beating the market. This experience left with strong appreciation for fundamental analysis of a company’s businesses rather than the whole corporation, to find what will drive the results. 609 685 2290

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.