The Nvidia-Mellanox Deal: 21.99% Expected Annualized Return

Sep. 11, 2019 2:31 PM ETMellanox Technologies, Ltd. (MLNX), NVDA14 Comments9 Likes

Summary

  • Trade tension between the U.S. and China influences a lot of deal spreads.
  • The recent blow-up of the Qualcomm/NXP deal is still a fresh memory.
  • Given the wide deal spread it's worth taking the risk of another blow-up or extensive delays.
  • This idea was discussed in more depth with members of my private investing community, Special Situation Report. Get started today »

This Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) - Mellanox (NASDAQ:MLNX) spread is attractive today because of U.S - China trade tension and the blow-up of the chipmaker deal between Qualcomm (QCOM) and NXP (NXPI) have pushed out the spread so far that it's an attractive bet with an expected annualized return of 21.99%.

Over the deal lifetime, the raw spread has been as wide as 16%-plus and as tight as 3.4%. It's currently at 12.74% while we are quite a way into the process. If this deal breaks there's quite a bit of downside. I estimate the downside at $72 but there are quite a few analysts that put the downside in the 80s.

China risk for Nvidia - Mellanox deal

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce (or Mofcom) is taking an interest in a huge number of deals. They have a very low bar for the amount of sales in China before they want to be in the loop. As M&A is red hot this puts pressure on manpower, especially in complicated sectors. The chip sector is an industry where both China and the U.S. are focused on and the Qualcomm NXP deal blowing up happened thanks to Chinese approval delays. If China wants to use this deal as leverage I expect a similar playbook. No outright rejection but ongoing delays.

There also has been an update from the Nvidia (NVDA) earnings call:

...Lastly, regarding our pending acquisition of Mellanox, we have received regulatory approval in the U.S. and are engaged with regulators in Europe and China. The approval process is progressing as expected, and we continue to work toward closing the deal by the end of this calendar year...

In my last article I wrote:

Taking into account the expected closing date, estimated break price and my estimated closing probability, I think the expected annualized return is more than 21.06% here. I calculate expected annualized returns for every deal I'm interested in the M&A Dashboard. The expected annualized return isn't just the return in case of success but includes the failures as well. It's a higher bar compared to just the annualized return if the spread is closed.

Some of the important and subjective estimates that go into it are the probability of closing which I put at 92.5%. That's a low closing probability among the universe of deals but it is high compared to real tough cases like Sprint (S) T-Mobile (TMUS) and Oceanwide/Genworth (GNW). The break price is another subjective estimate that I put at $72 but I've heard many arbs use a higher number. As a closing date I'm working with 12/1/2019 but one of the major fears here are endless delays.

Read the full original take here.

Updated projection Nvidia-Mellanox

These deals that are vulnerable to Chinese regulators feel awful to invest in. But perhaps that's a good thing. It's hard to invest here for everyone. Institutional arbitrageurs may fear to look stupid if Chinese regulators wreak havoc on their portfolio. After the fact it will be hard to explain why you didn't see this coming as it is an obvious risk everyone is aware of.

I've slightly revised the odds of closure downward (even though progress has been made like approvals in U.S. and Europe) to 91%. This better reflects trade tension. I've also taken the expected closing date to 3/25/2020. This still gets me to an expected annualized return of about ~22%. This is certainly not the safest deal out there, but given the return profile, I'm retaining a small position.

It's small because I want to be mindful of not letting my exposure to Mofcom decisions run up too much. I have several other important positions that come with this risk as well. For example the very interesting Allergan (AGN) deal.

I like the Abbvie (ABBV) acquisition of Allergan better even though I expect a lower annualized return. Part of the reason is because I like Allergan as a standalone company at 10x free cash flow. Read more about that one here.

Theoretically, these mergers are separate events. The U.S. China tension introduces a significant shared risk factor across these deals.

Check out the Special Situation Investing report if you are interested in uncorrelated returns. We look at special situations like spin-offs, share repurchases, rights offerings and M&A events like Mellanox. Ideas like this are especially interesting in the current late stages of the economic cycle.

This article was written by

Bram de Haas profile picture
17K Followers
Professional risk-taker focused on smart bets and risk control.
15 years of investing and I feel like a rookie in his first year at the academy. My roots are in the value school but over time I've learned to respect different approaches. I'm interested in what quants do, options traders do, and even what WallStreetBets is doing (keep your friends close and...)

I gravitate towards special-situations. That means situations around companies or the market where the price can move in a certain direction based on a specific event or ongoing event. This eclectic and creative style of investing seems to suit my personality and interests most closely.

Since 2020 I host a podcast/videocast where I discuss (special-situation/event-driven) market events and investment ideas with top analysts, portfolio managers, hedge fund managers, experts, and other investment professionals. I highly recommend it (pick episodes around topics that interest you) for the amazing guests that come on with regularity.

I've been writing for Seeking Alpha since 2013 after playing p$ker (I'm not that immature but the real word gets censored) professionally. In 2018 I founded Starshot Capital B.V. A Dutch AIF manager. Follow me on Twitter @Bramdehaas or email me Dehaas.Bram at Gmail

Follow

Disclosure: I am/we are long MLNX. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: short NVDA

Recommended For You

Comments (14)

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.