3 Thoughts On The Bank Of England's November Decision

Nov. 07, 2019 2:04 PM ETEWU, DBUK, FKU, HEWU, QGBR, FLGB, ZGBR1 Like


  • At face value, the Bank's decision is dovish.
  • The Bank’s Brexit assumption could easily change again.
  • The Bank's investment rebound may not materialise.

By James Smith, Developed Market Economist

The Bank of England has taken markets by surprise, with two members voting for an immediate cut. But aspects of the Bank's new forecasts are not as dovish as we might have expected. While a lot depends on Brexit, we suspect it's too early to be pencilling in policy easing just yet

1) At face value, the Bank's decision is dovish

At face value, the Bank of England's latest monetary policy decision is more dovish than expected.

In a surprise move, two committee members voted for an immediate 25bp rate cut. Policymakers have also for the first time hinted at easing in their statement, suggesting that monetary policy may need to "reinforce" growth should Brexit uncertainty persist.

That suggests (in case there was any doubt) that the Bank is very unlikely to follow through with its signalled rate hikes (should Brexit go smoothly) anytime soon.

2) The Bank's Brexit assumption could easily change again

But dig a little deeper, and the Bank's latest report isn't quite as downbeat as the overarching guidance implies.

One surprising feature of the latest Bank of England projections is its decision to effectively assume that PM Johnson's Brexit deal will be ratified - taking the UK to a free-trade agreement in the longer term.

While this reflects the Bank's long-standing policy of basing forecasts on government policy, this will all depend on December's election. And while the polls suggest the Conservatives will gain a majority - giving PM Johnson the scope to get the deal ratified in Parliament - there is still a potential for big surprises when the UK goes to the polls next month.

We wouldn't rule out another hung parliament, which could either prolong the Brexit uncertainty or alternatively see a Labour-led minority government begin organising a second Brexit referendum.

In other words, it's not inconceivable that we see another sizable change to the Bank's projections early next year, depending on who prevails at next month's election.

3) The Bank's investment rebound may not materialise

The Bank has, as expected, downgraded its growth profile over the next three years, although this is largely accounted for by weaker global growth and a steeper yield curve.

But on investment, the Bank is a little more optimistic about 2020, assuming the deal is ratified. Policymakers now expect investment to return to very modest growth in 2020 compared to the fairly sizable fall policymakers had predicted back in August. In reality, a lot will depend on the length of the transition period. This standstill phase that is due to last until December next year will almost certainly need to be extended to allow time for a new trading relationship to be agreed.

However, this will require the government to sign up to EU budget payments by June to unlock a two-year extension until 2022. That will be a tough price for PM Johnson to pay, and negotiations over this will undoubtedly be noisy. While we ultimately suspect a longer transition is inevitable, until we know for sure, we suspect firms will continue to tread carefully, faced with a possible risk of the UK (ex. NI) leaving the EU's single market and customs union abruptly at the end of next year.

While we expect 2020 to be another uncertain year for the UK economy, we still think it is probably still a little too early to be pencilling in rate cuts. While the Bank is now hinting more directly at possible easing, we think the fact that it is still formally projecting excess demand in its forecasts and keeping the door open to rate hikes in its statement, suggests policymakers are reluctant to follow the Fed and ECB into rate cuts just yet.

Content Disclaimer

This publication has been prepared by ING solely for information purposes irrespective of a particular user's means, financial situation or investment objectives. The information does not constitute investment recommendation, and nor is it investment, legal or tax advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any financial instrument. Read more.

Original Post

This article was written by

From Trump to trade, FX to Brexit, ING’s global economists have it covered. Go to ING.com/THINK to stay a step ahead. We’re sorry we can’t reply to individuals' comments.Content disclaimer: The information in the publication is not an investment recommendation and it is not investment, legal or tax advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any financial instrument.This publication has been prepared by ING solely for information purposes without regard to any particular user's investment objectives, financial situation, or means. For our full disclaimer please click here.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.