The Lazy Retirement Portfolio: The Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund Is Worth Exploring

The European View profile picture
The European View
12.92K Followers

Summary

  • Actively managed funds have a hard time due to the overwhelming popularity of ETFs.
  • However, I think that The Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund is worth exploring for some investors.
  • This is especially true for those investors who do not attach importance to stock picking themselves, but who nevertheless pursue a dividend strategy.

Introduction

Today, actively managed funds have a hard time due to the overwhelming popularity of ETFs. The Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (MUTF:VDIGX) is such an actively managed fund. According to Vanguard, the fund seeks to provide, primarily, a growing stream of income over time and, secondarily, long-term capital appreciation and current income. According to Morningstar, the fund is still open, but it needs a minimum initial investment of USD 3,000. This makes the analysis interesting for two groups of investors. First, the article is for existing investors. Furthermore, the fund could be also worth exploring for risk-averse investors who save for their retirement. I will explain why this is the case in the following analysis.

Fund analysis

According to Vanguard:

the fund is designed to provide investors with some income while offering exposure to dividend-focused companies across all industries. The fund focuses on high-quality companies that have both the ability and the commitment to grow their dividends over time."

Given that, you can see the annual distribution as of June 2019 below:

Source: Morningstar

For an actively managed fund, the expenses (0.22%) are quite low. The defensive approach taken by the fund also becomes clear when looking at the upside and downside capture ratio. In downturns, the fund appears to outperform the benchmark. Of course, this is at the expense of the upside potential during upswings:

Source: Morningstar

The benchmark of the fund is the NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select. The fund is invested in 42 stocks right now. You can see a list of all stocks by clicking here. Overall, the fund contains less than 1/4 of the companies that the benchmark has. This means that the benchmark index is more diversified. However, an investment in 42 companies already includes a strong diversification. The fund also tends to invest in larger companies, as the average market capitalization is more than USD 10 billion above the average benchmark capitalization. In addition, the average P/E of the fund is below its benchmark:

The following companies are the ten largest holdings of the fund. Together, these stocks form 31.8% of total net assets:

However, the composition of the fund differs from the benchmark. However, this is to be expected, as otherwise, an active management of the fund would not be necessary.

It is noticeable that the fund overweights companies that are traditionally regarded as defensive. Compared to the benchmark, the company is much less invested in rather volatile information technology companies.

Looking at the dividend growth of the 10 largest companies, the following picture emerges.

Of the 10 largest companies, half have a negative growth rate. Conversely, for two companies, the growth rates are positive, and for three companies, the growth rates are stable. That gives altogether a mixed picture.

However, it must also be borne in mind that the fund is not interested in seeking the highest possible dividends, but in making long-term investments in companies that pursue a shareholder-friendly dividend policy. And especially in the case of companies with declining growth rates, it can be said that these were companies that performed well in the past and gave their shareholders a lot of pleasure. The average rate of increase last year, at more than 9 percent, was more than four times the rate of inflation. Last year's increase was even higher than the average increase of the last three years (8.2 percent).

Conclusion

Of course, investors can also simply buy the individual shares of the fund themselves. However, this leads to far more transaction costs than if investors simply buy into the fund. Investors who do not attach importance to stock picking themselves, but who nevertheless pursue a dividend strategy, have a good opportunity with the fund to invest in the long term.

If you enjoyed this article and wish to receive updates on my latest research, click "Follow" next to my name at the top of this article, and check "Get email alerts".

This article was written by

The European View profile picture
12.92K Followers
Runner of the TEV Blog | Lawyer For Competition Law And Antitrust | Private InvestorI am a long-term oriented investor and in my early thirties. I hold a law degree and a doctor in law and love investing and talking about my and others' investments. I regularly write about my research and investments on various investor platforms and on the TEV Blog. Living and working in Europe in an international law firm as a lawyer for antitrust & competition, I may have another view on American companies, especially when it comes to the reputation of a company or possible alternatives here in Europe. Hence, I try to build a diversified portfolio not only with American blue chips but also with smaller and maybe hidden European Champions. Given that, I am very sensitive and close to the political and economic fundamental environment in Europe. My readers benefit from this. When it was foreseeable that Qualcomm would be fined by the European Commission, I calculated the exact amount in advance and was able to inform my readers about it. The same applies to the European Commission's first interim measures against Broadcom, which were the first in two decades. Furthermore, I was the first analyst (to my best knowledge), who predicted without any doubts a dividend cut by Deutsche Telekom. **My articles represent my opinion only and in no way constitute professional investment advice. It is the responsibility of the reader to conduct their due diligence and seek investment advice from a licensed professional before making any investment decisions.**
Follow

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.