U.K. GDP for November fell by 0.3%. In normal times, this might prompt a policy reaction.
These aren't normal times. We've just had both Brexit and electoral uncertainty holding the economy back.
I'd be astonished if the Bank of England changed interest rates because of this - nothing useful is going to be known about GDP for another 6 weeks or so.
The GDP and stimulus question
GDP isn't everything, but it's a reasonable enough proxy for what we're aiming at with this very idea of having an economy - the people of the place getting richer over time. So, if GDP starts shrinking, then we might well see a policy reaction to this event.
Like, say, a lowering of interest rates in order to stimulate economic activity. Or a resumption of QE derived bond buying in order to get long-term interest rates down.
The UK has just recorded falling GDP for November, so are we going to see a change in monetary policy?
No change yet
I would argue that we're not and certain astonishment if we did. We shouldn't react to transient issues because, well, they're transient. True, often enough we don't know whether a particular economic event is caused by such transience or not, but here we've a pretty good idea.
Back in November, we were in the middle of an election campaign. One between a party that wanted to take the UK back to circa 1953 East German style, and one that, while a little too far left for my own tastes, had at least got the base message about capitalism and free markets.
We were also in the end stages - to be decided by that same election - of the uncertainty concerning Brexit. Were we going to leave the European Union or not?
We know that uncertainty is a killer of economic growth. The biggest variable in GDP over the business cycle is business investment. Exactly the thing that sinks like a stone when businessmen have no clue about what is to happen.
As I've been saying for many months now, the remarkable thing about the UK economy is how well it's done into the headwinds of that uncertainty. Further, given that the uncertainty is now lifted, we should see a strong rebound.
We should, that is - whether we actually will is another matter.
But this uncertainty applies to policymakers as well. Deriving policy from November's numbers, when we know uncertainty was high, to apply that policy in January, when the uncertainty is past tense - that doesn't work, does it? We need to see the numbers for when the uncertainty has passed.
That means that we're going to need to see December's GDP numbers and at least February's forecasts (from, perhaps, the PMI numbers) before we know, absolutely, that this is just a transient issue that has now gone away.
Thus, I don't expect any move from the BoE as a result of these figures.
We've those GDP numbers:
Output in the U.K. fell by 0.3% m/m but rose 0.6% y/y in November. Growth rates in October and September were each revised up to 0.1% m/m, so the rolling three-month rate in November was up 0.1%.
(UK GDP from Office for National Statistics)
This was made up of the index of production:
Total production output decreased by 0.6% for the three months to November 2019, compared with the three months to August 2019; this was led by manufacturing output, which fell by 0.8%.
(Index of Production from Office for National Statistics)
Services are, of course, very much more important, as they're a very much larger portion of the economy, perhaps 8 times as much:
In the three months to November 2019, services output increased by 0.1% compared with the three months to August 2019.
(Month-on-month services growth from Office for National Statistics)
These are not lovely numbers
As I say above, in normal times we'd be thinking about whether there's going to be a policy change to gee up this somnolent economy.
The point being that we're not in normal times. As I've been saying. We've seen the PMIs rising after the election, which resolved both forms of uncertainty. Other business surveys are showing much the same thing. And we would - and certainly the BoE would - expect that change to feed through into investment and thus growth.
If all we had to go on were these GDP numbers, then I'd be expecting a more stimulatory monetary policy from the Bank of England. But because we're really very certain that we did have that transient issue of uncertainty - uncertainty which is now resolved - I don't think we will.
The investor view
There's going to be a lot of commentary about how the UK economy is doing really badly at present and that we all need to take care. That someone must do something. My view is that the something has already been done, the election and thus the decision on Brexit.
Therefore, nothing need be done and nothing will be done. There's going to be no change in economic policy as a result of these numbers.
For those worried that it's not going to be a transient issue, the next statistics that will tell us anything are the January Purchasing Managers' Indices, which will start coming out on the last business day of this month. Those will be the first useful statistics we've got where the data has been collected after the election.
Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.