Argonaut Gold: Excessive Selling On Missed Guidance Now Offers A Very Attractive Valuation

Feb. 25, 2020 3:54 PM ETArgonaut Gold Inc. (ARNGF), AR:CA23 Comments

Summary

  • The valuation looks extremely attractive just on the producing assets.
  • The market has punished the stock excessively for missed cost and production guidance during 2019.
  • The lower cost development assets are not yet appreciated, which offers an appealing opportunity if a joint venture is announced during the year.

Investment Thesis

Argonaut Gold (OTCPK:ARNGF) missed the initial production and cost guidance from Q4 2018 and most of the guidance which was revised a couple of times during the year as the below figures illustrates. The stock has consequently been punished, excessively in my view.

Management is rightly questioned when this happens, but the stock price has gone down to levels where I think the downside is very limited for the patient investor.

Figure 1 & 2 - Source: Q4 2018 Presentation & Q3 2019 Presentation

The company produced 186,615 gold equivalent ounces in 2019, which by itself wouldn't have terrible given that production still increased by 21,498 GEO in 2018. However, when costs disappoint at the same time as production undershoots, the impact on All-in Sustaining Cost becomes very pronounced.

ChartData by YCharts

Figure 3 - Source: YCharts

The market seems to have overlooked that the price of gold has effectively offset the higher costs and is attributing a very low value to the later stage development assets with a combined NPV above $700M, at a $1,500/oz gold price.

Market Value

The current stock price is C$1.59, together with the prevailing exchange rate, latest share and financials information give us a market cap of $221.8M and an enterprise value of $193.0M.

Figure 4 - Source: Quarterly Reports & Price Data

Production & Valuation

Caution is certainly warranted when it comes to guidance given the recent misses. During 2019 the company produced 186,615 gold equivalent ounces with an adjusted cash cost of $923/oz and an adjusted AISC of $1,181/oz. I use adjusted numbers as the write downs are assumed to be non-recurring costs.

However, the company is not looking to stretch production in 2020, but rather focus on cost efficient production. So, a reversion in costs is not an aggressive assumption in my view.

Figure 5 - Source: Q4 2019 Conference Call Presentation

Let's use the production and cost guidance for 2020 in a few scenarios to illustrate the current valuation. We will only be looking at the producing assets in this section and a few of the inputs require some additional comments.

Cash Cost and All-in Sustaining Costs are not standard IFRS measures and there will often be smaller deviations to how they are applied.

AISC relates to the cost of maintaining production and is comparable to operating profits, but the biggest difference is that maintenance capex is used instead depreciation, depletion and amortization.

I have assumed that general & admin and exploration expenses are the same as 2019 numbers. I have assumed inventory write downs, value change on derivatives, and other income to be zero as they fluctuate from positive to negative during the quarters.

Figure 6 - Source: Own Estimates

Regardless on the assumptions we use, we get a very attractive valuation. EV to EBITDA is between 1.55 and 3.00 for the above scenarios. Enterprise value to All-in Sustaining Profit is between 2.09 and 5.51.

ChartData by YCharts

Figure 7 - Source: YCharts

The stock is presently trading at a very attractive level, when comparing the 2020 estimates to history, extremely so for the Mid-Point and Bull-Case scenarios.

It is worth highlighting that the price of gold is presently well above the price used for the Conservative scenario. If we use a gold price of $1,650/oz, the lowest point of the production guidance and highest points in cost guidance, EV to EBITDA is only 1.94 and EV to All-in Sustaining Profit is 2.76.

Development Assets

Magino is an extremely attractive asset, with a feasibility study in place and some environmental permits. The project is consequently at a relatively late stage of the development cycle. Note the NPV of $519M at a gold price of $1,500/oz. However, the company likely needs a partner to move the project forward in the near term given the initial capital cost of $321M.

Figure 8 - Source: January 2020 Corporate Presentation

Argonaut will be running a drill program at Magino during 2020 at a deeper level, which has the potential to increase the value of the asset, provided the veins from neighbouring assets continues.

Figure 9 - Source: Q4 2019 Conference Call Presentation

The company just released a pre-feasibility study of Cerro Del Gallo as well, which is smaller in size. The initial capital is a more manageable $134M with an NPV of 175M given a $1,350/oz gold price and $16.75/oz silver price. The NPV is naturally significantly higher given the current gold price which can be seen in the below sensitivity analysis from the report.

I expect Magino will be of higher priority for the company to move forward due to the later stage, more attractive location, and size.

Figure 10 - Source: Cerro Del Gado Pre-Feasibility Report

San Antonio was written down completely in the Q4 2019 given a denied environmental permit, so I wouldn't add a high probability that the project moves forward. However, a write down is a conservative approach and Argonaut will continue to with the permitting process.

Figure 11 - Source: 2018 Annual Report

Other Comments

2019 was not a great year for Argonaut, the company had production issues which resulted in missed guidance, there was a write down of both inventory and the San Antonio project.

The valuation has now gone to such an extremely attractive level, that the company doesn't need to outperform for there to be significant upside from current price. We simply need to see cost revert toward historical levels.

Figure 12 - Source: Quarterly Reports

Argonaut has also locked in the realized gold price between $1,450/oz on the downside and $1,672/oz to $1,816/oz on the upside for portion of production over the next two and half years. This also offers some downside protection if we see a significant sell-off in the price of gold.

Figure 13 - Source: Q4 2019 Financial Report

I was pleased with the communication from the Q4 2019 conference call, which emphasized the focus on generating cash flows and optimizing the development assets. There is always a concern that mistakes will compound, and the company would take on significant leverage or re-finance to rush the larger development projects. That does not appear to be the case for Argonaut.

We can also see the target price from analysts covering the stock is well above the current stock price and the target price has been raised during the last 30 days.

Figure 14 - Source: MarketBeat

Given the very low enterprise value of C$193M and the NPV of Magino specifically, Argonaut also has the potential to be an acquisition target. I don't use this as for the base case when estimating the value of a company, but it is an interesting consideration though. One point which makes this more relevant to Canadian operators is that Argonaut sits on operating loss carryfowards, not reflected on the balance sheet.

Figure 15 - Source: Q4 2019 Financial Report

Conclusion

If one is looking for a stock to take part in the current bull-run, with a high beta to the price of gold, this is likely not the stock for you.

However, unless the company manages to destroy a significant portion of the value of the producing and development assets, this stock price offers a very attractive risk-reward. Patience is likely required though and I have just started to build a position.

I see several scenarios where Argonaut is up 100% over the coming 12-18 months, but I think a lot of things will have to go wrong at the same time for this to be a losing investment, which at least fits my definition of great risk reward.

Editor's Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.

This article was written by

Bang For The Buck profile picture
3.15K Followers
A cyclical value approach, presently focused on precious metals and uranium

I enjoy my anonymity, where I write under the name Bang For The Buck. I hold a BSc and MSc in Financial Economics, but most of my value-based investment knowledge comes from independent learning where I am a perpetual student. I primarily focus on turnaround stories, with attractive valuations, in cyclical industries. I have a significant portion of my portfolio exposed to the precious metals industry due to current monetary and fiscal policies.

I publish regular articles on Seeking Alpha and offer a Marketplace service called Off The Beaten Path where subscribers receives real-time updates on the portfolio, in-depth portfolio reports, and frequent updates on holdings companies. As the name suggest, I primarily invest in industries and companies that are underappreciated, which I have found provides more attractive returns.

I am always happy to respond to comments and questions in my articles during the first few days. More in-depth ongoing discussions are had inside Off The Beaten Path.

Disclosure: I am/we are long ARNGF. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Recommended For You

Comments (23)

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.