Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Welcome To Financial And Economic Re-Education Camp

James Picerno profile picture
James Picerno
6.2K Followers

Summary

  • At its core, the sharp decline in stock prices is an effort to reprice a future that must deal with the coronavirus (Covid-19) on the world stage.
  • The basic issue here is that a Covid-19-laced future is considerably more uncertain compared with the pre-coronavirus outlook.
  • As painful as a correction is, it's helpful to keep in mind that we've been here before from a pricing perspective.

Originally posted on February 28, 2020

For the casual observer, the stock market's rapid slide looks like madness. It was, after all, only last week that the S&P 500 closed at a record high. Six trading days later, the market has lost 12% (as of Feb. 27)-the fastest correction on record for declines of 10%-plus. But before we let recency bias take complete control of our minds, let's consider if there's a method in Mr. Market's madness.

At its core, the sharp decline in stock prices is an effort to reprice a future that must deal with the coronavirus (Covid-19) on the world stage. It now appears that containing the virus is impossible. The World Health Organization says the Covid-19 outbreak has reached a "decisive point" and has "pandemic potential." The outlook as recently as a week ago, when the S&P traded at a record high, is ancient history.

The operative question for the market's sharp refocus is neatly summed up in the famous line attributed to John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"

Mr. Market emphatically chooses the latter, as he always does. In the short run, discounting the future can be a messy business, as recent days remind. More of the same is likely coming. The basic issue here is that a Covid-19-laced future is considerably more uncertain compared with the pre-coronavirus outlook. The transition is all the tougher because the US stock market had, for weeks, effectively ignored coronavirus risk, preferring instead to price in smooth economic sailing and discounting an unusually sunny future. And then suddenly, Mr. Market thought otherwise and the results are ugly as sentiment tries to play catch-up with world events.

It's not unlike a traveler who was expecting a mild, spring day and instead

This article was written by

James Picerno profile picture
6.2K Followers
James Picerno is a financial journalist who has been writing about finance and investment theory for more than twenty years. He writes for trade magazines read by financial professionals and financial advisers. Over the years, he’s written for the Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, Bloomberg Markets, Mutual Funds, Modern Maturity, Investment Advisor, Reuters, and his popular finance blog, The CapitalSpectator. Visit: The Capital Spectator (www.capitalspectator.com)

Recommended For You

Comments (2)

unclephool profile picture
Thanks for the article. I have been a long-term STAR holder. When I was just starting out in the early 90s, I could not easily get together the $3k or $5k minimums that most investment firms required to start funds. But at that time, Vanguard would let you start STAR with $0 if you did automatic investment (rare at that time) of at least $50. I could certainly afford $50/mo. Then I added to my monthly as I had more income. It is now enough to meet 18 months of my expenses. I have always thought of this as my 'riskier' emergency money that gains a bit more than my cash pile. Sure max drawdown was 35% in 2008, but that was much less than the 51% drawdown of SPY.

I will continue to keep STAR in my portfolio. I think it is a really good choice for investors, new and old.
UP
Market Map profile picture
It will be interesting to see the return dynamics of 60 / 40 Target date portfolios going forward ( portfolios that are primary to boomers' retirement portfolios ) will be with non existent or negative rates. Will these portfolios' duration asset allocations be "paying" coupons back to the government in the case of negative rates ? In that case, the equity allocation of these portfolios, which has typically shrunk somewhat significantly into the retirement phase, would need to do some "heavy lifting" in order for the portfolio to provide a return sufficient for decent retirement income level. A scenario that the Target date / balanced fund industry and naive investors would have never envisioned.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!

Related Stocks

SymbolLast Price% Chg
SPY--
SPDR® S&P 500 ETF Trust
QQQ--
Invesco QQQ Trust ETF
DIA--
SPDR® Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
SH--
ProShares Short S&P500 ETF
IWM--
iShares Russell 2000 ETF

Related Analysis

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.