Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Weekly Closed-End Fund Roundup: HQH And GGZ Boosts, GUT And OXLC N-2s (February 21, 2020)

Mar. 11, 2020 12:03 PM ETBEN, BTA, BWG, BZM, CIF, CSQ, CXH, AGD, DMO, EFT, EHI, EHT, EIM, EVM, FINS, FTF, GFY, GGT, GGT.PR.E, GGZ, GGZ.PA, GIM, GUT, GUT.PA, GUT.PR.C, HQH, IIM, JHAA, KF, LGI, LM, LMHA, LMHB, MCR, MEN, MFM, MFV, MHE, MIE, MIN, MMD, MMT, MXE, NBH, NTG, OIA, OXLC, OXLCM, OXLCO-OLD, OXLCP, PYN, RGT, RMI, TEI, TYG, VGM, VKI, VMO19 Comments

Summary

  • 12 out of 23 CEF sectors positive on price and 8 out of 23 sectors positive on NAV this week.
  • Franklin Resources buys Legg Mason.
  • HQH and GGZ boosts their distributions.
  • GUT and OXLC have filed for N-2s.
  • Looking for a helping hand in the market? Members of CEF/ETF Income Laboratory get exclusive ideas and guidance to navigate any climate. Get started today »

Author's note: This article was released to CEF/ETF Income Laboratory members on Feb. 24, 2020.

The Weekly Closed-End Fund Roundup will be put out at the start of each week to summarize recent price movements in closed-end fund [CEF] sectors in the last week, as well as to highlight recently concluded or upcoming corporate actions on CEFs, such as tender offers. Most of the information has been sourced from CEFInsight or the Closed-End Fund Center. I will also link to some articles from Seeking Alpha that I have found for useful reading over the past week. The searchable tag for this feature is "cildoc." Data is taken from the close of Friday, February 21st, 2019.

Weekly performance roundup

12 out of 31 sectors were positive on price (down from 20 last week) and the average price return was +0.14% (up from +0.42% last week). The leading gainers were Commodities (+5.63%), Taxable Munis (+2.24%) and California Munis (+0.78%) while MLPs (-2.52%) lagged.

(Source: Stanford Chemist, CEFConnect)

8 out of 31 sectors were positive on NAV (down from 15 last week), while the average NAV return was -0.01% (down from +0.47% last week). The top sectors by NAV were Commodities (+4.75%), Taxable Munis (+1.43%) and California Munis (+0.98%). The lowest sectors by NAV were MLPs (-2.48%) followed by Asia Equity (-1.08%).

(Source: Stanford Chemist, CEFConnect)

The top 3 sectors by premium were Multisector Income (+6.75%), Emerging Market Income (+5.08%) and Preferreds (+4.85%), while the sector with the highest discount is Asia Equity (-13.10%). The average sector discount is -2.17% (up from -2.34% last week).

(Source: Stanford Chemist, CEFConnect)

The sector with the highest premium/discount increase was Emerging Market Income (+0.89%), Asia Equity (-1.18%) showed the largest premium/discount decline. The average change in premium/discount was +0.17% (up from -0.06% last week).

(Source: Stanford Chemist, CEFConnect)

Profitable CEF and ETF income and arbitrage ideas

Closed-end funds news and recommendations are now exclusive to members of CEF/ETF Income Laboratory. We also manage market-beating closed-end fund (CEF) and exchange-traded fund (ETF) portfolios targeting safe and reliable ~8% yields to make income investing easy for you. Check out what our members have to say about our service.

To see all that our exclusive membership has to offer, sign up for a free trial by clicking on the button below!

https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2019/7/11/27546953-15628629169293847.png

This article was written by

Stanford Chemist profile picture
18.94K Followers

Stanford Chemist is a scientific researcher by training. For the past decade he has been providing analysis and evidence-based ways of generating profitable investments with CEFs and ETFs. He leads the investing group Learn more.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I am/we are long THE STOCKS IN OUR PREMIUM PORTFOLIOS. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (19)

S
Hi SC, Was deliberating joining your service, but at this point am wondering what good it would do until things shake out. Any honest thoughts would be great. sg.
Stanford Chemist profile picture
Hi @sgmonroe@frontier.com , thanks for the question! Now is a much better time joining us than anytime over the last 12 months. As a reader you'll have seen how CEF discounts have been getting narrower and narrower, making it hard to find attractive opportunities. With the selloff over the last couple days we finally have opportunities opening up and today we recommended a list of conservative buys from our portfolios for newer members wishing to start our income strategy but remain relatively defensive: seekingalpha.com/...
S
Yes, hard to have cash when swimming in sea of red, What are your thoughts on OXLC sustainable dividends? I’m huge into them and the loss also.
CEF Investor profile picture
GUT: NAV $4.23 and price $7.34, a premium of 74%. I could not believe what I am looking at! March madness at its extreme! A lot of retirees are gonna lose the rest of their life. Sad!
j
I bought last time GUT did a rights offering. Glad I did. Trimmed some in the upper 7's. I'll probably increase my position if they do again and the share price falls enough. Also watching UTG to add.
CEF Investor profile picture
@justaminute Are you still in GUT?
j
@CEF Investor
Yes. Intend to upsize my position.
CEF Investor profile picture
Wow! The premium of GUT is now at 67%, and probably will exceed 70% after its NAV is published later today!
m
Be careful what you wish for. I definitely was wishing for a market correction to lower some of the CEF's prices and premiums. But this is not what I hoped for :-(
Stanford Chemist profile picture
Hi @malka , at least were prepared!
NV_GARY profile picture
Ah, the good old days when CEFs were 'up'
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.