Russia Explains Why It Killed The OPEC Deal

Vladimir Zernov profile picture
Vladimir Zernov
16.13K Followers

Summary

  • I follow up on my previous article regarding the collapse of the OPEC deal.
  • Russia's deputy energy minister provides his rational for Russia's decision and sends signals to the market.
  • Russia looks serious about tolerating pain from low oil to gain market share and deal a blow to U.S. shale for both political and economic reasons.

At the beginning of this week, I wrote about Russia's reasons for abandoning the OPEC deal in an article titled "Why Russia Killed The OPEC Deal". It did not take long for Russia to explain its reasons in an exclusive interview for Reuters. Those investors who are seriously interested in the oil space should definitely read the whole Reuters material (it is short), while I'll focus on the main points and provide my commentary. We'll also look at what this means for the various segments of the oil industry.

The interview was given by Russia's deputy energy minister Pavel Sorokin. It is very important to keep in mind that such high-level officials are not in the business of providing market analysis and forecasts. Instead, they are providing their signals to the market.

Without further ado, let's look at the key points:

  1. Russia believes that it is impossible to combat a situation when the demand is constantly falling, and the bottom is unclear.
  2. Moscow's initial position was to extend the agreement without additional cuts for the second quarter. Also, Moscow did not exclude the possibility of extending the OPEC deal even further.
  3. For Russia, the new cuts would have meant cuts of additional 300,000 bbl/day, bringing the total cuts to 600,000 bbl/day, which is technologically challenging.
  4. Sorokin stated that oil prices in the range of $45-55 per barrel are fair and will allow to invest in projects and keep supply coming.
  5. He believes that oil prices will increase to $40-45 per barrel in the second half of 2020 and continue their upside to $45-50 in 2021.
  6. In a Russian-language version of the interview (you can run it through Google translate), he added that while the ruble-denominated price of 3,000 per barrel is very comfortable, prices in the range of 2,100-2,500 rubles per barrel are satisfactory. I don't know why the authors of the interview decided to omit this information from the English version as I believe it also sends an important signal.

Let's go step by step. When Russia says that it is technologically challenging to adjust production, it says the truth - Russian oil is mostly extracted in unfavorable conditions. Let's look at the weather in Nizhnevartovsk, a city that was built for oil workers who developed the Samotlor field:

Source

In cold conditions, it is technologically challenging to make downward adjustments to production, so Russia does not have too much room for maneuver unlike Saudi Arabia whose climate is completely different.

Once the production cuts are implemented and production reaches some stable level, keeping production at these levels does not require much efforts so Russia's offer to maintain the previous deal is not surprising.

Russia's cold climate is hardly news to anyone. The most interesting part of the interview is the "oil price forecast" part, which is, of course, not a forecast but a signal to other oil producers. The level of $45-55 will be sufficient enough to put an end to the growth of the American shale production and at the same time to balance Russia's budget. Also, the path to $45-55 is presented as a long one (since Sorokin does not expect oil to reach $55 in 2021), promising months of hard pain for higher-cost shale producers, especially those who are burdened with debt.

As I noted above, the ruble-denominated price of oil is a very important factor. American producers sell oil for dollars and have costs in dollars. Russian producers sell oil for dollars but then convert them into rubles - and have costs in rubles. Therefore, the ruble-denominated price of the barrel of oil is more important for Russian producers and the Russian budget than the dollar-denominated price. Russia's Urals trade with a $3-4 discount to Brent. As I write these words, Brent is trading at $34 per barrel, while one dollar buys you 74.5 rubles. Applying a $4 discount for illustrative purposes, we get a ruble-denominated oil price of 2,235, in line with the acceptable level of 2,100-2,500 rubles per barrel presented by Sorokin.

It is always challenging to read the political tea leaves, but in this case, objective facts seem to fit well into the subjective narrative - Russia is serious about sustaining low oil prices for a material period of time. So, what does it mean for oil-related equities?

Given the additional problems with coronavirus, both WTI (USO) and Brent (BNO) may find it hard to rebound from current levels and even carry additional downside risks, especially in case Saudi Arabia and UAE turn their stated intentions to raise production into reality.

The biggest hit comes to heavily indebted offshore drillers, which require higher oil prices for the much-needed upside in dayrates. Valaris (VAL), Noble Corp. (NE), Seadrill (SDRL) find themselves in a very challenging situation. The environment is a bit easier for Transocean (RIG) and Diamond Offshore (DO) but they face the same existential risks. Stocks of other drillers like Borr (BORR) or Pacific Drilling (PACD) will also find themselves under pressure despite the fact that they are already trading in the penny stock zone.

Shale players (both oil and gas) with debt challenges have also found themselves under pressure: Antero Resources (AR), Chesapeake Energy (CHK), Whiting Petroleum (WLL), Oasis Petroleum (OAS), SM Energy (SM), Extraction Oil & Gas (XOG) and the like. While such falling price charts may ultimately present a one-day upside opportunity for day traders, it is highly likely that the prolonged low oil price environment will force the weaker companies into restructuring.

Therefore, anyone willing to speculate will be safer doing such speculations in healthier players like Concho Resources (CXO), EOG Resources (EOG), Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD) - but keep in mind that there may be more room to fall, and that short sellers have not yet turned their attention to the healthier bunch - short interest in the above-mentioned companies is low.

Services - Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), Baker Hughes (BKR) - have already been materially punished. It is clear that the prolonged oil price downside will lead to a major drop in capex spending as companies will try to survive the downturn by cutting costs everywhere they can. Judging by current dividend yields of oil service players, the market tells us that dividends are unsustainable - and I agree with the market.

I maintain my view that the best opportunity will ultimately be presented by majors - Exxon Mobil (XOM), Chevron (CVX), BP (BP), Total (TOT), Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A) (RDS.B). Dividend adjustments are certainly possible even in the case of majors since no one knows at this point how long the coronavirus problems will last. For those looking for a bargain, the ideal scenario will be to buy majors after a sell-off that follows a dividend cut. Currently, there's panic in the market (and generally in the world) so we may see times when hot heads will start talking about the ultimate demise of major oil producers - that would be the best moment to initiate a new position or to add to an existing one if you have decided to sit through thick and thin.

To sum it up: oil is getting hit by a double blow from the collapse of the OPEC deal and coronavirus containment measures. Currently, it looks like Russia is very serious about sticking to its new position and trying to deal a blow to the U.S. shale, both for political and for longer-term market share reasons. The situation on the coronavirus front gets worse day by day (when I say this I mean containment measures; I'm not an epidemiologist and I can't evaluate the biological impact of the virus and its potential spread) which is very concerning for oil.

When Brent oil visited sub-$40 territory back in late 2015-early 2016, it fell towards $30 for about five weeks. The rebound towards $40 took eight weeks, and oil traded near $40 for about four more weeks before it was ready to move to the upside. In total, it took oil about four months to get firmly back above $40. Given the current external shocks that did not exist at that time, it's hard to believe that oil will have a quicker rebound.

This is certainly the time of fear - and a time of opportunity. Manage your risks properly and good luck!

If you like my work, don't forget to click on the big orange "Follow" button at the top of the screen and hit the "Like" button at the bottom of this article.

This article was written by

Vladimir Zernov profile picture
16.13K Followers
I'm a trader who trades both short-term and long-term. I started my career as a day-trader for a trading firm, but then turned to longer time frames and went on my own to manage my portfolio. I use technical analysis as well as fundamental analysis in my research.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: I may trade any of the above-mentioned stocks.

Recommended For You

Comments (1,446)

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.