Weekly High Frequency Indicators: Huge Negatives Continue - But Consumer Spending Not Following Yet

Mar. 28, 2020 7:30 AM ETSPY, QQQ, DIA, SH, IWM, TZA, SSO, TNA, VOO, SDS, IVV, SPXU, TQQQ, UPRO, PSQ, SPXL, UWM, RSP, SPXS, SQQQ, QID, DOG, QLD, DXD, UDOW, SDOW, VFINX, URTY, EPS, TWM, SCHX, VV, RWM, DDM, SRTY, VTWO, QQEW, QQQE, FEX, ILCB, SPLX, EEH, EQL, QQXT, SPUU, IWL, SYE, SMLL, SPXE, UDPIX, JHML, OTPIX, RYARX, SPXN, HUSV, RYRSX, SCAP, SPDN, SPXT, SPXV3 Comments13 Likes
New Deal Democrat profile picture
New Deal Democrat
3.43K Followers

Summary

  • High frequency indicators can give us a nearly up-to-the-moment view of the economy.
  • The metrics are divided into long leading, short leading, and coincident indicators.
  • As expected, both short leading and coincident indicators remained near their post crash lows.
  • But long leading indicators, while softening, remain weakly positive.
  • And consumer spending held up one full week after stocking up supposedly ended.

Purpose

I look at the high frequency weekly indicators because while they can be very noisy, they provide a good nowcast of the economy, and will telegraph the maintenance or change in the economy well before monthly or quarterly data is available. They are also an excellent way to "mark your beliefs to market." In general, I go in order of long leading indicators, then short leading indicators, then coincident indicators.

A Note on Methodology

Data is presented in a "just the facts, ma'am" format with a minimum of commentary so that bias is minimized.

Where relevant, I include 12-month highs and lows in the data in parentheses to the right. All data taken from St. Louis FRED unless otherwise linked.

A few items (e.g., Financial Conditions indexes, regional Fed indexes, stock prices, the yield curve) have their own metrics based on long-term studies of their behavior.

Where data is seasonally adjusted, generally it is scored positively if it is within the top 1/3 of that range, negative in the bottom 1/3, and neutral in between. Where it is not seasonally adjusted, and there are seasonal issues, waiting for the YoY change to change sign will lag the turning point. Thus I make use of a convention: data is scored neutral if it is less than 1/2 as positive/negative as at its 12-month extreme.

With long leading indicators, which by definition turn at least 12 months before a turning point in the economy as a whole, there is an additional rule: data is automatically negative if, during an expansion, it has not made a new peak in the past year, with the sole exception that it is scored neutral if it is moving in the right direction and is close to making a new high.

For all series where a graph is available, I have provided a link to where the relevant graph can be found.

Recap of monthly reports

For what it’s worth, February new home sales, durable goods orders, personal income, personal spending, and FHFA house prices were all positive. “Core” capital goods declined, as did the University of Michigan’s preliminary consumer sentiment reading. Except for consumer sentiment, all of this was before the impacts of the coronavirus began to be felt in the wider economy.

Long leading indicators

Interest rates and credit spreads

Rates

  • BAA corporate bond index 5.01%, down -0.12 w/w (1-yr range: 3.29-5.18)
  • 10-year Treasury bonds 0.70%, down -0.18% w/w (0.54-2.79)
  • Credit spread 4.31%, up +0.06% w/w (1.96-4.31) (new 10 year high)

(Graph at FRED Graph | FRED | St. Louis Fed)

Yield curve

  • 10 year minus 2 year: +0.45%, down -0.10% w/w (-0.04 - 0.55)
  • 10 year minus 3 month: +0.57%, down -0.26% w/w (-0.52 - 0.70)
  • 2 year minus Fed funds: +0.15%, down -0.18% w/w

(Graph at FRED Graph | FRED | St. Louis Fed)

30-Year conventional mortgage rate (from Mortgage News Daily) (graph at link)

  • 3.62%, down -.53% w/w (3.13-4.63)

BAA Corporate bonds and Treasury bonds turned positive several months ago. That corporate bonds recently fell to yet another new expansion low would ordinarily be extremely bullish into Q1 2021, but the spike to nearly 5-year highs would ordinarily mean this is a negative. Together, these make corporate bonds a neutral, while Treasuries remain a positive.

The spread between corporate bonds and Treasuries has exploded negative. All three measures of the yield curve are now solidly positive. Mortgage rates declined enough this week to be scored a positive again.

Housing

Mortgage applications (from the Mortgage Bankers Association)

  • Purchase apps -15% w/w to 240 (231-315) (SA)
  • Purchase apps 4 wk avg. down 9 to 267 (SA)
  • Purchase apps YoY -11% (NSA)
  • Purchase apps YoY 4 wk avg. +5.5% (NSA)
  • Refi apps -34% w/w (SA)

*(SA) = seasonally adjusted, (NSA) = not seasonally adjusted

(Graph at here)

Real Estate Loans (from the FRB)

  • Up +0.2% w/w
  • Up +4.4% YoY (2.8-4.7)

(Graph at Real Estate Loans, All Commercial Banks | FRED | St. Louis Fed)

With lower rates since early 2019, purchase mortgage applications were solidly positive. This week they reversed back to negative. Lower rates also recently led to a decadal high in refi, but these have retreated back to neutral.

For two weeks in 2019, the growth rate in loans fell below +3.25%, and so went back from positive to neutral, but then rebounded to positive and has generally stayed there since.

Money supply

M1

  • +1.6% w/w
  • +2.6% m/m
  • +7.2% YoY Real M1 (-0.1 to 7.2) (new one year high)

M2

  • +1.1% w/w
  • +1.7% m/m
  • +6.0% YoY Real M2 (2.0-6.0) (new one year high)

(Graph at FRED Graph | FRED | St. Louis Fed)

In 2018 and early in 2019, real M1 turned neutral and very briefly negative. Real M2 growth fell below 2.5% almost all during 2018 and early 2019, and so was rated negative. Last year, both continued to improve and for the past few months, both have turned and remained positive. Fed actions to combat the economic crash have only amplified that.

Corporate profits (estimated and actual S&P 500 earnings from I/B/E/S via Factset.com)

  • Q4 2019 actual, up +0.01 to 41.78, down -1.0% q/q, down -2.5% from Q4 2018 peak
  • Q1 2020 estimated, down -0.68 to 37.47, down -10.3% q/q, down -12.6% from Q4 2018 peak

(Graph: P. 26 at here)

FactSet estimates earnings, which are replaced by actual earnings as they are reported, and are updated weekly. Based on the preliminary results, I expanded the "neutral" band to +/-3% as well as averaging the previous two quarters together, until at least 100 companies have actually reported.

Q1 earnings have been downgraded over-5% in the past month. Needless to say, this metric is negative.

Credit conditions (from the Chicago Fed) (graph at link)

  • Financial Conditions Index up +.31 (less loose) to -0.17
  • Adjusted Index (removing background economic conditions) up +.54 (less loose) to +0.31
  • Leverage subindex up +.32 (less loose) to +0.29

The Chicago Fed's Adjusted Index's real break-even point is roughly -0.25. In the leverage index, a negative number is good, a positive poor. The historical breakeven point has been -0.5 for the unadjusted Index. Until last week, all three metrics had shown looseness and so were positives for the economy. Last week all three rose into “neutral” territory, and this week all are negative.

Short leading indicators

Trade weighted US$

Both measures of the US$ were negative early in 2019. In late summer, both of improved to neutral on a YoY basis. The measure against major currencies took a major spill recently. Both measures had recently been neutral. This week, the broad measure remained negative, while as to major currencies it turned positive.

Commodity prices

Bloomberg Commodity Index

  • Up +1.61 to 62.71 (61.10-83.08)
  • Down -22.5% YoY

(Graph at Bloomberg Commodity Index)

Bloomberg Industrial metals ETF (from Bloomberg) (graph at link)

  • 92.13, down -0.20 w/w (88.46-124.03) (New 12 month low intraweek)
  • Down -19.2% YoY

Commodity prices surged higher after the 2016 presidential election. Both industrial metals and the broader commodities indexes declined to very negative into 2019. Industrial metals briefly improved enough to be scored neutral and then positive, but both are back to (as of the past three weeks, extremely) negative.

Stock prices S&P 500 (from CNBC) (graph at link)

  • Up +10.4% to 2541.47 vs. 2304.92

In 2019 stocks made repeated new 3-month and all-time highs, right up into February. With the past two weeks’ crash, they made a new 3-month and 1-year lows. Since in the past three months there have been both new 3-month highs and lows, in my discipline - which does not know whether the next three months will be L-, V-, or some other shape, this makes this metric neutral.

Regional Fed New Orders Indexes

(*indicates report this week)

The regional average is more volatile than the ISM manufacturing index, but usually correctly forecasts its month-over-month direction. It was "very" positive for most of 2018, but cooled beginning late last year. All during 2019 it had been waxing and waning between positive and flat, until it turned negative in January. In February there was a strong positive spike, which I interpreted to mean that manufacturers were trying to lock in supplies in advance of what they anticipate will be major disruptions. This month, this has fallen apart and the average is the most negative it has been at least since 2016.

Employment metrics

Initial jobless claims

  • 3,283,000, up +3,002,000
  • 4-week average 998,250, up +765,750

(Graph at FRED Graph | FRED | St. Louis Fed)

Initial claims made new 49-year lows last April. That has all gone out the window.

Temporary staffing index (from the American Staffing Association) (graph at link)

  • Unchanged at 86 w/w
  • Down -7.2% YoY

This index turned negative in February 2019, worsened in the second half of the year, and has worsened still in the last few weeks.

Tax Withholding (from the Dept. of the Treasury)

  • $239.0 B for the last 20 reporting days vs. $230.7 B one year ago, up +$8.3 B or +3.6%

YoY comparisons with the exception of only three weeks have been positive since February 2019. While still positive, this week’s reading is at the low end of its recent YoY range, and I expect it to decline further next week.

Oil prices and usage (from the E.I.A.)

  • Oil down -$2.25 to $21.55 w/w, down -63.2% YoY (intraweek 18 year low)
  • Gas prices down -$.13 to $2.12 w/w, down -$0.50 YoY (four year low)
  • Usage 4-week average up +1.2% YoY

(Graphs at This Week In Petroleum Gasoline Section)

At the beginning of this year they went higher YoY, but since have abruptly turned lower; thus they have turned positive. Gas prices have generally declined since May 2019 and are now near 20-year lows. Usage was positive YoY during most of 2019, but has oscillated between negative and positive for the last several months. It was positive again this week.

Bank lending rates

  • 1.480 TED spread up +0.26 w/w (graph at link) (new five year high)
  • 0.094 LIBOR up +0.02 w/w (graph at link)

Both TED and LIBOR rose in 2016 to the point where both were usually negatives, with lots of fluctuation. Of importance is that TED was above 0.50 before both the 2001 and 2008 recessions. After being whipsawed between being positive or negative in 2018, since early 2019 the TED spread remained positive - until this week, when one week ago it turned negative again. LIBOR has been negative and remains so.

Coincident indicators

Restaurant reservations YoY (from Open Table)

  • Mar 19 -92%
  • Mar 26 -100%

I will update this for the duration of the coronavirus outbreak. The last day that restaurant reservations were positive YoY was February 24. The sharp break downward began on March 9.

Consumer spending

  • Johnson Redbook up +9.1% YoY (15 month high)
  • Retail Economist +2.8% w/w, +2.9% YoY

Both the Retail Economist and Johnson Redbook Indexes were positive all during 2018. The Retail Economist measure decelerated early in 2019. Since last May, it has varied between neutral and weakly positive Surprisingly, this week both measures were still very positive - presumably one week "after" stocking up on necessities supposedly took place. If these remain positive next week, something very puzzling and unexpected is going on.

Transport

Railroads (from the AAR)

  • Carloads down -5.4% YoY
  • Intermodal units down -11.4% YoY
  • Total loads down -8.6% YoY

(Graph at Railfax Report - North American Rail Freight Traffic Carloading Report)

Shipping transport

In autumn 2018 rail started to weaken precipitously, probably due to tariffs. It rebounded strongly in January 2019, but since then has been almost uniformly negative, and worsened. Two weeks ago I wrote that “disruption in the supply chain might only result in YoY comparisons remaining negative, but any intensification in the YoY downturn would be a sign of supply chain disruption.” That has happened doe the past three weeks.

Harpex made new three-year highs in mid-2019, and remained near those highs until the beginning of this year. It has declined about 75 points. BDI traced a similar trajectory, making new three-year highs into September 2019, then declining to new three-year lows at the beginning of February. It remains above those lows, but is still a negative. I would expect international shipping disruptions due to coronavirus to result in new lows in prices in these two measures.

I am wary of reading too much into price indexes like this, since they are heavily influenced by supply (as in, a huge overbuilding of ships in the last decade) as well as demand.

Steel production (from the American Iron and Steel Institute)

  • Down -1.4% w/w
  • Down -3.2% YoY

Beginning in spring 2018, this was positive. In 2019 the YoY comparison abruptly declined to less than 1/2 of its top range over 10% YoY, and was neutral generally during summer 2019. By autumn, it was almost exclusively negative. the beginning of this year. It was generally positive since the beginning of this year, but in the last four weeks has turned negative again.

Summary And Conclusion

Among the coincident indicators, both measures of consumer spending and tax withholding are positive. Harpex is neutral. The Baltic Dry Index, rail, steel, restaurant reservations, and the TED spread and LIBOR are negative.

Among the short leading indicators, gas and oil prices and gas usage are positives, as is the broad US$. Stock prices are neutral. Temporary staffing, the spread between corporate and Treasury bonds, the US$ against major currencies, initial claims, the regional Fed new orders indexes, the Chicago Financial Conditions Index, and both industrial and overall commodities are negative.

The situation remains different - but volatile - among the long leading indicators. Treasuries, mortgage rates, the yield curve, real M1 and real M2, real estate loans, and mortgage refinancing are all positives. Mortgage refinancing turned neutral. Corporate bonds remain neutral. Corporate profits are negative, as are purchase mortgage applications, the Adjusted Chicago Financial Conditions Index and its Leverage subindex.

Both the nowcast and the short-term forecast are decisively negative. The long-term forecast, which had been positive, has softened to just above neutral.

We still have not seen the negative coronavirus impacts in all metrics (especially consumer spending and tax withholding). If spending does not turn negative next week, that will be of heightened interest (are people sitting at home, buying online?!?).

This article was written by

New Deal Democrat profile picture
3.43K Followers
New Deal democrat As a professional who started an individual investor for almost 30 yeas ago, I quickly focused on economic cycles and the order in which they typically proceed. I have been writing about the economy for nearly 15 of those years, developing several alternate systems that include mid-cycle, long leading, short leading, coincident, lagging and long lagging indicators. I also focus particularly on their effects on average working and middle class Americans.
Follow

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Recommended For You

Comments (3)

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.