Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Lag In This Down Market

Summary

  • The S&P 500 Aristocrats are companies in the S&P 500 Index that have increased their dividend each year for at least 25 consecutive years.
  • The S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats generally hold up better in broader market pullbacks.
  • As economic activity resumes, it may be the Aristocrats that outperform since the stock basket is overweight in some of the economically sensitive sectors like industrials, materials.

A favorable characteristic of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats is this basket of stocks generally holds up better in broader market pullbacks as seen in the below table. Where the entire row is highlighted, it represents a significant market pullback and the Aristocrats outperformed the S&P 500 Index by double digits.

The S&P 500 Aristocrats are companies in the S&P 500 Index that have increased their dividend each year for at least 25 consecutive years. The companies are then equally weighted in the Dividend Aristocrats Index. I have written about the Aristocrats several times in the past with a more comprehensive article at this link.

In the pullback triggered by the virus induced shutdowns on February 19, 2020, the Aristocrats did not hold up better than the broader S&P 500 Index. The below chart compares the Aristocrats return to the S&P 500 Index for various time periods as of April 30, 2020. For the 3-month period ending in April the Aristocrats underperformed the S&P 500 Index by 3.66 percentage points and trail the index by more than 6.00 percentage points for the 12-months ending in April.

Due to the increasing dividend requirement over a consecutive 25 year period, the Aristocrat portfolio ends up with a significant overweight and/or underweight in some sectors. For the three month period ending in April the discretionary sector was the largest detractor from the Aristocrats performance led by no position in Amazon (AMZN). For the one year period, the information technology sector contributed just over 4.00 percentage points to the Aristocrats underperformance.

Overall, the information technology sector weight equals 1.5% versus the weight in S&P 500 Index of 22%. Communication services is also a large underweight for the Aristocrats at 2% versus 10% in the S&P 500 Index, not surprisingly Alphabet (GOOG) (

This article was written by

HORAN Capital Advisors is an SEC registered investment advisor that manages investment portfolios for individuals and institutions. Our firm utilizes a disciplined investing approach that should create wealth for our clients over time. Our investment bias is to invest in companies that generate a steady return over time, i.e., singles and doubles. This singles and doubles approach tends to lead to investments in higher quality dividend growth/cash flow growth companies. On the other hand, there are times when a company's stock price seems to be trading below its fair valuation. Short term gains are possible in these situations. I have been managing investment portfolios for individuals and institutions for over fifteen years and believe investing is like running a marathon and not a sprint. Taking the road less traveled, more often than not, leads to higher returns. Visit: The Blog of HORAN Capital Advisors at (https://horanwealth.com/insights/market-commentary-blog)

Recommended For You

Comments (3)

OlderThanDirtDave profile picture
Out of curiosity does the performance chart include dividends paid for the Dividend Aristocrats or only appreciation?
David I. Templeton, CFA profile picture
Includes dividends, i.e., total return
OlderThanDirtDave profile picture
Thanks!
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!

Related Stocks

SymbolLast Price% Chg
SPY--
SPDR® S&P 500 ETF Trust
VOO--
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
SH--
ProShares Short S&P500 ETF
IVV--
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
IVE--
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF

Related Analysis

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.