Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Why International Investments Still Matter

May 08, 2020 3:49 AM ETIHDG1 Comment
WisdomTree profile picture
WisdomTree
5.1K Followers

Summary

  • U.S. multinational companies have revenue generated all over the world, so what if diversification is just a matter of "de-worseifying" and bringing suboptimal outcomes?
  • However, we believe there are long-run benefits of investing globally.
  • There are strong parallels to "growth" dominating "value" within the U.S. markets when looking at foreign markets versus the U.S.

One question we are often asked is, "Why bother with international investments?" U.S. multinational companies have revenue generated all over the world, so what if diversification is just a matter of "de-worseifying" and bringing suboptimal outcomes?

I understand this concern, considering that for a long stretch of time, the U.S. has outperformed the rest of the world. Over the past 10 years ending April 30, the MSCI USA Index has outperformed the MSCI EAFE Index by more than 140%.1

However, we believe there are long-run benefits of investing globally.

There are strong parallels to "growth" dominating "value" within the U.S. markets when looking at foreign markets versus the U.S.

Standard market cap-weighted international indexes have sector exposures akin to U.S. value benchmarks, particularly the lack of technology sector exposure and overweight position to financials and commodity-dependent sectors.

But not all international strategies have these sector tilts.

The WisdomTree international quality dividend growth strategy has a sector balance closer to the S&P 500, particularly being overweight in technology versus the MSCI EAFE Index and providing meaningful weights to the health care and consumer sectors. In shifting the weight away from traditional value benchmarks, it also has little exposure to sectors that are typically value heavyweights, such as energy and financials.

We believe screening for profitability, low leverage and earnings growth creates a valuation profile that is more attractive than broader international benchmarks.

Yes, the MSCI EAFE Index is less expensive than the S&P 500 on a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio basis (by about four points), but the S&P 500 has a return on equity (ROE) that is 50% greater, profit margins that are 40% higher and less leverage. These higher margins and profitability ratios warrant the premium multiple of the S&P 500.

By contrast, when one focuses on these profitability and growth metrics

This article was written by

WisdomTree profile picture
5.1K Followers
In 2006, WisdomTree launched with a big idea and an impressive mission — to create a better way to invest. We believed investors shouldn’t have to choose between cost efficiency and performance potential, so we developed the first family of ETFs designed to deliver both. Today, WisdomTree offers a leading product range that offers access to an unparalleled selection of unique and smart exposures.

Recommended For You

Comments (1)

Retired Investor profile picture
While I agree some International exposure adds benefits, data says those benefits are less than they use to be. seekingalpha.com/...
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.