Cortexyme (CRTX) Investor Presentation - Slideshow

SA Transcripts
140.57K Followers
The following slide deck was published by Cortexyme, Inc. in conjunction with this event.

125
This article was written by
Seeking Alpha's transcripts team is responsible for the development of all of our transcript-related projects. We currently publish thousands of quarterly earnings calls per quarter on our site and are continuing to grow and expand our coverage. The purpose of this profile is to allow us to share with our readers new transcript-related developments. Thanks, SA Transcripts Team
Recommended For You
Comments (17)
l

Gordon Gecko was a Commie
07 Dec. 2020
@licowboy - with the GAIN study passing its interim look, we will need to wait 1 year for the final trial results. In theory, the data would be stronger at 1 year vs 6 months if Pg behaves like most bacteria. The longer you starve the pathogen for nutrition, the better the host (the AD patient) should get. Also, placebo patients will decline further, creating a larger delta between drug vs. placebo. If it works that is...
l
licowboy
07 Dec. 2020
Yes, patience required on this speculative long shot. But the science is compelling and as you've stated @Gordon Gecko was a Commie , IF it pans out, the market is huge.

a
adlib666
04 Jun. 2020
Key "red flags" and unanswered questions:
1) Why raise money now (>$200M on hand)?
2) Most of the data are from mice (or from non-primary human cells). Biotech/pharma companies have cured diseases in mice many times before. Why is this strong evidence?
3) Open-label study in the GAIN Phase II/III study. Why open-label?
1) Why raise money now (>$200M on hand)?
2) Most of the data are from mice (or from non-primary human cells). Biotech/pharma companies have cured diseases in mice many times before. Why is this strong evidence?
3) Open-label study in the GAIN Phase II/III study. Why open-label?

Gordon Gecko was a Commie
04 Jun. 2020
1) good question. they have previously stated that they have enough cash to get them through to the end of the GAIN trial. CRTX also recently mentioned that they are looking at an external opportunity to in-license. perhaps that is the reason for the mixed shelf offering. Also, the mixed shelf offering seems to include multiple changes to corporate by-laws that are designated as anti-takeoever. I could interpret that to mean that they are very confident GAIN is going well, and don't want to be taken over prematurely. Perhaps they have even had such inquiries.
2) actually their ph1 data in humans was quite tantalizing (small numbers, but cognitive measures increased in treated group). The mice data is potentially significant primarily in that multiple groups have been able to induce AD in wild type mice by introducing Pg. No one has ever done something like that before.
3) I think you are mixing up their actual ph2b/3 GAIN trial (randomized, controlled, blinded) with their OLE (Open Label Extension). The OLE allows patients who have completed 1 year in the blinded trial but who received placebo to start taking the high dose of COR388. great way to get some additional data.
2) actually their ph1 data in humans was quite tantalizing (small numbers, but cognitive measures increased in treated group). The mice data is potentially significant primarily in that multiple groups have been able to induce AD in wild type mice by introducing Pg. No one has ever done something like that before.
3) I think you are mixing up their actual ph2b/3 GAIN trial (randomized, controlled, blinded) with their OLE (Open Label Extension). The OLE allows patients who have completed 1 year in the blinded trial but who received placebo to start taking the high dose of COR388. great way to get some additional data.
a
adlib666
04 Jun. 2020
@Gordon Gecko was a Commie Is there info on shareholder ownerships currently (by % before the new offering)? Haven't found the info. Alzheimer's clinical trial PhI data are often quite OK. But, Phase III is critical as always. Not a believer when "data in mice" look good. Humans are not "big mice" so-to-speak. This is especially true in the field of neuroscience.

Sierra Monolith Investments
04 Jun. 2020
Pfizer =pole position, Eli Lilly = #2 car
"Not a believer when "data in mice" look good. Humans are not "big mice" so-to-speak. This is especially true in the field of neuroscience."When targeting host mechanisms your statement garners widespread agreement, however COR388 targets an exogenous pathogen.
"Not a believer when "data in mice" look good. Humans are not "big mice" so-to-speak. This is especially true in the field of neuroscience."When targeting host mechanisms your statement garners widespread agreement, however COR388 targets an exogenous pathogen.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!