- The long-term history of the stock market shows that growth stocks do not always dominate.
- Despite the duration of the current large-cap growth run, for the 41-plus-year history of the Russell Indexes, the small-cap value index has managed to maintain a modest lead over large-cap growth: 11.4% vs. 11.1% annualized (1979-March 2020).
- Growth stocks seem to be holding up relatively well during this period as growth sectors continue to function at or near pre-recession capacities.
- However, the rest of the economy will eventually start recovering, and history has demonstrated that coming out of such periods, market leadership can and often does change.
The growth-versus-value debate continues, and the growth voices have gotten stronger given the decade-plus run of large-cap growth names. However, we all know that investing decisions should not be based solely on what has been working recently. Investing decisions should be based on multiple considerations, and this blog post looks at three that should probably influence growth and value positioning moving forward:
- Markets tend to run in cycles.
- Long-term history suggests that value has a role.
- Coming out of difficult economic periods, small and value stocks have historically led market recoveries.
Markets tend to run in cycles: Growth stocks have dominated over the past 10 years
U.S. large-cap stocks have been on a historically strong run relative to the rest of the stock market. The style box below shows how much large growth has dominated the other styles over the 10 years ending March 31, 2020.
Large Cap: Russell 200 Growth Index, Russell 200 Index, Russell 200 Value Index, Mid-Cap: Russell Midcap Growth Index, Russell Midcap Index, Russell Midcap Value Index; Small Cap: Russell 2000 Growth Index, Russell 2000 Index, Russell 2000 Value Index
When market leadership lasts this long and the spreads become this wide, it can cause investors to rethink their diversified strategies. Is it time to jump on the large-cap growth story and abandon smaller value stocks? For those that have been investing for a while, this narrative may sound familiar. Below is the same chart for the ten years ending December 31, 1999, maybe the ultimate period for large-cap growth investors. The pattern below looks very similar to the last 10 years.
The '90s were a great 10-year run for all U.S. equity participants, but investors still were questioning whether to abandon diversification and pursue strategies heavily dominated by large-cap growth stocks. For those that stuck to their disciplines, they were richly rewarded over the next 10 years, with small-cap value stocks beating large-cap growth by over 200%. For those that gave up on value stocks, they saw large-cap growth stocks lose 4.8% per year over the next 10 years.
A 10-year stretch is a significant time period in any investor's horizon. A pattern that endures this long tempts investors to gravitate to it as the new normal. But as we look back at the '90s, it was such an obvious bubble in hindsight, and the following growth stock disappointment shouldn't have been surprising. Will we be saying the same thing 10 years from now about the current stretch? History suggests we may...
Long-term history suggests that value has a role
The long-term history of the stock market shows that growth stocks do not always dominate. Despite the duration of the current large-cap growth run, for the 41-plus-year history of the Russell Indexes, the small-cap value index (Russell 2000 Value Index) has managed to maintain a modest lead over large-cap growth (Russell 200 Growth Index): 11.4% vs. 11.1% annualized (1979-March 2020). Looking longer term, the Fama/French stock market research returns have their own value and growth streams which date to the late 1920s. If one links that data to the Russell Indexes, the advantage of small value relative to large-cap growth grows to over 3.0% per year (12.5% vs. 9.2%), annualized back to 1930.
The long-term impact of this history is not adequately portrayed by the 3.2% annual spread. For someone that was able to invest $1,000 in 1930 and invested it all in the large-cap growth portfolio, it grew to an impressive amount of over $2,800,000. That's the power of compounding 9%-plus a year over 90 years. However, if that same investor had put that $1,000 in a small value portfolio, it would have grown to over $56,000,000. That's the power of compounding at over 12% per year for 90 years, and a reminder of why so many seasoned investors swear on the long-term benefits of small-cap and value stocks.
Coming out of difficult economic periods, small and value stocks have historically led market recoveries
Also influencing the future direction of the markets is that we are in the midst of an economic recession. Growth stocks seem to be holding up relatively well during this period as growth sectors continue to function at or near pre-recession capacities. However, the rest of the economy will eventually start recovering, and history has demonstrated that coming out of such periods, market leadership can and often does change. Here is what the average leadership has looked like for the five years coming out of the last four recessions that were accompanied by a 30%-plus market correction:
Large Cap Growth: Fama/French Big Growth Portfolio 1930 -1978 linked to Russell 200 Growth Index 1979 - March 31, 2020; Large Cap Value: Fama/French Big Value Portfolio 1920-1978 linked to Russell 200 Value Index 1979 - 2020 March 31, 2020; Small Cap Growth: Fama/French Small Growth Portfolio 1930 -1978 linked to Russell 2000 Growth Index 1979 - March 31, 2020; Small Cap Value: Fama/French Small Value Portfolio 1920-1978 linked to Russell 2000 Value Index 1979 - 2020 March 31, 2020
These results shouldn't surprise investors that follow market behavior, as markets tend to run in cycles and leadership changes often occur at economic inflection points.
- This has been a great run for large-cap growth stocks, but markets run in cycles. The late '90s and the 10 years that followed should be a good reminder.
- Long-term history suggests that value and small-cap stocks tend to win over time. That certainly does not guarantee the same results going forward, but it does suggest abandoning such names may be a regrettable decision.
- We are in the middle of a recession. Coming out of recessions, equities tend to produce strong results. However, large-cap growth stocks have trailed other market segments, on average, during those periods.
With these in mind, how should investors be thinking about and positioning U.S. equity portfolios?
- Will the large-cap growth trend maintain its momentum?
- It is possible that the current large-cap momentum continues for a while. However, to believe it will go on forever seems misguided, based upon experience. A more balanced profile including value and smaller-cap names will likely be rewarded as markets tend to revert to their historical relationships.
- Coming out of the recession and the yet-to-be determined market bottom, what exposures will likely serve the portfolio best?
- Fortunately, we have limited experience over the last 40 years of coming off a recession tied to a 30%-plus market correction. However, during those last four occasions, smaller securities tended to lead relative to larger-growth names. Diversifying away from the large-growth names that have been dominating market results may benefit investors as the market begins to accelerate out of our current challenges.
- Should this influence how investors think about active and passive positioning?
- It has been a difficult stretch for active managers, as they tend to underweight the largest, most highly valued stocks in the market. Fundamental approaches tend to seek less-efficient market opportunities further down in the cap spectrum. An environment in which smaller, value-oriented securities lead may be a more friendly market environment for active managers.
It can be difficult when one segment of the market leaves the rest behind. The temptation to follow the trend and abandon more diversified mixes can be very high, leading to classic buy high investor behavior. It is impossible to predict what comes next from the current market environment, but having diverse exposure to all segments of the market will provide investors with the opportunity to participate.
Russell Top 200® Index measures the performance of the largest cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell Top 200 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index. It includes approximately 200 of the largest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership and represents approximately 68% of the U.S. market.
Russell Top 200® Growth Index offers measures the performance of the especially large cap segment of the U.S. equity universe represented by stocks in the largest 200 by market cap that exhibit growth characteristics. It includes Russell Top 200 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecast growth values. The companies also are members of the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
Russell 200® Value Index measures the performance of small-cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 2000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the mid-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell Midcap Index is a subset of the Russell 1000® Index. It includes approximately 800 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Russell Midcap Index represents approximately 31% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 1000 companies.
Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of the mid-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell Midcap Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of the mid-cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell Midcap Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2000 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership.
Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of the small-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 2000 companies with higher price-to-value ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of small-cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 2000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
Performance quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results.
Indices and benchmarks are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Returns represent past performance, are not a guarantee of future performance, and are not indicative of any specific investment. Index return information is provided by vendors and although deemed reliable, is not guaranteed by Russell Investments or its affiliates. Due to timing of information, indices may be adjusted after the publication of this report.
These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and are current as of the date at the top of the page. The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual or entity.
This material is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation to purchase any security.
Forecasting represents predictions of market prices and/or volume patterns utilizing varying analytical data. It is not representative of a projection of the stock market, or of any specific investment.
Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Please remember that all investments carry some level of risk, including the potential loss of principal invested. They do not typically grow at an even rate of return and may experience negative growth. As with any type of portfolio structuring, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns.
The information, analysis and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual entity.
Russell Investments' ownership is composed of a majority stake held by funds managed by TA Associates with minority stakes held by funds managed by Reverence Capital Partners and Russell Investments' management.
Frank Russell Company is the owner of the Russell trademarks contained in this material and all trademark rights related to the Russell trademarks, which the members of the Russell Investments group of companies are permitted to use under license from Frank Russell Company. The members of the Russell Investments group of companies are not affiliated in any manner with Frank Russell Company or any entity operating under the "FTSE RUSSELL" brand.
The Russell logo is a trademark and service mark of Russell Investments.
Copyright © 2020 Russell Investments Group, LLC 2020. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and may not be reproduced, transferred, or distributed in any form without prior written permission from Russell Investments. It is delivered on an "as is" basis without warranty.
Russell Investments Financial Services, LLC, member FINRA (www.finra.org), part of Russell Investments.
Editor's Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.
This article was written by