Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Apple: Most Expensive Valuation In A Decade

Aug. 05, 2020 3:04 PM ETApple Inc. (AAPL)202 Comments

Summary

  • On May 13th, 2016, I wrote a public Seeking Alpha article stating that Apple was trading at its cheapest valuation in a decade.
  • The total return for AAPL shares since that articles publication has been over 415%, with the S&P 500 Index up roughly 62% over this time frame.
  • Apple's valuation ratios have gone from trading at discounts to the market to severely overvalued relative to the market.
  • Valuations and Apple's sheer size are going to serve as enormous headwind for current shareholders.
  • Thus, today is a perfect time to use Apple as a market hedge on the short side.
  • This idea was discussed in more depth with members of my private investing community, The Contrarian. Get started today »

"I will go to my grave... believing that really loose monetary policy greatly contributed to the Financial Crisis. There were obviously problems with regulation, but when we had a 1% Fed Funds rate in 2003 after, to me, it was pretty obvious that the economy had turned (up) and I think the economy was growing at 7% to 9% nominal in the fourth quarter of 2003 and that wasn't enough for the Fed. They had this little thing called 'considerable period' on top of the 1% rate just so we would make sure that their meaning was clear. And it was all wrapped around this concept of an insurance cut… I've made some money predicting boom-bust cycles. It's what I do. Sometimes I am right. Sometimes I am wrong, but every bust I had ever seen was proceeded by an asset bubble generally set up by too loose policy..." - Stanley Druckenmiller

(Source: Image From Author's May 2016 Seeking Alpha Apple Article)

Introduction:

On May 13th, 2016, I wrote a public Seeking Alpha article stating that Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was trading at its cheapest valuation in a decade. The total return for AAPL shares since that article's publication was over 415%, with the S&P 500 Index up roughly 62% over this time frame.

(Source: Author, Seeking Alpha)

More recently, I have turned somewhat bearish on AAPL shares, especially as the company has continued its climb towards the $2 trillion market capitalization mark.

In fact, earlier this year, I purchased January 2021 puts on Apple shares, and then on February 28th, 2020, I cashed these puts in for a healthy gain on February 28th, 2020, which was too early with the benefit of hindsight, even though I wrote publicly about the risks of COVID-19, including this article, titled "Two Black

The Contrarian

There is historic opportunity in the investment markets today.  I have spent thousands of hours analyzing the markets, looking for the best opportunities, looking to replicate what I have been able to accomplish in the past.  From my perspective, the opportunities in targeted out-of-favor equities today are every bit as big as the best opportunities in early 2016, and late 2008/early 2009.  For further perspective on these opportunities, consider a membership to The Contrarian, sign up here to join.

This article was written by

KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
27.65K Followers

KCI Research, aka Travis, has been a financial professional for over 20 years. Formerly a director of research at a mid-sized RIA, and one of four strategic investment decision makers at one of the largest RIA's in the United States, Travis founded his own boutique investment firm in February of 2009. He specializes in against grain investing backed by real-world wisdom and experience by targeting out-of-favor, contrarian investment opportunities.

Travis is the leader of the investment group Learn More.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I am/we are short spy in a long/short portfolio, I plan on shorting aapl shares again via put options in the next 72 hours, and I am long AR. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Every investor's situation is different. Positions can change at any time without warning. Please do your own due diligence and consult with your financial advisor, if you have one, before making any investment decisions. The author is not acting in an investment adviser capacity. The author's opinions expressed herein address only select aspects of potential investment in securities of the companies mentioned and cannot be a substitute for comprehensive investment analysis. The author recommends that potential and existing investors conduct thorough investment research of their own, including detailed review of the companies' SEC filings. Any opinions or estimates constitute the author's best judgment as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (202)

You could have bought ANY puts in Jan 2020 and done well.
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
It is only one day, actually a two-day correction, however, wow...

seekingalpha.com/...

WTK
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
Hmm...a butterfly flaps its wings.

seekingalpha.com/...

Something to monitor as we wait for the reversion to the mean,

WTK
l
P/E 33+ is just madness
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
@ludicrous_display

It is all a function of most market participants believing long-term interest rates only go lower.

WTK
Bossco profile picture
@ludicrous_display - A whole lotta other fundamentals to look into beside P/E. Revenue, revenue per share, EBITDA, Total cash per share, etc., etc., etc.

Besides, isn't "madness" a relative concept? Shall we glean from your post that you're not investing in TSLA, AMD, CRM, NFLX, AMZN, V...?

Cheers ;-)!
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
@Bossco

Yes.

Growth, after 14 years of outperformance, does not look attractive, IMO.

Best of luck,

WTK
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
All - Update 8/10/2020

Here is an analyst upgrade today where the analyst upgrades AAPL's price target to a street leading $600 per share.

seekingalpha.com/...

This is all short-term thinking, with the focus on a one phone upgrade cycle, instead of looking at the bigger picture, at least, IMO.

WTK
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
This was a nice link from a reader on AAPL's price-to-free cash flow.

www.macrotrends.net/...

WTK
All*AAPL profile picture
@KCI Research Ltd. said:

===

"I have spent thousands of hours analyzing the markets, looking for the best opportunities, looking to replicate what I have been able to accomplish in the past."

===

***You must love what you do. I've spent *minutes* buying shares of AAPL between 2000 and 2008, more *minutes* during that period telling my Charles Schwab advisor why I didn't want to diversify our 100% AAPL portfolio and tens of *hours* reading/commenting on an AAPL forum and Seeking Alpha. I will admit to being "lucky" for the last 20 years, but it's luck that's happened for *many* AAPL Longs, some right here on Seeking Alpha.

I would wish *you* luck, but since you'll be shorting AAPL, I'll just hope you only invest money that you don't mind losing.
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
@All*AAPL

First, congratulations on your success with AAPL.

Second, remember that even the best stocks, and the best operating companies, think of MSFT for the past 20 years (I know hard to do for an AAPL fanatic), can lose 50%, or 70% of their market value from a peak, and go nowhere for 14 years, which is roughly what MSFT shares did from 2000-2014, even though they were growing revenues, net income, and free cash flows on a consistent basis.

WTK
Bigtex21 profile picture
Excellent post.

I do believe, however, you mean "commensurate" vs. "commiserate."
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
@Bigtex21

You are correct.

Also, for a bigger picture view, anyone reading this article, should check out this article I posted today.

seekingalpha.com/...

WTK
Seekingbuddah profile picture
Having been investing for 20 years and an Apple share holder since 2007 I’ve only made money on Apple. My biggest mistakes with Apple have only been from selling it. Had I keep my original positions in 2012 I would have 17.85 million today with annual dividend of $130k/yr at the current rate. I’m still an Apple millionaire but far from the numbers above...so no real complaints...just missed opportunities....I’m a contrarian investor who now loads up on Apple every time the Market is in panic mode...I don’t fear anytime Apple stock gets punished down which I’ve seen many times. Corrections, market sentiments, world events just provide opportunities to buy Apple, it will always comes back up. A great American world company with fantastic leadership, technology, services, and huge ecosystem moat unlike any company on Earth. Long AAPL
All*AAPL profile picture
@Seekingbuddah said:

===

"...I’m a contrarian investor who now loads up on Apple every time the Market is in panic mode...I don’t fear anytime Apple stock gets punished down which I’ve seen many times. Corrections, market sentiments, world events just provide opportunities to buy Apple, it will always comes back up. A great American world company with fantastic leadership, technology, services, and huge ecosystem moat unlike any company on Earth. Long AAPL"

===

***If you published this short paragraph as an article on Seeking Alpha, it would be the absolute best, most concisely-written advice for those who are reluctant to invest in AAPL long term. Nicely stated.
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
@Seekingbuddah

First, congratulations on your success.

Second, AAPL is part of a historically overvalued market.

seekingalpha.com/...

The key is to look forward, not backwards,

WTK
E
This author makes too much sense in these euphoric times. The Nasdaq has been relentless. If you are already long Apple and have made a boatload - stay long and let it ride. But what fool would buy it after the run it’s had? And I love AAPL products but this is just too much.
rrkaas profile picture
Hard to dispute the numbers with overvaluation like you suggested using rational thinking. My largest position, holding through the splits. And yet I added some more recently and here we are 6% above that price as it moves closer to $500. Good perspective and I’ll be re-evaluating things post split. But I have a feeling another stimulus round will drive sales higher.
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
@rrkaas

I understand the perspective, however, you have to think long-term here, not short-term.

seekingalpha.com/...

WTK
InvestingIdeas profile picture
The comment section in MSFT and AAPL articles is incredible, they continue to grow at similar paces compared to the last 7-8 years and yet the earnings multiples have gone from high teens to mid 30's and upward.

This time cannot be different because if earnings matter at any point in the future weather it be 1 month, 5 years or 10 years then these companies have to regress down or trade sideways for 5-10 years
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
@Tom Szczypka

Starting valuations are immensely important for future returns.

WTK
@KCI Research Ltd. The price at which a stock *used to be* is immaterial, unless you just enjoy looking backward. X used to be $180. That tells us nothing about investing in X today.
c
Overvalued? -- well, today's volume was 50m plus. Obviously, more Buyers than Sellers. I guess 'value' is in the eyes of the beholder.
T
KCI Research Ltd. - Thanks for the thoughtful article, but there are many misconceptions on your part here. I will comment on just some of them:

"Apple's valuation ratios have gone from trading at discounts to the market to severely overvalued relative to the market."

- Apple is not overvalued relative to the market. its PE (as of the day of you writing this article) is just shy of 34. Thats about what Google's PE is (you know, that company that keeps underwhelming with earnings and in the crosshairs of major govt's worldwide), less than the PE of Microsoft, and just a bit above the PE of companies like Clorox and Pepsi.

"Apple's sheer size are going to serve as enormous headwind for current shareholders."

- The 'law of large #s' was the bears case years ago, explaining why Apple would never get to 1 Trillion valuation. Good morning! Apple is almost at 2 Trillion, and on the way to 3 Trillion. This is a made up concept.

" Apple Is A Terrific Company That Is Significantly Overvalued"

- To add the word 'significantly' makes your analysis all the more suspect. So I guess you are saying, that the company with such a great shareholder return program, consistent EPS double digit growth, mostly upward surprises, an ecosystem and moat unparalleled in history, brand name unmatched in history, with 1 billion and growing of the worlds wealthiest and loayal customers in their pocket, with almost unlimited near/medium/and long term new revenue possibilities......should have the PE of a vacuum company?!
L
@TurboRocker

"The 'law of large #s' was the bears case years ago, explaining why Apple would never get to 1 Trillion valuation."

I never get tired of hearing people claim the 'law of large numbers' as a reason Apple is done. They never cease to be wrong, and I never stop laughing... and yet they never issue a mea culpa. Strange, really.
Diesel profile picture
<<< Apple is not overvalued relative to the market. its PE (as of the day of you writing this article) is just shy of 34. >>>

That's very low. Apple's ~5% annual growth rate deserves a P/E of at least 100 if not more.
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
@TurboRocker

I understand your perspective, however, consider the market environment that Apple resides in.

seekingalpha.com/...

WTK
t
Imagine having sold Apple a decade ago because you thought it was expensive.

Don’t make that mistake now.
Downtown10 profile picture
No company’s stock is immune from a sustained sell-off. For years IBM was the Apple of it’s time. The FAANG stocks look like they are unchallengeable right now. But the world is constantly undergoing change. It’s almost impossible to stay on top over multiple decades. You can pretty much guarantee that 10 years from now some, if not most, of these companies will not be among the highest 10 market cap co’s.
Diesel profile picture
<<< Imagine having sold Apple a decade ago because you thought it was expensive. >>>

A decade ago Apple had a 25% growth rate with a P/E of 25. Today it has 5% growth rate with a P/E of 35.
m
-- "No company’s stock is immune from a sustained sell-off. For years IBM was the Apple of it’s time."

@Downtown10 - When did IBM selloff? Don't think it did. It went stagnant and flatlined. Big difference.
L
The real magic is reducing the share count, much more valuable than dividend. Say Company A makes EPS $1 and stock trades at $10 (10 multiple) and is contemplating paying 50% special dividend or buying back shares. With the dividend option you get 50% and after tax would be ~35-40% net. With the buyback option, share count is reduced 50% FOREVER, so EPS increases to $2, so stock trades at $20 with the same multiple, so a double. But it gets even better. Now the market thinks Company A is a high growth company (EPS doubles, sometime Media is loose with the terms and just says earnings doubled and don't mention the Per Share part), and multiple rerated from 10x to 20x, so now stock is at $40 - a four fold increase with tax effiency. How about that, magic. Now welcome to the S&P 500 play book of the last decade, perfect example AAPL. Many other companies think this secret sauce is so good that they have loaded on record debt to buy back even more shares.
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
@Lgila1981

Financial engineering. It works until it does not.

WTK
@Lgila1981 Stock buybacks create no value, no innovation, and no new products. Rearranging the balance sheet creates zero growth, which is the one and only driver of value.
@KCI Research Ltd. Actually, rearranging the balance sheet doesn't add value, ever.
L
This is the most expensive valuation on fake/manufactured EPS. If you base it on buyback adjusted share count, it's trading at 70x fwd PE. Crazy for a Sharper Image company.
T
"I pity da fool, that shorts apple".

Freely adapted from the late, great Mr. T.
d
"It should be no surprise that Morningstar had a $285 fair value target on AAPL shares as of July 31st, 2020, which is a tidy 32.9% below Apple's recent closing price."

I have calculated virtually the exact same fair value which is why I am hedging a little over half my position with puts and some PSQ as well. No one can predict when the insanity will end only that it will definitely end.
KCI Research Ltd. profile picture
@dstb

It has definitely gone on for a long time.

WTK
Oilcadaver profile picture
1. COVID. is not Black Swan. Never been. You got N Taleb wrong!

2. I didnt get it, for what reason in Apple post we need to pay attention on Pepsi and it's market valuation? Thank you!
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.