Warning Signs For Tesla And The Stock Market
Summary
- Rising bond rates don’t mean good things for the stock market.
- One-time gross margin issues for Tesla need to be watched to make sure it’s not a pattern.
- Auto companies’ pain is semiconductors' and chip makers’ gain.
- Respect the market.
- Looking for a helping hand in the market? Members of Nail Tech Earnings get exclusive ideas and guidance to navigate any climate. Get started today »
Last week’s stock market action has people throughout the market asking questions. I think we always need to respect the market and the directions that it’s taking. The bond market especially is smart. So when rates rise like they do, it’s something we need to pay attention to closely.
I love Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) as a company, but rising rates and one-time issues for their gross margins last quarter are also important to watch. I’m not ready to look to 2022 earnings, so the company is in an in-between valuation stage. And the semiconductor shortage that is hitting the whole auto industry could affect them too.
I talk about both issues in the video above. I also talk about a semiconductor company I like as a result of the auto industry issues and general supply tightness. Limited supply and high demand equals good things for Micron (MU).
Full contents:
Market outlook – The recent sell-off and why it makes sense - 00:30-10:45
The increasing risks in the market, driven by bond rates and inflation
High PCE report as a warning sign
The bond market’s push for higher rates despite the Fed’s efforts
The power of momentum and algorithms, with GameStop as an example
What’s the near-term outlook and direction for the market
Stock Focus – Concerns for Tesla – 10:45-18:15
One-time issues in the Q4 report around gross margins
The importance of gross margins to the Tesla story
Semiconductor shortage and interruptions to the delivery story for Tesla models
The importance of showing that the Q4 issues were one-time and not recurring
Bonus stock – Micron looking attractive – 18:15-23:00
DRAM pricing driving upside
There may be more room to run than the usual Micron cycle
The importance of zeroing in on the key driver for a given stock
Final thoughts – Respect the down move – 23:00-26:00
- The case for selling down and buying up, selling weakness and buying strength
#1 Tech Stock Pick & Trading Service On SA. Trade Like A Pro.
Raising Annual Prices March 15th
Two Week Free Trial Click Here
Subscribers are saying;
"personal trading account to go up by ~200% since January 2020"
"3 for 3, baby!"
"paid for itself many times over."
This article was written by
Starting out I could make a mean straight black coffee. But ask me to add some sugar or milk though was a problem. So they got fed up and said, just give him some stocks to follow. That was in the 90s tech boom. Yeah. That worked out.
So, now, mid-life crisis I enjoy second guessing the Fed, which is usually a good strategy. They are not traders, they have no risk discipline, they are having way too much fun with this QE-QT thing and because of their powerful position, are usually way too over-confident in their decision making which is a hint to bad decision making.
My customers have seen that I've been net net pretty good at consistently second guessing the Fed.
Our EPS estimates factor into Street numbers.
I've been on CNBC and a few other places.
But mostly I really just enjoy second guessing the Fed and keeping it simple.
Wishing you all continued success.
https://seekingalpha.com/mp/1072-the-fed-trader/articles
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
All investments have many risks and can lose principal in the short and long term. The information provided is for information purposes only and can be wrong. By reading this you agree, understand and accept that you take upon yourself all responsibility for all of your investment decisions and to do your own work and hold Elazar Advisors, LLC, and their related parties harmless. All model portfolio trades are hypothetical to show direction, conviction and timing. Performance excludes all relevant transaction costs. Opinions given are at this moment and can change rapidly after this is published. Elazar and its employees do not take individual stock positions to avoid front running and other potential customer related issues.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Recommended For You
Comments (129)

Here, something tangible for you to chew on
SUBJECT:
THE EV/SALES RATIO TO GAUGE INVESTOR MANIA FOR GROWTH STOCKS
(for a primer on the bull argument watch Cathie Wood from ARK on youtube - hilarious!!
i find this one about disruption technology esp funny, or might one say WACKO !!
www.youtube.com/...OK, BACK TO EV/SALES RATIO TO GAUGE INVESTOR MANIA FOR GROWTH STOCKS
One very valuable metric to show a growth stock's mania is EV/Sales ratio.Over this past year Tesla's EV/Sales ratio has fallen from a peak of 26X,
and after the 25% haircut in the last week, it stands at 21XBYD EV/Sales ratio. has moved (since Tesla's peak of 26) from 5.3X to 4.4X today.Now tell me do you think that is adequate enough of a correction, given the virtually IDENTICAL PROSPECTS going forward
(read this very article for detail)
seekingalpha.com/...Tesla will halve in 2021 and BYD could double; BYD WILL BE +50% UP ON 2021
mark le post


2. The company buys the stock back.
3. The company is bought out. Tesla, Facebook, Alphabet, etc are too big for number 3, without taking a big haircut. Tesla cannot do 2 at current levels, and it would be foolish to do so. 1. Is also not happening anytime soon.Don't try to win a game of musical chairs in the stock market, particularly in the automotive sector, where the multiples should be low to reflect the high level of competition. With GM getting into the game again, with the Mustang taking market share from Tesla, with Tesla getting low marks on one of the recent quality surveys, the multiple should be low, not sky high. With a PEG ratio over 5, growth isn't a sufficient countermeasure. This is a euphoria stock, and the euphoria may be evaporating.
in 2019: 31%
in 2020: 13%
in Jan 21: 5%
in Feb 21: 3.5%
Looks like the competition is starting to wake up big....
I love Tesla and admire Elon Musk but I wonder how a market cap equal to Toyota+VW+Daimler+BYD+GM+NIO+BMW can be sustained over le LT

EV explodes were ICE cars are taxed out of competitiveness. This is California and Europe for the most part. I don't think the U.S. on the whole has the stomach for the strong restrictions/taxes that are needed to move the needle that far. Certain states may follow California's lead (Oregon, Washington, New York?), but in areas where ICE cars are not subject to stronger taxation/regulation expect the transition to be slow and and in some areas non-existent (Wyoming/Dakotas/ etc, rural areas where distance travel is still beyond charging constraints)




Yes a lot of risk taking out there and lots of algos so expect increased vol which is bearish for markets.


Longs over time have done very well. But this period is a problem i think for buy dips for stocks in general.



I like the tip of knowing the "key" metrics to watch, thanks again.

Growth companies are not suppose to have large positive net income. I see no signs of competition yet.





There is no teacher/adviser like experience. People who learn from the experiences of others are very rare.
Yeah, I said the same thing about Tech Stocks in 1998, and look how that turned out! Multiple crashes! I mean, yeah, those people are all rich now and have multiple vacation homes, but they didn't get the safety and security of my dividend payouts. I knew the tech stocks would never amount to much. /s

On the other hand, if you invest properly, you will make money long term consistently, virtually guaranteed.
No use in making money short term if after that that's all...








www.bis.org/...It's going to be awkward going forward. There is a natural tension and a natural disconnect between the expected interest rates under Fed policy and the expected real-world goals of their policy, and I am skeptical that they can keep the lid on for too much longer.

Phi Omega Omega PhiThe market isn’t an entity. No more than capturing light in a jar.

respecting the market means you take price movements seriously and don't easily assume that your ideaa are better than everybody else's because the 'market' is made of everybody including yourself.
Don’t put words in my mouth. That’s disrespectful. If you can’t respect me (one person) and just my statement at that, how can we expect the masses to respect “the Market”? HahahaIn my opinion it doesn’t matter either way, bc the market isn’t an entity. An entity is something ostensible, like a box or a person. A collection of records as to how some people from all over decided to trade or not trade (i.e the market) isn’t the same. The market isn’t an entity. Just like I can’t respect the color red, in general, I can’t respect the market. It isn’t that kind of thing. It’s a concept, of either the day’s, week’s, month’s, year’s record, of how people traded stocks/options etc. At its core “the Market” is just receipts. You could have on Day 1 a market of John Kahn and Luke who all purchased X,Y,Z amounts (respectfully) of stocks Q,P,Z and on Day 2 a market of completely new traders/investors all of which who purchase completely different amounts of completely new stocks. Consequently the various stocks move with respect to how they either were, or were not, traded. If no one buys or sells, any given stock, that stock does not move. In contrast, if more shares are sold of stock Q in total for, say, a day than are purchased, then the overall price per share of Q go down: more shares and less demand. Vice versa, if more shares of Q are purchased than are sold, say, in a given day, then the overall price per share of Q will go up. *This price movement happens instantly and typically each subsequent (presumed) “buyer” is so buying at steadily higher prices, so justifying the actual minute mathematical adjustments throughout the day, of said stock, and vice versa for the case of more volume sales than volume shares purchased. And you could expand further on the minute details I’m just going to not get into those here. Like variety of reasons for why people decide to buy various stocks at the given mathematical prices that they do... The general main point is just prior to the “*”.Back to my example about day 1 and day 2, all the members are different depending on the day, so who would we show our respect to if the market is such a thing deserving respect? See the absurdity? Therefore we can’t respect “the Market” bc its not that kind of thing. “The Market” is supervenient on the participants who vary day to day.... “the Market” is just a collection of receipts essentially. Imagine piling up all your receipts and showing that pile respect. That’s analogous and so equally absurd. I mean just bowing to a pile of paper isn’t respect and you can’t achieve respect for a pile of paper. It isn’t that kind of thing. That’s what I’m saying.



The TSLA price has excelled. The Tesla has not excelled, but I am sure they will in the future.