- Gender diversity in leadership roles has emerged as an important global theme in recent years.
- While still lagging the UK, the US has also made significant strides toward board gender parity in recent years.
- The FTSE 350 Index and Russell 3000 Index are both relatively broad representations of their respective domestic equity markets.
By Carolyn Eagle, Senior Product Manager, Sustainable Investments
Gender diversity in leadership roles has emerged as an important global theme in recent years. Addressing gender equality has become a key focus of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, and more governments are putting regulations in place to promote gender diversity in publicly listed companies. NASDAQ also recently took a major step in advocating for the cause, proposing that the more than 3,000 companies listed on its exchange be required to appoint at least one woman to their boards.
When we first launched our FTSE Women on Boards Leadership Index Series three years ago, board gender diversity had already risen to prominence on government and corporate agendas, but women remained largely underrepresented on corporate boards. And while more recent data indicates corporate boards are still falling short of achieving widespread gender balance, it points to significant progress over the past several years - and much of this has been driven by some of the largest global companies.
Progress across the board
Progress toward equal gender representation on corporate boards has been particularly noteworthy in the UK. Using the FTSE 350 Index constituent companies as a metric for UK progress, a recent Hampton-Alexander Review report found that 34.3% of board positions are now held by women. This is a 50% increase from just five years ago, when women represented only 21.9% of FTSE 350 company board positions.
While still lagging the UK, the US has also made significant strides toward board gender parity in recent years. As shown below, the percentage of women on Russell 3000 Index constituent company boards has risen steadily over the past few years, climbing from 16.0% in 2017 to 22.6% in 2020.
Bigger companies leading by example
The FTSE 350 Index and Russell 3000 Index are both relatively broad representations of their respective domestic equity markets. If we narrow our focus to the 100 largest names in each of these indexes, we can see that size is a key characteristic of the companies driving progress toward gender balance on boards.
As shown below, the 100 largest companies by market capitalization in each of these indexes reported higher percentages of women on boards than their broader counterparts. And if we look at the smaller market cap segments of UK and US equity markets, relatively fewer women were represented on company boards.
Change from the top means convergent index performance
Our FTSE Russell Women on Boards Leadership Index Series methodology aims to identify companies that demonstrate leadership in gender diversity. We adjust constituent weights based on both a Women on Boards ratio2 and a Social Pillar Score - a metric that encompasses a wide range of social issues, including diversity and inclusion indicators.
If we look at the top weighted holdings in these indexes, we can see how the largest companies are primarily the ones performing the best based on our women on boards criteria. As shown below, the FTSE All-Share Women on Boards Leadership Index shares eight of its top 10 holdings with the FTSE All-Share Index, and the Russell 1000 Women on Boards Leadership Index has five overlapping top holdings with the Russell 1000.
These similarities in index composition are driving convergent performance between FTSE Women on Boards Leadership Indexes and their broader index counterparts. As shown, a performance comparison between these two indexes and their respective parent indexes reveals similar returns, particularly over more recent time periods.
Driving behavior change
While recent progress toward gender equality on boards is promising, both the UK and the US still fall short of equal board representation. As long as these imbalances persist, it's clear there's more work to be done. Some might find it encouraging that it's primarily the larger public companies that have made the most progress. One could argue that large companies face greater scrutiny by investors and other stakeholders, but they also tend to have more resources to formalize and communicate policies and practices such as ones around gender diversity at leadership levels. One might hope that the success of those policies can drive the behavior of companies of all sizes.
1. Source: Hampton-Alexander Review FTSE Women Leaders, Improving gender balance - 5-year summary report, February 2021
2. Women on Boards Ratio = ratio of female board members to total number of board members.
© 2021 London Stock Exchange Group plc and its applicable group undertakings (the "LSE Group"). The LSE Group includes (1) FTSE International Limited ("FTSE"), (2) Frank Russell Company ("Russell"), (3) FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Inc. and FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Limited (together, "FTSE Canada"), (4) MTSNext Limited ("MTSNext"), (5) Mergent, Inc. ("Mergent"), (6) FTSE Fixed Income LLC ("FTSE FI"), (7) The Yield Book Inc ("YB") and (8) Beyond Ratings S.A.S. ("BR"). All rights reserved.
FTSE Russell® is a trading name of FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, MTSNext, Mergent, FTSE FI, YB and BR. "FTSE®", "Russell®", "FTSE Russell®", "MTS®", "FTSE4Good®", "ICB®", "Mergent®", "The Yield Book®", "Beyond Ratings®" and all other trademarks and service marks used herein (whether registered or unregistered) are trademarks and/or service marks owned or licensed by the applicable member of the LSE Group or their respective licensors and are owned, or used under licence, by FTSE, Russell, MTSNext, FTSE Canada, Mergent, FTSE FI, YB or BR. FTSE International Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator.
All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by the LSE Group, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability of any information or of results to be obtained from the use of FTSE Russell products, including but not limited to indexes, data and analytics, or the fitness or suitability of the FTSE Russell products for any particular purpose to which they might be put. Any representation of historical data accessible through FTSE Russell products is provided for information purposes only and is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
No responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this document or links to this document or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages whatsoever, even if any member of the LSE Group is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of, or inability to use, such information.
No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice and nothing contained in this document or accessible through FTSE Russell Indexes, including statistical data and industry reports, should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice or a financial promotion.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched. However, back- tested data may reflect the application of the index methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index.
This publication may contain forward-looking assessments. These are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future conditions that ultimately may prove to be inaccurate. Such forward-looking assessments are subject to risks and uncertainties and may be affected by various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially. No member of the LSE Group nor their licensors assume any duty to and do not undertake to update forward-looking assessments.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of the LSE Group. Use and distribution of the LSE Group data requires a licence from FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, MTSNext, Mergent, FTSE FI, YB and/or their respective licensors.
Editor's Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.
This article was written by