- The consensus has been disturbed by inflation fears, raising worries about tighter monetary policy, higher bond yields and the interest rate sensitivity of equity markets.
- When the primary cause of equity market volatility is rising rates, the traditional portfolio diversifiers, government bonds, are unlikely to offer protection.
- At the start of the year, we were concerned about the level of short-term consensus even though we ultimately agreed with broad consensus views over the 12-month horizon of 2021.
By Erik L. Knutzen
We believe more volatility is likely, and think investors should diversify against it but also use it to lean into the new cycle.
As we came into 2021, two big things were on our minds in the Multi-Asset Class team.
The first was the risk inherent in the strong investor consensus for an early cycle recovery as economies reopened and stimulus gained traction.
The second was how this reminded us of the beginning of 2010, a year that started with post-crisis optimism and ended with global equities up by 10%, but also endured a 12% drawdown.
Over recent weeks, our first concern has been justified. The consensus has been disturbed by inflation fears, raising worries about tighter monetary policy, higher bond yields and the interest rate sensitivity of equity markets.
Once a consensus has been challenged, as it was in 2010 by the Eurozone crisis, volatility tends to follow. And while we have experienced some volatility, particularly in Treasuries and interest rate-sensitive large-cap growth stocks, at the stock market index level so far this year we have seen only a 3.5% drawdown at the end of January and a 4% drawdown since mid-February.
That's a long way from the swoons of 5% and 10%-plus that we got in 2010, and indeed the level of volatility the equity index option market is pricing for today. The CBOE S&P 500 Volatility Index (VIX), after several years at subdued levels, has priced for 20%-plus annualized U.S. equity volatility since its spike last March. That is consistent with the dips we saw in September and late October. Even accounting for the premium baked into option pricing, it implies that the market should anticipate similar 5 - 10% drawdowns still to come.
With that in mind, we think investors ought to consider how their portfolios are set to weather that potential volatility, but also how they might take advantage if and when it arrives.
When the primary cause of equity market volatility is rising rates, the traditional portfolio diversifiers, government bonds, are unlikely to offer protection. They are down some 3 - 6% so far this year, and more than 10% further out on the curve. The Merrill Lynch Option Volatility Estimate, sometimes called the VIX for bonds, spiked even higher than the VIX itself at the end of February.
Alternative diversifying assets might be those exposed to a recovery in growth and inflation, but reasonably priced because they have been neglected for so long, such as Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, and those less exposed to changes in rates, such as commodities. Credit is interesting, too: Brad Tank has explained why it has been spared much of the volatility in equity and government bonds.
Liquid alternative strategies that specifically seek out return sources uncorrelated with equity and bond markets also have a role to play. Some of these strategies address markets that currently offer attractive value, such as Insurance-Linked Strategies.
Taking advantage of potential volatility can also mean adopting a more tactical approach.
At the start of the year, we were concerned about the level of short-term consensus even though we ultimately agreed with broad consensus views over the 12-month horizon of 2021. Our solution to that dilemma was to implement relative value positions across portfolios that stood to benefit from early-cycle reflationary growth while cutting allocations that we considered to be most at risk from the consensus. Examples were being short fully valued and interest rate-sensitive U.S. large caps, but long U.S. small caps and Japanese equities.
During the volatility at the end of January and the end of February, we were able to make those exposures more directional - by maintaining the longs in U.S. small caps and Japan but cutting back the short in U.S. large caps, for example. We also took the opportunity to add to markets that are particularly exposed to early-cycle recovery with relatively attractive valuations, such as the U.K.'s FTSE 100 Index.
Should we experience further bouts of higher volatility, as we anticipate, we will continue to make these tactical adjustments. Should equity markets defy gravity and only experience modest 3 - 5% drawdowns for the rest of the year, we will be content to draw the potential income from the mismatch between implied and realized volatility by holding equity index option PutWrite strategies.
Recoveries are rarely straight lines, but a straight line was implied by the consensus at the beginning of the year. We share that fundamental optimism, but we also seek to diversify against short-term risks and believe it is prudent to lean portfolios into this new cycle as volatility creates better entry points through the year.
In Case You Missed It
- ISM Manufacturing Index: +2.1 to 60.8 in February
- Eurozone Consumer Price Index: +0.9% year-over-year in February
- ISM Non-Manufacturing Index: -3.4 to 55.3 in February
- Eurozone Purchasing Managers' Index: +1.0 to 48.8 in February
- U.S. Initial Jobless Claims: +745,000 for the week ending February 27
- U.S. Employment Report: Nonfarm payrolls increased 379,000 and the unemployment rate decreased to 6.2% in February
What to Watch For
- Monday, March 8:
- Japan 4Q 2020 GDP (Final)
- Tuesday, March 9:
- Eurozone 4Q 2020 GDP (Final)
- Wednesday, March 10:
- U.S. Consumer Price Index
- Thursday, March 11:
- Eurozone Central Bank Policy Decision
- U.S. Initial Jobless Claims
- Friday, March 12:
- U.S. Producer Price Index
This material is provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice. This material is general in nature and is not directed to any category of investors and should not be regarded as individualized, a recommendation, investment advice or a suggestion to engage in or refrain from any investment-related course of action. Investment decisions and the appropriateness of this material should be made based on an investor's individual objectives and circumstances and in consultation with his or her advisors. Information is obtained from sources deemed reliable, but there is no representation or warranty as to its accuracy, completeness or reliability. All information is current as of the date of this material and is subject to change without notice. The firm, its employees and advisory accounts may hold positions of any companies discussed. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Neuberger Berman products and services may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all client types. References to third-party sites are for informational purposes only and do not imply any endorsement, approval, investigation, verification or monitoring by Neuberger Berman of any content or information contained within or accessible from such sites.
Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments in hedge funds and private equity are speculative and involve a higher degree of risk than more traditional investments. Investments in hedge funds and private equity are intended for sophisticated investors only. Indexes are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The views expressed herein include those of the Neuberger Berman Multi-Asset Class (MAC) team and Neuberger Berman's Asset Allocation Committee. The Asset Allocation Committee is comprised of professionals across multiple disciplines, including equity and fixed income strategists and portfolio managers. The Asset Allocation Committee reviews and sets long-term asset allocation models, establishes preferred near-term tactical asset class allocations and, upon request, reviews asset allocations for large diversified mandates. Tactical asset allocation views are based on a hypothetical reference portfolio. The views of the MAC team or the Asset Allocation Committee may not reflect the views of the firm as a whole and Neuberger Berman advisers and portfolio managers may take contrary positions to the views of the MAC team or the Asset Allocation Committee. The MAC team and the Asset Allocation Committee views do not constitute a prediction or projection of future events or future market behavior. The duration and characteristics of past market/economic cycles and market behavior, including length and recovery time of past recessions and market downturns, is no indication of the duration and characteristics of any current or future market/economic cycles or behavior. This material may include estimates, outlooks, projections and other "forward-looking statements." Due to a variety of factors, actual events or market behavior may differ significantly from any views expressed.
This material is being issued on a limited basis through various global subsidiaries and affiliates of Neuberger Berman Group LLC. Please visit www.nb.com/disclosure-global-communications for the specific entities and jurisdictional limitations and restrictions.
The "Neuberger Berman" name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC.
Certain products and services may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all client types. The information provided herein is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information about our products and services and to otherwise provide general investment education. No information contained herein should be regarded as a suggestion to engage in or refrain from any investment-related course of action as Neuberger Berman Group LLC (and its affiliates, "Neuberger Berman") is not undertaking to provide impartial investment advice, act as an impartial adviser, or give advice in a fiduciary capacity with respect to the materials presented herein. If you are an individual retirement investor, contact your financial advisor or other non-Neuberger Berman fiduciary about whether any given investment idea, strategy, product or service described herein may be appropriate for your circumstances.
Neuberger Berman strives to provide individuals with disabilities equal access to our services, including through an accessible website. If you have questions, comments, or encounter any difficulty using our site, please call us at 212 476 9000.
© 2009-2021 Neuberger Berman Group LLC. All rights reserved.
Editor's Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.
This article was written by