Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Intel Mobileye Debuts World's First Commercial Autonomous Driving System

May 01, 2021 9:55 AM ETIntel Corporation (INTC)199 Comments
Arne Verheyde profile picture
Arne Verheyde
10.03K Followers

Summary

  • Intel’s Mobileye, arguably the global leader in autonomous driving and robotaxis, will enter the autonomous last-mile delivery market starting in 2023.
  • Intel also unveiled its Mobileye Drive self-driving system powering its AVs. This hence marks the industry’s first commercial autonomous driving solution.
  • While other players operate in small, unscalable, geofenced areas, Mobileye is achieving world domination in AVs.
  • As the only company to solve the geofence problem yet, this means Mobileye remains the only serious, viable investment in the upcoming multi-trillion-dollar autonomous driving revolution.

Ingang van de Intel-Museum in Silicon Valley.
Photo by JHVEPhoto/iStock Editorial via Getty Images

Investment Thesis

Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) Mobileye has recently further expanded the scope of its autonomous driving business, signing a deal for entering the autonomous last-mile delivery space in 2023.

In the last year or

This article was written by

Arne Verheyde profile picture
10.03K Followers
With an engineering background, looking for companies with expertise to be well-positioned for growth and leadership.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I am/we are long INTC. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (199)

d
Paraphrasing you: "Google will never scale hence doomed".

You realize you're talking about Google right? The first kings of scaling?
S
@dunnpfiff Google basically lost the autonomy race...it's pretty obvious, the Waymo CEO literally stepped down just recently.

Tesla / Mobileye probably takes the cake, they have demonstrated city self driving already, go on youtube and you will find many videos about this.
J
I like Mobileye in the segment, but I'm just going to have to remain skeptical on the segment until I see at least one L4/L5 system working in the real world. I've been driving Mobileye's ADAS (in Hondas) for about four years now, it's helpful, it's limited, it's glitchy, it's by far the leading ADAS system out there, but Mobileye doesn't earn much money from it, either.

And of course I'm curious whether there's any synergy within Intel between Mobileye, Habana, and a couple of their other AI divisions and acquisitions.
The Snowball Effect profile picture
@Just Some Guy When asked, Mobileye's Shashua likes to cite their next gen lidars as one example of synergy. He talks about how their Lidar will be based on Intel's photonics.
f
Mobile is at the top of food chain for autonomous driving, tsla has fake l2, they are using people to test their software
grxbstrd profile picture
Baidu, an early NVDA Drive customer, begins autonomous taxi service in Bejing. www.marketwatch.com/...
W
@grxbstrd thank you that was very interesting, working from slow up in small area does seem sensible, these high speed shots of Tesla personally I find very frightening to watch
z
@grxbstrd Baidu have basically did there own thing here with Apollo, It does not user any of the full Nvidia Drive stack at all keep up!!

Neousys Technology who work with Baidu on the compute interface actually use Intel CPU and an Nvidia GPU in a standard CPU/GPU master slave config.
grxbstrd profile picture
@zisdead "Baidu have basically did there own thing here with Apollo, It does not user any of the full Nvidia Drive stack at all"

Baidu has been an NVIDIA Drive customer for years -- that's ALL I said. You're doing that bull-shitty thing of putting words in my mouth just to argue against it. No where did I say Baidu was using an NVDA full stack solution. Very lame.

And GPUs actually get the top billing in the latest Neousys product description:

"Introduction
Nuvo-8108GC is a rugged GPU Computing edge AI platform with industrial-grade design and in-vehicle features. Designed specifically to support a high-end (RTX) 250W NVIDIA® graphics card, it offers tremendous GPU power up to 14 TFLOPS in FP32 for emerging GPU-accelerated edge computing, such as autonomous driving, vision inspection and surveillance/ security."

That should tell you something about where the all the heavy lifting is done, eg, not the CPU.
J
What happens when the autonomous vehicle arrives at the address? How does the package get to someplace that’s convenient to the customer…? Never mind the last mile… How does the last 20 yards work?
W
@JonathanMicocci it’s all very well if the customer rushes out , opens the lid, and retrieves the item otherwise as you say, there’s a problem, maybe we’ll move on from letterboxes to lockable bin storage, maybe even with climate control for perishables, and it would stop people stealing Amazon packages, no mention of Amazon in article though ?
J
@Will-G Right....considering all the different home types...not everyone is on a suburban street...they're spending a lot to replace the humans who do it quite well.
e
@JonathanMicocci
maybe, they will start using child labor. they won't need to learn to drive, and while they are riding around, they can play video games. they can pay them much lower wages as they will be contractors, and they are going to get paid for the actual minutes where they are delivering packages. all of the time riding in autonomous vehicle is considered fun, and not work.
karl.freund profile picture
To call this marketing an analysis does a disservice to your readers. Let’s see: UDelv vs Toyota, Audi, Mercedes, and many more who selected NVIDIA.
N
@karl.freund Nvidia doesn't sell a turnkey solution only the building blocks. You still have to develop the AD system for your car. Mobileye is a whole solution for.someone that doesn't feel that they need to own the system.
grxbstrd profile picture
@NicZ "Nvidia doesn't sell a turnkey solution only the building blocks. "

check again. They sell as much or a little as you need but the have an entire stack, including an out of the box "AD system" -- (what I assume you're referring to as) autonomous driving algorithms.

www.nvidia.com/...
e
Mobileye is at 30+ partners while Nvidia is at 270+.
C
I prefer to stick with Google with chance that Waymo will be able to compete with Mobileye. Prefer the main parts of Google compared to Intel.
i
So how will this affect intel's revenue in the future ? Just the mobileye segment is fine.
oldfeller profile picture
This article reads more like Intel propaganda than an objective evaluation. Reminds me of a recent president continually proclaiming, "I am the greatest!"
e
Author is well-known Intel apologist.
Henry98 profile picture
@oldfeller He was the greatest
Downtown10 profile picture
Opinions differ.

todaynewspost.com/...
C
@Downtown10 From your link:

Top 10 Vendors:
Waymo
Nvidia
Argo AI
Baidu
Contenders
Cruise
Motional
Mobileye
Aurora
Zoox
Raymond Caron profile picture
Noticed how often you use the word Mobileye?

Intel should spin this company off, it's a drag on the name and potential.
Sighcopath profile picture
I will believe in the future of self driving cars once the insurance companies sign off on self driving car policies. Until then they will remain driver assisted vechicles!
It's 6:09 profile picture
@Sighcopath much of this article appears to be focused less on full autonomous EV vehicles, rather on delivery robots that will use bike lanes and sidewalks to deliver packages/food to the last mile. There will be a different set of policies for these services, principally dictated by governments and municipalities. Insurance will have a voice, but not an outsized one.
productivityLeaps profile picture
@Sighcopath it looks likely that at least in some cases, the insurer will be the provider of the service; at least that is what is suggested Volvo will do and why not? Expect much greater levels of safety when machines are doing more of the driving vs. humans ...
Dividend Ambassador profile picture
Why is everyone so down on INTC. I just don’t get it.
c
@killiondt Because they are stuck in the past with ancient x86 technology, and acquisitions like Mobileye will do little or nothing for them!
T
@killiondt Intel's execution has been poor for many years. 10nm production took several years longer than planned, and new product releases have also been slow while AMD has overtaken them. Not too long ago, they were 1-2 years ahead on process technology, now they're at least 2 years behind TSMC. I suspect investors want to see them get back to executing at a competitive level again. If anyone can lead them to do it, it's Gelsinger, but that's not a given until they actually do it because it's a tall order.
amootpoint profile picture
@killiondt Its just there are other opportunities people feel. But this almost feels like a strong buy at this price.
S
Love what Mobileye is doing but damn, the market just does not care about anything Intel does...at least for now.
R
@Spike Capital
2023 2023 2023....there is a pattern here
Simont profile picture
@Spike Capital : Oh no, the market does care about things that matter. As far as Intel is concerned Mobileye matters only marginally. They have to catch up on process development with TSMC to stop the bleeding.
S
@Simont No, nobody truly knows what exactly the market cares about at different times. No one really understands what matters.

As of this year the market did not care about how AMD does at all, it's already May and AMD is literally down 11.5% YTD, and AMD is supposed to be eating Intel's lunch. Great Q1 earnings from AMD --> tanked.
j
Good for intel going forward.
edca99 profile picture
Intel is massive undervalue, mostly due to the perception that links Intel to its x86 PC market. If broken down into separate parts one might think it is currently ridiculously cheap and priced as no growth for the next few decades.

- data center, HPC
- AI, accelerators
- client computing - CPU, dGPU
- Mobileye
- 5G
- IoT
- foundry service

Imagine a future where everything is autonomous, trillions market opportunity for Mobileye, it could be come a few hundreds billions to trillions business in the next decade.

Not to mention the explosive growth of data and AI that will drive the growth of Xeon, Habana Labs, Ponte Vecchio, etc. in future. It's not impossible for Intel to become a trillion company in the next 10 years.
e
@edca99 They are not leading technologically in any of those fields. They are priced as a second or third tier player which is what they are at this point.
edca99 profile picture
@estchava In fact, Intel is leading in ALL of those fields, except in the process node that is lagging TSMC.
Jere Ylianunti profile picture
@edca99

Leading technologically in DC, CPU, foundry? Really? Where have you been during the last four years?

I mean, even in dGPU it's a stretch to say that, and dGPU is anyway just a tiny subsegment of a bigger segment. "Leading" in that subsegment won't do too much good, it's not like anyone buys dGPU's separately.
ULS profile picture
@author thank you for a useful update on MBLY’s leadership position in the field of ADAS. You gave some details on their large-scale mapping leadership approach (REM) but you hardly mentioned RSS, a concept even more essential for L4 and L5 eventually winning approval by regulatory agencies throughout the world.

It seems to me, to gain an understanding of ADAS, every pundit here ought to listen to Mobileye’s CEO – who is also their CTO! – Professor Amnon Shashua explain Mobileye’s leading solutions in some of his presentations and conversations. Here with Thomas Friedman of the NY Times CES+2021_+Thomas+Friedman+and+Prof+Amnon+Shashua+on+Artificial+Intelligence on Vimeo
And here some deliberations on their discussion in EE Times @author thank you for a useful update on MBLY’s leadership position in the field of ADAS. You gave some details on their large-scale mapping leadership approach (REM) but you hardly mentioned RSS, a concept even more essential for L4 and L5 eventually winning approval by regulatory agencies throughout the world.

It seems to me, to gain an understanding of ADAS, all the pundits here ought to listen to Mobileye’s CEO – who is also their CTO! – Professor Amnon Shashua explain Mobileye’s leading solutions in some of his presentations and conversations. Here with Thomas Friedman of the NY Times www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDiivbomPHA
And here some deliberations on their discussion in EE Times: Shashua-Friedman Chat: AI Is Both ‘Miraculous’ and ‘Dangerous’ | EE Times OR www.eetimes.com/shashua-friedman-chat-ai-is-both-miraculous-and-dangerous/
The way I see it, work at Mobileye is advancing the forefront of AI at Intel; very much a part of Intel’s key and central business in the 21st century.

Permit me a remark also on the “quality” of most comments to articles that go a bit beyond the horizon of pundits: they are generally not worth the electronic ink they cost. Hardly any one of bothered to deal with the thesis of your article: Mobileye is far ahead of everybody else, who merely “dabbles” in ADAS.
Shashua-Friedman Chat: AI Is Both ‘Miraculous’ and ‘Dangerous’ | EE Times

The way I see it, work at Mobileye is advancing the forefront of AI at Intel; very much a part of Intel’s key and central business in the 21st century.

Permit me a remark also on the “quality” of most comments to articles that go a bit beyond the horizon of pundits: they are generally not worth the electronic ink they cost. Hardly any one of bothered to deal with the thesis of your article: Mobileye is far ahead of everybody else, who merely “dabbles” in ADAS.
ULS profile picture
I apologize for inserting some of my text twice
W
@ULS there’s an edit button, but I switch my left mobile eye onto fast scan.
Do you see MBLYs sticking with intel or trying ARM ?
I think Apple could make the most intelligent eyes, I thought for a moment they were going to partner with Hyundai and Boston robotics, but alas it was not to be, and Toyota too have kept very quiet in this field, Baidu have actually got fare paying robotaxi in many cities, perhaps China has the lead, and the “spying Tesla’s” was just a ploy to better understand the IP.
e
MobilEye picture is not as rosy as it's cracked up to be. Great reading here guys:

www.eetimes.com/...

"Intel currently finds itself fighting battles on all fronts. With Nvidia and AMD (and Xilinx) in datacenter and compute. With TSMC and Samsung in manufacturing. It has lost Apple as a CPU customer. Pat Gelsinger starts as CEO on Monday (Feb. 15), Intel’s third in four years.

Long gone is the euphoria of the 2017 Mobileye acquisition. Mobileye’s lead in ADAS is now under attack, particularly from Qualcomm and Xilinx. It has no coherent roadmap for driver monitoring leading into occupant monitoring and no offering whatsoever to compete with Qualcomm and Nvidia in digital cockpit and in-vehicle infotainment (IVI).

Mobileye offers only the promise of longer-term success in autonomous driving, where further down the road I expect it to crash into the achievements of the very quiet, very focused and very capable Ford- and VW-backed Argo AI. Argo doesn’t say much, so when it does, I pay close attention to its accomplishments.

Meanwhile Mobileye continues to make promises and drain resources from Intel, all for less than a billion dollars of revenue in 2020, equating to just a little over 1 percent of total revenues of nearly $78 billion. Am I the only person who thinks Intel has a Mobileye problem?

Gelsinger has bigger issues to address than Mobileye, which is looking ever more like a cash-intensive vanity project Intel can subsidize no longer. Gelsinger didn’t buy Mobileye and neither did the guy before him. That honor goes to the guy before the guy before him, Brian Krzanich.

Mobileye suddenly looks vulnerable. With competitors circling to pick-off its ADAS business, no coherent DMS/OMS/CPD strategy and a need for further capital to realize its autonomous driving ambitions, Mobileye being sold-off or spun-out might just turn out to be the wildcard event of 2021. But I have no idea how this turns out, because nobody owns the future. Right?"
C
@estchava Mobileye is an independent subsidiary.
z
@estchava "AMD (and Xilinx) in datacenter"

AMD doesn't even own Xilinx and if it does close it will pay double what intel paid for Altera and Intel has had a 4 year integration head start.

Intel has nothing to fear from AMD , never had , never will.

TSMC different story but I trust Pat to turn that quick smart on the process side
C185 profile picture
@estchava
That article is discussing DMS - Driver Monitoring Systems. It's not relevant to the subject of this article, which is an L4. There's no point in monitoring a driver that doesn't exist.

This article expands on that article and references it. Apparently that author is known as both a DMS evangelist, and a Qualcomm cheerleader.
tr2w.com/...
s
I believe Mobileye had and still has the best AV technology but they need to act fast. Other are catching up. Only yesterday VW (mobileye client as of now) announced they will start working on their own AV solution. Several others like GM Cruise and Chinese are catching up.

Waymo will NOT win this race coz Lidar only solution will not work, has lots of corner cases and is EXPENSIVE. I believe INTC overpaid for Mobileye. THey paid $15bn for a company which does not even have 1bn in revenue and robotaxis etc are planned by 2024/25. I hope they deliever.
oldfeller profile picture
@stok_analyzer I suspect Waymo stuck with LiDAR because it worked the best. Several companies (Aeva, Luminar Technologies, MicroVision, AEye, and Ouster) are improving and integrating LiDAR to significantly lower its cost. Those incorporating AI (cleverly pronounced AEye) may do better at picking out their own echoes from the cacaphony from all the other LiDAR-deploying vehicles.
C185 profile picture
@stok_analyzer Mobileye is far ahead in advanced systems and GM Super Cruise uses Mobileye and will be in 22 GM vehicles by 2023.
www.msn.com/...

Below is a good interview with the Mobileye CEO. Consolidation as vehicles move to L3 and above seems inevitable.
m.futurecar.com/...
If TSLA were we working on L5 driving, the share price would be beyond the moon. Intel are working on it and the market shrugs. I am adding to INTC in case this works. Maybe one day people will look for driverless cars that say Intel Inside.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.