kynny/iStock via Getty Images
Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:TXN) is among the high quality and long-term-oriented companies in the semiconductors space, that also have sustainable competitive advantages on its back. However, this is not what is currently rewarded with a high valuation multiple in the space. Instead, high short-term sales growth is all that matters for some semiconductor companies.
While investing in the latter results in a strong momentum trade and exceptionally high short-term returns, valuations of such companies are subject to stronger reversals on the downside than the industry average. That is why Texas Instruments' steady value accumulation is to be preferred over the long run given the company's strong competitive advantages.
The semiconductors industry has become the linchpin of today's digital economy. Datacenters, mobile devices, automobiles, cryptocurrency mining, and telecommunication equipment are all thirsty for an ever-growing amount of silicone. Naturally, this has led to an industry that is favoring short-term sales growth numbers, over long-term strategy and high-quality business models.
This could easily be illustrated by the cross-sectional relationship between expected revenue growth rate and forward Price-to-Earnings multiples within the sector.
Source: prepared by the author, using data from Seeking Alpha
While the r-squared between those two variables is high, it falls down to 0.05 once we remove NVDA and AMD. As a matter of fact, if we substitute the P/E multiple with P/S and run the regression on both revenue growth and gross margin figures an interesting pattern emerges.
When using all the companies within the set on a revenue growth basis, the relationship is relatively strong with r-squared of 0.35. However, once we exclude AMD and NVDA, it falls down to 0.03. Doing the same analysis, but on a gross margin basis, yields exactly the opposite results.
Source: author's calculations
In other words, when analyzing all major semiconductor companies, profitability does a relatively good job at explaining valuation differences. But once we add NVDA and AMD to the sample, profitability loses its relevance in favor of expected growth. This clearly shows, how different certain segments of the semiconductors industry are and especially the exciting field of graphic processing units.
Given the fact that profitability is still relevant for the large part of the semiconductors industry, TXN appears as one of the best choices out there due to its highly profitable business model - both on gross and operating margin basis.
Source: prepared by the author, using data from Seeking Alpha
There are a number of key differentiating factors for TXN that set the company apart from its other peers in the semiconductors space. First of all, TXN is the leader in the analog integrated circuits space (see below).
Source: prepared by the author, using data from IC insights
The field is not as exciting as that of GPUs, however, analog ICs are integral for almost any electronic device that needs to interact with the environment. That is why TXN revenue streams are very diverse and span across many different markets.
Source: TXN Investor overview white paper
This in combination with TXN's relatively larger size and global reach, allows for economies of scale, cross-selling opportunities and last but not least - long-lasting relationships with customers.
Source: Texas Instruments Annual Report 2020
Texas Instruments strategy also differs in one key aspect - most of its production facilities are based in the United States, while sales are predominantly overseas.
Source: prepared by the author, using data from TXN Annual Report
This creates a very different dynamic to most other semiconductor peers that have gone fabless and rely heavily on overseas production partners for their domestic sales.
Instead of maximizing short-term profitability by becoming a fabless chipmaker, TXN's strategy is based around long-term sustainability of production and margins.
Source: Texas Instruments
To begin with, analog integrated circuits enjoy a much longer useful life when compared to digital ones and as such allow for a more long-term-oriented strategy. This in turn creates incentives for more production being done in-house, as opposed to relying on foundries based in Asia, and with that less supply chain-related risks.
And just to highlight something for maybe new listeners. Dave mentioned the foundries, only about 20% of our wafers are -- come from foundries. The vast majority, 80% and growing, we've had investments in 300-millimeter are internal wafers, and that just gives us much better control of our destiny.
Source: TXN Q3 2021 Earnings Transcript
While being a capital intensive business has fallen out of favor in recent years, there are signs that deglobalization trends are associated with significant risks for companies that rely less on in-house production.
In the meantime, even though TXN's strategy has been at odds with the short-term focus of recent years, the company has continued to reinvest into the business, while also rewarding shareholders.
Source: Texas Instruments
Moreover, as the company's share price has become increasingly expensive over the recent years, TXN's management has dialed down its share repurchase program in favor of dividend payments. That is why the ratio of dividend payments to share repurchases trails the company's Price-to-Book multiple.
Source: prepared by the author, using data from TXN SEC Filings
As market valuations reached peak levels in 2021, TXN management has reduced its share repurchase program to only $400m in the past 12-month period.
Source: prepared by the author, using data from TXN SEC Filings
Contrary to most of its peers, TXN management targets are based around the key valuation metric - the dollar amount of free cash flow per share.
We believe that growth of free cash flow per share is the primary driver of long-term value.
Source: Texas Instruments
The strategy seems to be working as TXN free cash flow per share has been growing steadily since 2003 at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14%.
Source: prepared by the author, using data from TXN SEC Filings
At the same time, using a cost of equity of 7.7% (based on 2.5% risk-free rate, 5.5% equity risk premium and 0.94 beta) and the company's free cash flow per share over the past 12-month period of $7.60, we arrive at a mere 3.5% required growth rate in perpetuity to justify the current share price.
The company's revenue growth rate estimates also appear very conservative at the moment. The consensus estimate for fiscal year 2022 stands at 4.3% as of today.
Source: Seeking Alpha
However, over the long run, the company's revenue growth rates exhibit a strong relationship with the previous year growth (t-1) in shipments of silicon materials (the former is plotted on the y-axis below and the latter on the x-axis).
Source: prepared by the author, using data from TXN SEC Filings and semi.org
Based on that relationship and shipments growth of 14% so far this year, it will be reasonable to expect TXN revenue growth of around 7% in fiscal year 2022.
Taking into account margins, TXN does not appear significantly overvalued on a historical basis.
Source: prepared by the author, using data from TXN SEC Filings and Yahoo! Finance
In addition to the high growth rate and more sustainable in-house operations, TXN's migration to 300-mm wafers provides a further tailwind for margins.
Source: TXN Capital Management Presentation
This will also be the case for the company's Richardson wafer fabrication facility expansion and the recent acquisition of Micron Technology's (MU) fab in Lehi, Utah.
Texas Instruments' profitable business model is based on a number of sustainable competitive advantages. At the same time, management has a long-term-oriented approach and has adapted the company's strategy to achieving long-term results as opposed to maximizing short-term profits. Low reliance on foundries on the other hand, makes TXN's high margins less susceptible to supply chain-related risks. Last but not least, the company's valuation appears conservative relative to fundamentals which creates a significant margin of safety in the highly cyclical industry of semiconductors.
This article was written by
Vladimir Dimitrov is a former strategy consultant with a professional focus on business and intangible assets valuation. His professional background lies in solving complex business problems through the lens of overall business strategy and various valuation and financial modelling techniques.
Vladimir has also been exploring the concept of value investing and in particular finding companies with sustainable competitive advantages that also trade below their intrinsic value. He supplements his bottom-up approach with a more holistic view of the markets through factor investing techniques.
Vladimir made his first investment in farmland right out of high school in 2007 and consequently started investing through mutual funds at the bottom of the market in 2009. In the years that followed he has been focused on developing his own investment philosophy and has been managing a concentrated equity portfolio since 2016. Vladimir is LSE Alumni and a CFA charterholder .
All of Vladimir's content published on Seeking Alpha is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Always consult a licensed investment professional before making investment decisions.
Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: Please do your own due diligence and consult with your financial advisor, if you have one, before making any investment decisions. The author is not acting in an investment adviser capacity. The author's opinions expressed herein address only select aspects of potential investment in securities of the companies mentioned and cannot be a substitute for comprehensive investment analysis. The author recommends that potential and existing investors conduct thorough investment research of their own, including detailed review of the companies' SEC filings. Any opinions or estimates constitute the author's best judgment as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice.