Last Orders For 2021 CEF Opportunities

Dec. 24, 2021 12:24 PM ETAIF, ARDC, BGH, CXH, OCCI, PTA, PTY4 Comments


  • With most of tax-loss selling behind us, a small correction in discounts and the January effect ahead of us, it makes sense to consider a few CEF ideas.
  • We take a look at funds that offer a decent track record as well as an attractive entry point in valuation terms.
  • We highlight funds such as BGH, ARDC, AIF and others.
  • I do much more than just articles at Systematic Income: Members get access to model portfolios, regular updates, a chat room, and more. Learn More »

Digitally enhanced shot of a graph showing the ups and downs shares on the stock market

shapecharge/iStock via Getty Images

This article was first released to Systematic Income subscribers and free trials on Dec. 18.

In this article, we take a look at a number of CEF ideas we like in the market right now. In our view, it's worth considering marginal allocations currently for three reasons. First, the majority of tax-loss selling pressure should be behind us, judging by the performance of the likely tax-loss selling candidates over the last few days such as the PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) or the OFS Credit Co. (OCCI) despite a fairly tepid overall market.

Secondly, discounts have come off the boil somewhat, particularly in credit CEFs, although they remain relatively expensive over the last decade.

Source: Systematic Income

Thirdly, the CEF market has a clear January effect as the following chart suggests with discounts tending to rally out of the gate.

Source: Systematic Income

Our starting point for highlighting opportunities is the following chart which provides a valuation and quality screen for the broader CEF market.

Source: Systematic Income

The valuation screen is composed of two metrics:

  • Discount - this is the familiar CEF metric, which is capped at 5% in the chart, i.e., only showing funds with discounts above/wider of 5%
  • Discount Sector Spread Percentile - this is a relative valuation metric which measures the fund's valuation relative to its historic relationship to the sector. A figure of zero means the fund is trading at the widest discount differential relative to the sector (i.e., is cheapest relative to its sector) and vice-versa in the last 5 years

The quality screen relates to a number of other metrics such as historic NAV performance, risk and yield metrics and others. The screen selects only the top-scoring funds in each sector. The idea here is to filter out funds that are value traps, i.e., those that trade at attractive valuations but do so for a reason as they are relatively poor stewards of investor capital.

Funds that we would highlight in this selection are the following in the order of riskier holdings to less risky holdings.

The Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) trades at a 7.57% current yield and a 6.3% discount with coverage of around 126%. The fund features one of the lower quality allocations in the CEF space with a 40% allocation to credits rated CCC and below as well as a fairly cyclical tilt with a quarter of the portfolio in energy and mining below.

Source: Barings

This one is very much for investors who are either constructive on the macro picture in the medium term or prefer a barbell allocation that combines higher-quality with lower-quality allocations. The fund features a duration of 2.2 which is an attractive feature given the asymmetric risk to interest rates.

The fund has been a strong performer in the limited duration sector.

Source: Systematic Income CEF Tool

And looks attractive on valuation grounds relative to the broader sector.

Source: Systematic Income CEF Tool

The Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund (ARDC) allocates to high-yield corporate bonds, loans, CLO debt and CLO equity in order of allocation percentage. The fund trades at a 6.8% discount and a 7.61% current yield with coverage at around 99%.

Source: Ares

The fund has delivered sector-beating performance over various time horizons in NAV terms, though some of this is due to the fact that it also holds HY corporate bonds which have historically outperformed loans.

Source: Systematic Income CEF Tool

We also like the fund due to its allocation to CLO debt, particularly BB-rated tranches which continue to trade at attractive yields.

Source: KKR

The Apollo Tactical Income Fund (AIF) trades at a 7.3% discount and a 7.05% current yield with coverage of 91%.

Source: Apollo

The fund has beaten the sector over 3 and 5 years though it has lagged over the past year.

Source: Systematic Income CEF Tool

The fund's discount has recently widened more than the broader sector which makes it look attractive once again.

Source: Systematic Income CEF Tool

The MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (CXH) allocates to primarily investment-grade tax-exempt bonds. The fund is overweight health facilities and hospitals with a 32% portfolio weight and features duration of about 9. CXH trades at a 7.7% discount and a 3.99% current yield. The fund has made a few trims to its distribution which is something MFS likes to do with their funds. Current coverage is about 106%.

The fund has roughly matched the sector's performance over the last 5 years in total NAV terms though it has lagged more recently, likely owing to its higher-quality allocation relative to the sector.

Source: Systematic Income CEF Tool

CXH has tended to trade at a wider discount relative to the sector and this differential has widened recently - likely a result of its distribution trims.

Source: Systematic Income CEF Tool

It's worth stressing, however, that the fund's covered yield (i.e., net investment income, i.e., NII yield on price) is nearly the same as the broader sector at 4.23%. In other words, investors earn the same net investment income on the fund's portfolio but do so at a wider discount and, hence, a greater margin of safety.

A few attractive funds were left out from our screen due to the fact that they don't have a sufficiently long track record to get a quality score. However, they are still worth a look in our view.

The Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities & Income Fund (PTA) is a relatively new fund which has gotten itself into a negative tax-loss selling feedback loop and has underperformed the other two Cohen & Steers preferreds funds in price terms. However, if we look at the total NAV profile this year, it is actually slightly ahead of the other two funds this year.

Source: Systematic Income

PTA, like most other preferreds CEFs, allocates primarily to investment-grade rated financial issuers (by senior unsecured rating). The rating profile of its preferreds holdings is about 60% in investment-grade and highest-rated high-yield rating (i.e., BB+).

Source: Cohen & Steers

The fund trades at a 5.6% discount and a 6.51% current yield. The fund's discounts are well wider of the other two funds. In our view, this should converge somewhat over time since the fund, in effect, offers a very similar allocation. PTA does have a somewhat higher management fee, so we don't expect the discount to fully converge with the other two funds.

Source: Systematic Income CEF Tool

Finally, for fans of CLO Equity or more tactically-oriented investors, we currently like the OFS Credit Co. (OCCI) which is trading at a steep discount relative to the other two CLO Equity CEFs.

Source: Systematic Income

This chart shows the discount differential between OCCI and the average of the other two sector funds.

Source: Systematic Income

In our view, OCCI is not attractive as a longer-term core holding because its long-term total NAV performance is unimpressive. However, its current valuation is also unusually cheap versus the sector.

Source: Systematic Income CEF Tool


With the majority of tax-loss selling behind us and the January effect ahead of us, it looks like a decent time to consider either adding a marginal amount of risk (perhaps from accumulated distributions) or reshuffling the portfolio into attractively-priced funds with strong track records. More broadly, CEF valuations remain relatively expensive so investors should consider maintaining some amount of dry powder that is likely to be put to use as the Fed begins its likely lift-off in the middle of next year.

Check out Systematic Income and explore our Income Portfolios, engineered with both yield and risk management considerations.

Use our powerful Interactive Investor Tools to navigate the BDC, CEF, OEF, preferred and baby bond markets.

Read our Investor Guides: to CEFs, Preferreds and PIMCO CEFs.

Check us out on a no-risk basis - sign up for a 2-week free trial!

This article was written by

ADS Analytics profile picture
Income investing across BDCs, CEFs, ETFs, preferreds, baby bonds and more.

At Systematic Income our aim is to build robust Income Portfolios with mid-to-high single digit yields and provide investors with unique Interactive Tools to cut through the wealth of different investment options across BDCs, CEFs, ETFs, mutual funds, preferred stocks and more. Join us on our Marketplace service Systematic Income.

Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of AIF, ARDC either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Recommended For You

Comments (4)

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.