The disinflationary impact of Fed policy on equities is coming. There is currently much debate in the mainstream media suggesting investors should ignore Fed rate hikes. To wit:
History suggests U.S. stocks are poised to experience more volatility following the rise in rates. But that doesn’t mean the bull run is over. In fact, in the previous eight hiking cycles the S&P 500 was higher a year after the first increase every single time, according to LPL Financial.” – Bloomberg
Such is a pretty compelling argument on the surface to stay the course with portfolios. However, as is always the case, every market cycle is different. Let’s look at a chart of Fed rate hiking cycles from 1980 to the present.
Historically, Fed rate hikes have consistently led to poor outcomes for investors. However, since the Fed policy takes about 9 months to impact the economy, LPL’s chart doesn’t show you “what happened next.”
Furthermore, out of the last 8 rate hike cycles, 80% of them occurred during the secular bull market cycle that started in 1980. During that 20-year cycle, the deregulation of the financial industry led to a massive debt-driven consumption boom, combined with consistently falling inflation and interest rates.
Even with those tailwinds, the Fed managed to create crisis after crisis by hiking rates.
Here is another problem for the “don’t fear Fed rate hikes” thesis.
For the last decade, the primary bullish thesis for chasing equity markets remains “Don’t fight the Fed.” While the “bulls” are adamant that you shouldn’t “fight the Fed” when monetary policy is loose, as evidenced by LPL, they say the same when it reverses.
However, logic would dictate that outcomes cannot be different unless the changes to monetary policy have no impact on equity pricing. That was a point previously made by Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari once stated that the Fed’s QE program does not affect the financial markets.
“QE conspiracists can say this is all about balance sheet growth. Someone explain how swapping one short-term risk-free instrument (reserves) for another short-term risk-free instrument (t-bills) leads to equity repricing. I don’t see it.”
While he may be “technically correct,” as noted, there is ample evidence of a direct impact on financial markets. As discussed in “Past Performance Is A Guarantee:”
“Given the high correlation between the financial markets and the Federal Reserve interventions, there is credence to Minsky’s theory. With an R-Square of nearly 85%, the Fed is impacting financial markets.”
The inflation of assets was not isolated in the U.S. but globally.
“If you run a simple regression since June 2009, the starting point of the biggest monetary experiment ever, you will find that the G4 Central Banks balance sheet explains 90%(!) of the MSCI AC World Index level.” – @TheMarketEar
Given the high correlation to asset prices, logic suggests any contraction of the Fed’s balance sheet is disinflationary.
That contraction is coming, and if correlations hold, the disinflationary impact on equity assets should logically follow.
As noted, monetary policy has a lag effect of about 9 months before it becomes evident in the markets and economy. As shown, with market sentiment so extremely negative, a market rally is certainly possible.
However, as my colleague Albert Edwards recently noted:
“Surely all of us working in finance realize by now that something is likely to snap in the financial system and probably quite soon. The rapidity of current market moves and the polarisation of the now extreme Fed (hawkish) and BoJ (dovish) policies almost guarantees that outcome.”
Notably, while discussing the disinflationary impact on equities (lower returns), such does not necessarily mean a “bear market.” There is certainly a possibility the U.S. could avoid a major bear market as long as global inflows continue at the current unprecedented pace.
Unfortunately, history suggests that such an optimistic outcome is rarely the case, given higher rates, less monetary accommodation, and slower economic growth.
While many believe the Fed will hike rates in their quest to battle inflation, that fight will end quickly when “financial instability” arises. As Former Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher noted:
“Let’s face it, Joe…the market has worn beer goggles for the longest possible time. They just believe the Fed’s going to bail them out.
I think the strike price on the Fed put has moved significantly [lower]. Unless we have a dramatic turn in the markets, it can infect the real economy.”
How would such a dramatic turn occur?
I suspect, as noted above that somewhere between a 20-30% decline, we will see the Fed return its focus to “market stability.”
Selling rallies certainly seems to be the prudent course of action at this stage of the equity cycle.
Editor's Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.
This article was written by
After having been in the investing world for more than 25 years from private banking and investment management to private and venture capital; I have pretty much "been there and done that" at one point or another. I am currently a partner at RIA Advisors in Houston, Texas.
The majority of my time is spent analyzing, researching and writing commentary about investing, investor psychology and macro-views of the markets and the economy. My thoughts are not generally mainstream and are often contrarian in nature but I try an use a common sense approach, clear explanations and my “real world” experience in the process.
I am a managing partner of RIA Pro, a weekly subscriber based-newsletter that is distributed to individual and professional investors nationwide. The newsletter covers economic, political and market topics as they relate to your money and life.
I also write a daily blog which is read by thousands nationwide from individuals to professionals at www.realinvestmentadvice.com.