tiero/iStock via Getty Images
It's always and forever a market of stocks, not a stock market, and that applies to even some of the world's greatest companies.
Take 3M (NYSE:MMM), the legendary dividend king, which has been raising its dividend for 64 consecutive years.
3M is down 42% off its highs, but that's part of a 50% decline that began in a multi-year bear market.
How on earth can I be interested in a company with a chart this ugly?
Because 3M's current bear market was the result of a bubble.
3M's cycles are very long and it can spend years overvalued and many years undervalued.
Today, 3M trades at the best valuation in 11 years, lower than the March 2020 Pandemic lows.
But wait a second, haven't I been warning readers for several weeks that this bear market might not end until stocks fall a lot further?
Time Frame | Historically Average Bear Market Bottom |
Non-Recessionary Bear Markets Since 1965 | -21% (Achieved May 20th) |
Median Recessionary Bear Market Since WWII | -24% (Citigroup base case with a mild recession) June 16th |
Non-Recessionary Bear Markets Since 1928 | -26% (Goldman Sachs base case with a mild recession) |
Average Bear Markets Since WWII | -30% (Morgan Stanley base case) |
Recessionary Bear Markets Since 1965 | -36% (Bank of America recessionary base case) |
All 140 Bear Markets Since 1792 | -37% |
Average Recessionary Bear Market Since 1928 | -40% (Deutsche Bank, Bridgewater, SocGen Severe Recessionary base case, Morgan Stanley Recessionary Base Case) |
(Sources: Ben Carlson, Bank of America, Oxford Economics, Goldman Sachs) |
Indeed it might, depending on whether or not we get a recession in 2023.
However, I need to point out three important facts. First, individual companies bottom at different times. For example:
Second, stocks don't bottom because bad news stops coming. They bottom when the market has priced in all the bad news that's likely coming.
Finally, for those who are worried about buying any company in a bear market lest it fall further, consider this.
Discount To Fair Value/Further Decline | Additional Long-Term Upside | Annualized Additional Return (30 Years) |
5% | 5.30% | 0.17% |
10% | 11.10% | 0.35% |
15% | 17.60% | 0.54% |
20% | 25% | 0.75% |
25% (Potential Further Decline In S&P) | 33.3% | 0.96% |
30% | 42.90% | 1.20% |
35% | 53.80% | 1.45% |
38% (3M's Discount) | 61.3% | 1.60% |
40% | 66.70% | 1.72% |
45% | 81.80% | 2.01% |
50% | 100% | 2.34% |
55% | 122.2% | 2.70% |
60% | 150% | 3.10% |
(Source: MoneyChimp)
In the event of a recession, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Soc Gen, Bridgewater, and Bank of America think the S&P could fall as much as 25% more.
If that happens then anyone who nails the exact bottom would benefit from an additional 33% total returns in the future, or 1% higher annual returns.
But 3M is already 38% historically undervalued, a potential Ultra Value Buffett-style "fat pitch" that means buying today results in a 61% total return simply from long-term valuation mean reversion.
And guess what? Valuation mean reversion is one of the strongest forces in finance.
According to a study from Bank of America, valuation mean reversion explains 80% of blue-chip returns since 1987.
Or to put it another way, if a company's fundamentals, such as long-term growth, remain similar over time, then valuation returning to historical levels can deliver truly exceptional returns for deep value investors.
Rule number one: most things will prove to be cyclical.
Rule number two: some of the greatest opportunities for gain and loss come when other people forget rule number one.” - Howard Marks
What does this mean for high-yield investors considering buying 3M today?
It means the ability to lock in one of the best yields on MMM in history.
In the last 25 years, 3M's peak yield was 4.99%, back in the Great Recession when the economy was collapsing.
In the last quarter-century MMM's yield was only higher than 3.5% 6.6% of the time and today it's 4.6%. What does that potential mean?
Wait for a fat pitch and then swing for the fences." - Warren Buffett
That 3M is one of the best Buffett-style "fat pitches" you can buy from an A-rated dividend king.
So let me show you the five reasons I just recommended 3M for Dividend Kings members, and why it's the best time in 11 years to consider adding some of this legendary dividend growth blue-chip to your portfolio.
3M Has Considerable Near-Term Challenges, but Long-Term Discount Persists
Litigation fears are an overhang on 3M's stock, which we believe is responsible for the persistent price-to-value gap. Still, we think the market somewhat fails to appreciate 3M's short-cycle nature that benefits during the early stage of a recovery. Furthermore, we think litigation fears are overblown." - Morningstar
PFAS liabilities are not likely to break MMM's safe dividend thesis.
Terrifying jury awards might get the headlines but they almost never actually happen.
The bigger the award the more likely it is to be reversed or slashed by 50% to 99.9% on appears.
Two U.S. Army veterans in late January were each awarded $15 million in compensatory and $40 million in punitive damages, ballooning the sum of damages awarded so far to more than $160 million, according to lawyers for the plaintiffs...
JPMorgan’s Tusa this month increased what he called a conservative estimate of 3M’s liabilities to a range of $2 billion to $185 billion, reflecting how thousands more claims are being moved to the court’s active docket for possible trial preparation." - Bloomberg
Worst-case PFAS liabilities are $20 billion according to Bloomberg.
The intelligent investor is a realist who buys from pessimists and sells to optimists." - Ben Graham, The Intelligent Investor
That's a very wide range of potential legal liabilities but remember that the actual amount is likely to be on the lower end AND 3M is likely to pay it over 30 years.
As for 3M's combat arms litigation, we earmark a liability of just over $3 billion based on inflation-adjusted comparable cases and the number of cases pending." - Morningstar
Morningstar's $3 billion in estimated final legal liabilities over 15 to 30 years is $100 million to $200 million per year.
Here is the bottom line upfront on 3M.
Metric | 2021 Growth Consensus | 2022 Growth Consensus | 2023 Growth Consensus | 2024 Growth Consensus | 2025 Growth Consensus |
Sales | 9% | 2% | 4% | 3% | 7% |
Dividend | 1% | 1% | 4% | 2% (66-Year Growth Streak) | NA |
EPS | 16% | 7% | 5% | 3% | 11% |
Operating Cash Flow | -9% | 0% | 10% | 5% | NA |
Free Cash Flow | -12% | -5% | 14% | 9% | 11% |
EBITDA | 6% | 4% | 5% | 4% | NA |
EBIT (operating income) | 8% | 6% | 6% | 2% | NA |
(Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet)
Analysts aren't yet pricing in a recession but the decline in 2023 if it happens, should be on the order of -5% to -10%.
(Source: Portfolio Visualizer Premium)
MMM is a consistently modest market beater over the last 37 years but from bear market lows it's capable of returns as strong as 16% for the next 15 years and 19% for the next 10 years.
At 14.6% long-term return potential, 3M is trading at some of the most attractive valuations in its history.
(Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet) (Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet)
If MMM grows as analysts expect by 2024 and returns to historical mid-range fair value it could deliver 88% total returns or 29% annually.
(Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet)
(Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet)
By 2027, if MMM grows as expected and returns to historical mid-range fair value, it could deliver 161% total returns or 19% annually.
Investment Strategy | Yield | LT Consensus Growth | LT Consensus Total Return Potential | Long-Term Risk-Adjusted Expected Return | Long-Term Inflation And Risk-Adjusted Expected Returns | Years To Double Your Inflation & Risk-Adjusted Wealth | 10-Year Inflation And Risk-Adjusted Expected Return |
3M | 4.4% | 8.0% | 12.4% | 8.7% | 6.2% | 11.6 | 1.83 |
High-Yield | 3.1% | 12.7% | 15.8% | 11.1% | 8.6% | 8.4 | 2.28 |
Dividend Aristocrats | 2.4% | 8.5% | 10.9% | 7.6% | 5.2% | 14.0 | 1.65 |
S&P 500 | 1.8% | 8.5% | 10.3% | 7.2% | 4.7% | 15.2 | 1.59 |
(Sources: Morningstar, FactSet, Ycharts)
(Source: Portfolio Visualizer Premium)
(Source: Portfolio Visualizer Premium)
MMM was beating the market over 37 years before its recent 50% bear market.
occasional special dividends explain the spikes in income ((Source: Portfolio Visualizer Premium))
Portfolio | 1986 Income Per $1,000 Investment | 2022 Income Per $1,000 Investment | Annual Income Growth | Starting Yield | 2022 Yield On Cost |
3M | $46 | $1,680 | 10.51% | 4.6% | 168.0% |
(Source: Portfolio Visualizer Premium)
MMM's yield in 1986 was 4.6%, similar to today, and it delivered 10.5% annual income growth over 36 years.
What about the future?
Analyst Consensus Income Growth Forecast | Risk-Adjusted Expected Income Growth | Risk And Tax-Adjusted Expected Income Growth | Risk, Inflation, And Tax Adjusted Income Growth Consensus |
12.7% | 8.9% | 7.5% | 5.0% |
(Source: DK Research Terminal, FactSet)
Analysts expect 13% income growth from MMM in the future, which adjusted for the risk of it not growing as expected, inflation, and taxes is about 5.0% real expected income growth.
Now compare that to what they expect from the S&P 500.
Time Frame | S&P Inflation-Adjusted Dividend Growth | S&P Inflation-Adjusted Earnings Growth |
1871-2021 | 1.6% | 2.1% |
1945-2021 | 2.4% | 3.5% |
1981-2021 (Modern Falling Rate Era) | 2.8% | 3.8% |
2008-2021 (Modern Low Rate Era) | 3.5% | 6.2% |
FactSet Future Consensus | 2.0% | 5.2% |
(Sources: S&P, FactSet, Multipl.com)
What about a 60/40 retirement portfolio?
In other words, MMM is expected to generate 2.5X faster real income growth than the S&P 500 and 10X faster income growth than a 60/40.
What inflation-adjusted returns do analysts expect in the future?
Time Frame (Years) | 7.6% CAGR Inflation-Adjusted S&P Consensus | 8.4% Inflation-Adjusted Aristocrats Consensus | 12.1% CAGR Inflation-Adjusted MMM Consensus | Difference Between Inflation-Adjusted 3M Consensus Vs. S&P Consensus |
5 | $1,445.67 | $1,493.29 | $1,772.59 | $326.92 |
10 | $2,089.97 | $2,229.92 | $3,142.09 | $1,052.12 |
15 | $3,021.42 | $3,329.92 | $5,569.64 | $2,548.23 |
20 | $4,367.98 | $4,972.54 | $9,872.71 | $5,504.73 |
25 | $6,314.67 | $7,425.45 | $17,500.30 | $11,185.63 |
30 | $9,128.95 | $11,088.36 | $31,020.92 | $21,891.97 |
(Source: DK Research Terminal, FactSet)
Management and analysts believe that MMM could potentially deliver 31X inflation-adjusted returns over the next 30 years.
Time Frame (Years) | Ratio Aristocrats/S&P Consensus | Ratio Inflation-Adjusted 3M Consensus vs. S&P consensus |
5 | 1.03 | 1.23 |
10 | 1.07 | 1.50 |
15 | 1.10 | 1.84 |
20 | 1.14 | 2.26 |
25 | 1.18 | 2.77 |
30 | 1.21 | 3.40 |
(Source: DK Research Terminal, FactSet)
Which is potentially 3.4X more than the S&P 500 and 180% more than the dividend aristocrats.
(Source: DK Automated Investment Decision Tool)
For anyone comfortable with its risk profile, MMM is one of the most reasonable and prudent dividend aristocrats you can buy today.
There are many ways to measure safety and quality and I factor in pretty much all of them.
The Dividend Kings' overall quality scores are based on a 253-point model that includes:
Dividend safety
Balance sheet strength
Credit ratings
Credit default swap medium-term bankruptcy risk data
Short and long-term bankruptcy risk
Accounting and corporate fraud risk
Profitability and business model
Growth consensus estimates
Management growth guidance
Historical earnings growth rates
Historical cash flow growth rates
Historical dividend growth rates
Historical sales growth rates
Cost of capital
GF Scores
Long-term risk-management scores from MSCI, Morningstar, FactSet, S&P, Reuters'/Refinitiv, and Just Capital
Management quality
Dividend-friendly corporate culture/income dependability
Long-term total returns (a Ben Graham sign of quality)
Analyst consensus long-term return potential
In fact, it includes over 1,000 fundamental metrics including the 12 rating agencies we use to assess fundamental risk.
credit and risk management ratings make up 41% of the DK safety and quality model
dividend/balance sheet/risk ratings make up 82% of the DK safety and quality model
How do we know that our safety and quality model works well?
During the two worst recessions in 75 years, our safety model 87% of blue-chip dividend cuts, the ultimate baptism by fire for any dividend safety model.
How does MMM score on our comprehensive safety and quality models?
3M Dividend Safety
Rating | Dividend Kings Safety Score (162 Point Safety Model) | Approximate Dividend Cut Risk (Average Recession) | Approximate Dividend Cut Risk In Pandemic Level Recession |
1 - unsafe | 0% to 20% | over 4% | 16+% |
2- below average | 21% to 40% | over 2% | 8% to 16% |
3 - average | 41% to 60% | 2% | 4% to 8% |
4 - safe | 61% to 80% | 1% | 2% to 4% |
5- very safe | 81% to 100% | 0.5% | 1% to 2% |
MMM | 93% | 0.5% | 1.4% |
Risk Rating | Low-Risk (71st industry percentile risk-management consensus) | A+ Negative outlook credit rating 0.6% 30-year bankruptcy risk | 20% OR LESS Max Risk Cap Recommendation (Each) |
Long-Term Dependability
Company | DK Long-Term Dependability Score | Interpretation | Points |
Non-Dependable Companies | 21% or below | Poor Dependability | 1 |
Low Dependability Companies | 22% to 60% | Below-Average Dependability | 2 |
S&P 500/Industry Average | 61% (61% to 70% range) | Average Dependability | 3 |
Above-Average | 71% to 80% | Very Dependable | 4 |
Very Good | 81% or higher | Exceptional Dependability | 5 |
MMM | 89% | Exceptional Dependability | 5 |
Overall Quality
MMM | Final Score | Rating |
Safety | 93% | 5/5 Very Safe |
Business Model | 90% | 3/3 Wide And Stable Moat |
Dependability | 89% | 5/5 Exceptional Dependability |
Total | 92% | 13/13 Ultra SWAN Dividend King |
Risk Rating | 3/3 Low-Risk | |
20% OR LESS Max Risk Cap Rec | 5% Margin of Safety For A Potentially Good Buy |
MMM is the 47th highest quality company on the Masterlist.
91st percentile
How significant is this? The DK 500 Master List is one of the world's best watchlists including
every dividend aristocrat (S&P companies with 25+ year dividend growth streaks)
every dividend champion (every company, including foreign, with 25+ year dividend growth streaks)
every dividend king (every company with 50+ year dividend growth streaks)
every foreign aristocrat (every company with 20+ year dividend growth streaks)
40 of the world's best growth stocks
In other words, even among the world's best companies, MMM is higher quality than 84% of them.
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing was founded in 1902 in St. Paul, MN.
It's survived and thrived for 120 years through:
In other words, 3M is built to last and will likely outlive us all.
The 64-year dividend growth streak means the dividend has grown every year since 1958
(Source: earnings presentation)
3M has plenty of challenges in the short and medium-term but these are now baked into analyst estimates.
So let's take a look at those to see why 3M's investment thesis remains intact.
Ben Graham recommended combining qualitative (the story) analysis with quantitative analysis looking at the past, present, and likely future.
Rating Agency | Credit Rating | 30-Year Default/Bankruptcy Risk | Chance of Losing 100% Of Your Investment 1 In |
S&P | A+ Negative Outlook | 0.60% | 166.7 |
Moody's | A1 (A+ equivalent) Stable Outlook | 0.60% | 166.7 |
Consensus | A+ Stable Outlook | 0.60% | 166.7 |
(Source: S&P, Fitch, Moody's)
Rating agencies estimate 3M's fundamental risk at 0.6%.
S&P Global Ratings' negative outlook on 3M reflects at least a one-third chance that we could lower our ratings if the company fails to delever its balance sheet in the manner that we expect over the next 12-24 months. Although we expect operating performance to improve over the next two years, there are risks to our forecast if end-market weakness continues to persist, if there are material calls on the company's cash from litigation expenses or liabilities, or if the company pursues more aggressive financial policies, particularly with regards to share repurchases or further debt-financed acquisitions.
We could lower our rating on 3M if we expect its net-adjusted debt-to-EBITDA ratio to remain above the 2x area and FOCF weakens to less than 25% of the debt. We believe these metrics would provide a limited cushion in the event of potential future material calls on cash, including PFA-related litigation, and would cause us to lower the rating.
We could revise the outlook to stable if the company reduces its leverage to below 2x while maintaining FOCF above 25% of outstanding debt. Under this scenario, we would also need to be confident that potential settlements or legal expenses related to PFAS litigation are not expected to materially weaken these improved credit measures." - S&P
S&P downgraded MMM in February 2020 at the start of the pandemic citing legal liability risk and concerns about short-term leverage.
Year | Debt/EBITDA | Net Debt/EBITDA (3.0 Or Less Safe According To Credit Rating Agencies) | Interest Coverage (8+ Safe) |
2020 | 2.15 | 1.62 | 13.72 |
2021 | 1.87 | 1.38 | 15.16 |
2022 | 1.70 | 1.23 | 19.63 |
2023 | 1.63 | 1.00 | 20.93 |
2024 | 1.58 | 0.73 | 19.43 |
Annualized Change | -7.35% | -17.95% | 9.10% |
(Source: FactSet Research Terminal)
Year | Total Debt (Millions) | Cash | Net Debt (Millions) | Interest Cost (Millions) | EBITDA (Millions) | Operating Income (Millions) |
2020 | $18,795 | $4,634 | $14,161 | $499 | $8,755 | $6,844 |
2021 | $17,363 | $4,564 | $12,799 | $486 | $9,285 | $7,369 |
2022 | $16,406 | $4,744 | $11,914 | $394 | $9,657 | $7,734 |
2023 | $16,406 | $5,319 | $10,092 | $391 | $10,095 | $8,185 |
2024 | $16,678 | $4,354 | $7,730 | $443 | $10,545 | $8,607 |
2025 | NA | NA | NA | NA | $11,549 | $9,536 |
Annualized Growth | -2.94% | -1.55% | -14.04% | -2.93% | 5.70% | 6.86% |
(Source: FactSet Research Terminal)
MMM's debt is drifting steadily lower and its net debt is falling at 14% per year while its cash flows are growing at mid-single digits.
(Source: FactSet Research Terminal)
(Source: FactSet Research Terminal)
(Source: FactSet Research Terminal)
Credit default SWAPs are the insurance policies bond investors take out against default.
The GF Score is a ranking system that has been found to be closely correlated to the long-term performances of stocks by backtesting from 2006 to 2021." - GuruFocus
GF Score takes five key aspects into consideration. They are:
MMM's excellent score of 90/100 confirms its industry-leading fundamental quality.
(Source: Gurufocus Premium)
MMM's historical profitability is in the top 10% of its peers
Metric | TTM | Industry Percentile | Major Conglomerates More Profitable Than MMM (Out Of 519) |
Gross Margins | 45.95% | 81.52 | 96 |
Operating Margin | 20.66% | 87.17 | 67 |
Net Margin | 15.84% | 82.7 | 90 |
Return On Equity | 38.52% | 95.79 | 22 |
Return On Assets | 11.82% | 92.68 | 38 |
Returns On Invested Capital | 15.58% | 92.38 | 40 |
Return On Capital (Greenblatt) | 53.42% | 83.85 | 84 |
Return On Capital Employed | 19.18% | 86.19 | 72 |
Average | 27.62% | 87.79 | 63 |
(Source: GuruFocus Premium)
In the last year, MMM's profitability has been in the top 12% of peers.
Over the last 30 years, MMM's profitability has been relatively stable adjusting for the natural cyclicality of its industry.
Year | FCF Margin | EBITDA Margin | EBIT (Operating) Margin | Net Margin | Return On Capital Expansion | Return On Capital Forecast |
2020 | 20.5% | 27.2% | 21.3% | 15.8% | 1.10 | |
2021 | 16.5% | 26.3% | 20.8% | 16.7% | TTM ROC | 53.42% |
2022 | 15.7% | 26.9% | 21.6% | 17.2% | Latest ROC | 49.59% |
2023 | 16.6% | 27.3% | 22.1% | 17.3% | 2025 ROC | 58.78% |
2024 | 17.5% | 27.2% | 22.2% | 17.0% | 2025 ROC | 54.57% |
2025 | 17.9% | 27.8% | 22.9% | NA | Average | 56.68% |
2026 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Industry Median | 13.66% |
2027 | NA | NA | NA | NA | MMM/Industry Median | 4.15 |
Annualized Growth | -2.71% | 0.42% | 1.52% | 1.88% | Vs. S&P | 3.88 |
Annualized Growth (Post Pandemic) | 1.99% | 1.41% | 2.42% | 0.57% |
(Source: FactSet Research Terminal)
Looking beyond the pandemic analysts expect 3M's industry-leading margins to keep rising steadily.
Return on capital is annual pre-tax profit/operating capital (the money it takes to run the business). ROC is Greenblatt's gold standard proxy for quality and moatiness.
For MMM ROC was 53% in the last year and is expected to remain relatively stable over the coming years.
By the definition of one of the greatest investors in history, MMM is about 4X higher quality than its peers and 4X higher quality than the S&P 500.
Over the last 30 years, MMM's ROC has been trending higher at 2.7% annually, confirming its wide and stable moat.
At the current cash-adjusted PE of 9X, you might think 3M is a flailing or even dying company. Here's what analysts actually expect.
Year | Sales | Free Cash Flow | EBITDA | EBIT (Operating Income) | Net Income |
2020 | $32,184 | $6,612 | $8,755 | $6,844 | $5,088 |
2021 | $35,355 | $5,851 | $9,285 | $7,369 | $5,921 |
2022 | $35,849 | $5,629 | $9,657 | $7,734 | $6,161 |
2023 | $36,972 | $6,142 | $10,095 | $8,185 | $6,386 |
2024 | $38,711 | $6,759 | $10,545 | $8,607 | $6,594 |
2025 | $41,578 | $7,444 | $11,549 | $9,536 | NA |
Annualized Growth | 5.26% | 2.40% | 5.70% | 6.86% | 6.70% |
Annualized Growth (Post Pandemic) | 4.14% | 6.20% | 5.61% | 6.66% | 3.65% |
Cumulative Over The Next 3 Years | $111,532 | $18,530 | $30,297 | $24,526 | $19,141 |
(Source: FactSet Research Terminal)
MMM is expected to grow steadily over time and convert 97% of its net income into free cash flow.
Modest but steady growth in both the top and bottom lines with almost $19 billion in free cash flow over the next three years.
Year | Dividend Consensus | FCF Consensus | FCF Payout Ratio | Retained (Post-Dividend) Free Cash Flow | Buyback Potential | Debt Repayment Potential |
2022 | $6.02 | $8.24 | 73.1% | $1,263 | 1.65% | 7.7% |
2023 | $6.24 | $9.57 | 65.2% | $1,895 | 2.48% | 11.5% |
2024 | $6.38 | $12.61 | 50.6% | $3,545 | 4.64% | 21.6% |
Total 2022 Through 2024 | $18.64 | $30.42 | 61.3% | $6,702.82 | 8.77% | 40.86% |
Annualized Rate | 2.95% | 23.71% | -16.78% | 67.52% | 67.52% | 67.52% |
(Source: FactSet Research Terminal)
Credit rating agencies consider 60% a safe payout ratio for industrials.
MMM's payout ratio was elevated during the pandemic and management is using very conservative dividend increases to bring it back down to safe levels.
By 2024 3M's consensus FCF payout ratio is down to 51% and likely it will keep falling until we get further information about actual future legal liabilities.
3M's post-dividend retained free cash flow for the next three years is an estimated $7 billion, enough to pay off 41% of its debt, or buy back 9% of shares at current valuations.
Year | Consensus Buybacks ($ Millions) | % Of Shares (At Current Valuations) | Market Cap |
2022 | $2,085.0 | 2.7% | $76,442 |
2023 | $2,011.0 | 2.6% | $76,442 |
2024 | $2,195.0 | 2.9% | $76,442 |
Total 2022-2024 | $6,291.00 | 8.2% | $76,442 |
Annualized Rate | 2.81% | Average Annual Buybacks | $2,097.00 |
(Source: FactSet Research Terminal)
Analysts expect 3M to still buy back $2.1 billion worth of shares during the next three years, a total of $6.3 billion that could potentially reduce the share count by nearly 3% per year at current valuations.
3M's historical net buyback rate over 38 years is 1.3% per year.
Time Frame (Years) | Net Buyback Rate | Shares Remaining | Net Shares Repurchased | Each Share You Own Is Worth X Times More (Not Including Future Growth And Dividends) |
5 | 1.3% | 93.67% | 6.33% | 1.07 |
10 | 1.3% | 87.73% | 12.27% | 1.14 |
15 | 1.3% | 82.18% | 17.82% | 1.22 |
20 | 1.3% | 76.97% | 23.03% | 1.30 |
25 | 1.3% | 72.10% | 27.90% | 1.39 |
30 | 1.3% | 67.53% | 32.47% | 1.48 |
(Source: DK Research Terminal, Ycharts)
If MMM buys back shares at its historical rate then it could repurchase 33% of shares over the next 30 years.
Time Frame (Years) | Net Buyback Rate | Shares Remaining | Net Shares Repurchased | Each Share You Own Is Worth X Times More (Not Including Future Growth And Dividends) |
5 | 2.8% | 86.72% | 13.28% | 1.15 |
10 | 2.8% | 75.20% | 24.80% | 1.33 |
15 | 2.8% | 65.21% | 34.79% | 1.53 |
20 | 2.8% | 56.55% | 43.45% | 1.77 |
25 | 2.8% | 49.04% | 50.96% | 2.04 |
30 | 2.8% | 42.53% | 57.47% | 2.35 |
(Source: DK Research Terminal, Ycharts)
If MMM buys back shares as aggressively as analysts currently expect, over 30 years it should repurchase almost 60% of its shares.
(Source: FactSet Research Terminal)
How accurate are analyst forecasts based on management guidance?
(Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet Research) (Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet Research)
(Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet Research) (Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet Research) (Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet Research) (Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet Research)
Analysts expect MMM to keep growing at its historical 8% rate while the margin-of-error adjusted growth range is consistent with its historical growth rates as well.
(Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet Research) (Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet Research) (Source: FAST Graphs, FactSet Research)
For 20 years, outside of bear markets and bubbles millions of income growth investors have consistently paid between 18.5 and 20.5X earnings for MMM.
Metric | Historical Fair Value Multiples (all-Years) | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 12-Month Forward Fair Value |
5-Year Average Yield | 3.25% | $181.23 | $183.38 | $183.38 | $196.31 | NA | |
13-Year Median Yield | 2.53% | $232.81 | NA | NA | $252.17 | NA | |
25- Year Average Yield | 2.57% | $229.18 | $231.91 | $231.91 | $248.25 | NA | |
Earnings | 19.68 | $199.18 | $209.40 | $221.01 | $227.98 | $241.08 | |
Average | $208.36 | $206.32 | $209.94 | $228.91 | $241.08 | $208.13 | |
Current Price | $129.77 | ||||||
Discount To Fair Value | 37.72% | 37.10% | 38.19% | 43.31% | 46.17% | 37.65% | |
Upside To Fair Value (NOT Including Dividends) | 60.56% | 58.99% | 61.78% | 76.40% | 85.77% | 60.38%n (65% including dividend) | |
2022 EPS | 2023 EPS | 2021 Weighted EPS | 2022 Weighted EPS | 12-Month Forward EPS | 12-Month Average Fair Value Forward PE | Current Forward PE | |
$10.64 | $11.23 | $5.32 | $5.62 | $10.94 | 19.0 | 11.9 |
3M's historical fair value is about 19X earnings and today it trades at 11.9X and just 9.2X cash-adjusted earnings.
Analyst Median 12-Month Price Target | Morningstar Fair Value Estimate |
$158.57 (14.1 PE) | $186.00 (17.0 PE) |
Discount To Price Target (Not A Fair Value Estimate) | Discount To Fair Value |
18.16% | 30.23% |
Upside To Price Target (Not Including Dividend) | Upside To Fair Value (Not Including Dividend) |
22.19% | 43.33% |
12-Month Median Total Return Price (Including Dividend) | Fair Value + 12-Month Dividend |
$164.53 | $191.96 |
Discount To Total Price Target (Not A Fair Value Estimate) | Discount To Fair Value + 12-Month Dividend |
21.13% | 32.40% |
Upside To Price Target ( Including Dividend) | Upside To Fair Value + Dividend |
26.79% | 47.92% |
Morningstar's DCF model estimates MMM is worth 17X earnings, which is 91% statistically likely to be too conservative, though even Morningstar thinks MMM is a very undervalued company.
Analysts expect a 27% total return within a year, which requires it to trade at just 14X earnings within a year.
I don't make recommendations based on 12-month forecasts but on whether the margin of safety is sufficient to compensate for a company's risk profile.
Rating | Margin Of Safety For Low-Risk 13/13 Ultra SWAN quality companies | 2022 Price | 2023 Price | 12-Month Forward Fair Value |
Potentially Reasonable Buy | 0% | $206.32 | $209.94 | $208.13 |
Potentially Good Buy | 5% | $196.00 | $199.44 | $197.72 |
Potentially Strong Buy | 15% | $175.37 | $178.45 | $176.91 |
Potentially Very Strong Buy | 25% | $147.00 | $157.45 | $156.10 |
Potentially Ultra-Value Buy | 35% | $134.11 | $136.46 | $135.28 |
Currently | $129.77 | 37.10% | 38.19% | 37.65% |
Upside To Fair Value (Not Including Dividends) | 58.99% | 61.78% | 60.38% |
For anyone comfortable with its risk profile MMM is a potential Ultra Value buy.
There are no risk-free companies and no company is right for everyone. You have to be comfortable with the fundamental risk profile.
How long it takes for a company's investment thesis to break depends on the quality of the company.
Quality | Years For The Thesis To Break Entirely |
Below-Average | 1 |
Average | 2 |
Above-Average | 3 |
Blue-Chip | 4 |
SWAN | 5 |
Super SWAN | 6 |
Ultra SWAN | 7 |
100% Quality Companies (MSFT, LOW, and MA) | 8 |
These are my personal rule of thumb for when to sell a stock if the investment thesis has broken. MMM is highly unlikely to suffer such catastrophic declines in fundamentals.
How do we quantify, monitor, and track such a complex risk profile? By doing what big institutions do.
Rating Agency | Industry Percentile | Rating Agency Classification |
MSCI 37 Metric Model | 100.0% | AAA Industry Leader, Stable Trend |
Morningstar/Sustainalytics 20 Metric Model | 85.7% | 33.6/100 High-Risk |
Reuters'/Refinitiv 500+ Metric Model | 96.7% | Excellent |
S&P 1,000+ Metric Model | 66.0% | Above-Average, Stable Trend |
Just Capital 19 Metric Model | 85.4% | Very Good |
FactSet | 30.0% | Below-Average, Positive Trend |
Morningstar Global Percentile (All 15,000 Rated Companies) | 26.0% | Poor |
Just Capital Global Percentile (All 954 Rated US Companies) | 78.7% | Good |
Consensus | 71% | Low-Risk, Good Risk-Management, Stable Trend |
(Sources: MSCI, Morningstar, FactSet, S&P, Just Capital, Reuters)
MMM's Long-Term Risk Management Is The 168th Best In The Master List (66th Percentile)
Classification | Average Consensus LT Risk-Management Industry Percentile | Risk-Management Rating |
S&P Global (SPGI) #1 Risk Management In The Master List | 94 | Exceptional |
Strong ESG Stocks | 78 | Good - Bordering On Very Good |
Foreign Dividend Stocks | 75 | Good |
3M | 71 | Good |
Ultra SWANs | 71 | Good |
Low Volatility Stocks | 68 | Above-Average |
Dividend Aristocrats | 67 | Above-Average |
Dividend Kings | 63 | Above-Average |
Master List average | 62 | Above-Average |
Hyper-Growth stocks | 61 | Above-Average |
Monthly Dividend Stocks | 60 | Above-Average |
Dividend Champions | 57 | Average |
(Source: DK Research Terminal)
3M's risk-management consensus is in the top 34% of the world's highest quality companies and similar to that of such other blue-chips as
The bottom line is that all companies have risks, and MMM is good at managing theirs.
When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do sir?" - John Maynard Keynes
There are no sacred cows at iREIT or Dividend Kings. Wherever the fundamentals lead we always follow. That's the essence of disciplined financial science, the math behind retiring rich and staying rich in retirement.
I can't tell you when MMM will bottom, that's likely to depend on a lot of macro and company-specific factors.
Stocks don't stop falling because bad news stops coming but when the bad news is fully priced in.
Here's what I can tell you with high confidence about 3M right now.
Be greedy when others are fearful." - Warren Buffett
If you're tired of worrying about the market's volatile swings, then 3M is one of the reasonable and prudent choices among world-class dividend aristocrats.
If you're tired of fretting about inflation, then why not entrust some of your savings to a company that has successfully dealt with 22% inflation in the past?
If you're looking for generous, safe, and steadily growing income in all economic and market conditions, well 3M has a 64-year dividend growth streak proving it's a potentially excellent choice today.
And with the company now trading at the lowest P/E in 11 years, the reward/risk ratio is the best it's been since the Great Recession.
In other words, if you're looking to make your own luck on Wall Street, 3M is one of the best Buffett-like "fat pitch" blue-chips you can buy today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dividend Kings helps you determine the best safe dividend stocks to buy via our Automated Investment Decision Tool, Research Terminal, Phoenix Watchlist, Company Screener, and Daily Blue-Chip Deal Videos.
Membership also includes
Click here for a two-week free trial so we can help you achieve better long-term total returns and your financial dreams.
This article was written by
Adam Galas is a co-founder of Wide Moat Research ("WMR"), a subscription-based publisher of financial information, serving over 5,000 investors around the world. WMR has a team of experienced multi-disciplined analysts covering all dividend categories, including REITs, MLPs, BDCs, and traditional C-Corps.
The WMR brands include: (1) The Intelligent REIT Investor (newsletter), (2) The Intelligent Dividend Investor (newsletter), (3) iREIT on Alpha (Seeking Alpha), and (4) The Dividend Kings (Seeking Alpha).
I'm a proud Army veteran and have seven years of experience as an analyst/investment writer for Dividend Kings, iREIT, The Intelligent Dividend Investor, The Motley Fool, Simply Safe Dividends, Seeking Alpha, and the Adam Mesh Trading Group. I'm proud to be one of the founders of The Dividend Kings, joining forces with Brad Thomas, Chuck Carnevale, and other leading income writers to offer the best premium service on Seeking Alpha's Market Place.
My goal is to help all people learn how to harness the awesome power of dividend growth investing to achieve their financial dreams and enrich their lives.
With 24 years of investing experience, I've learned what works and more importantly, what doesn't, when it comes to building long-term wealth and safe and dependable income streams in all economic and market conditions.
Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of MMM either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: Dividend Kings owns MMM in our portfolios.