Safehold: Did We Miss The Bottom?

Aug. 07, 2022 5:06 AM ETSafehold Inc. (SAFE)O, ONL, OPI, OPINL, STAR, STAR.PD, STAR.PG, STAR.PI, WPC45 Comments

Summary

  • We have had a conviction sell on Safehold when it was trading in the high $70s.
  • In our last article, we suggested $25-$30 would likely form a buyable opportunity.
  • Did the 52-week low of $33.61 mark the buyable opportunity we missed?
  • I do much more than just articles at Conservative Income Portfolio: Members get access to model portfolios, regular updates, a chat room, and more. Learn More »

Miniature colorful house on stack coins

jaturonoofer

We have covered Safehold Inc. (NYSE:SAFE) before and also discussed its parent iStar (STAR) in a different article.

When we last covered SAFE we had a clear message.

A trough would come next year in the stock as it trades at 12X-15X earnings ($25-$30), which would still be more than 25X-30X operating cash flow. We are actually long the iStar Inc. PFD G 7.65% (STAR.PG) as we think that STAR will merge with SAFE and redeem the most expensive cost of financing, the preferred shares. So we love the idea of lending to SAFE, and we might even buy their bonds if we get a 6% plus yield. But we think equity holders will have a hard time clawing back losses. Regardless of how it plays out, it will be interesting to watch.

Source: The Bubble And Its Consequences

Now the market loves to mess with investor minds and it certainly did mess with our thinking. We are talking about this.

-

Seeking Alpha

The stock did get quite close to our target and reversed nicely. Do we close the chapter on the downside? We look at the Q2-2022 results and tell you why we think we are not close to being done.

What Is The FFO?

When you see earnings from REITs, the GAAP numbers, pretty much everyone disregards them and focuses on the funds from operations (FFO). Why is that? Well, the main reason is that the true earnings power and the true dividend paying power, lay in the direction of FFO. Now, SAFE reports GAAP earnings and that is the headline number you see. You won't find a FFO in their numbers despite the fact that it is a REIT.

In their defense, GAAP numbers have one thing working for them and that is that since most of their asset base is actual land, there is no depreciation. So from that perspective, GAAP works. But from a dividend paying perspective, GAAP EPS is so far removed away from reality that one cannot even think about using that. Let's look at the Q2-2022 numbers as an example. The reported GAAP numbers were at 37 cents. For the first six months, this totaled 79 cents. Both are shown below.

-

SAFE 10-Q

At first glance, that looks like amazing growth and one that really covers the dividend by a huge margin. But the cash flow tells a very different story.

Cash Flow

Starting with the $47.6 million net income, we have the statement of cash flows below.

-

SAFE 10-Q

We have highlighted a few items and we will go through them in 3 groups.

1) Changes in working capital, which is $23.492 million. To get to real cash flow we always assume that this number is not there. If it is positive, we subtract it out and vice versa. So cash flow without this was $23.2 million. In 2021, we would add this back and get to about 19.0 million. You can see how our adjusted numbers make more sense than the raw ones presented. This $23.2 million for 2022 is our baseline cash flow and as you can see, it is half the net income.

2) The second group is the one in the middle.

-

SAFE 10-Q

As a huge portion of SAFE's revenues are earned from a GAAP point of view, but actually paid way later (we are talking decades here), they are subtracted from cash flow. The last line adds to cash as SAFE also has debt in which the interest is paid later.

3) The final aspect here are the stock based compensation and non-cash management fees. They total about $11 million and if these were paid in cash, cash flow would have been about $12 million for the first half of 2022.

Dividend Paying Capability

If we go by the cash flow adjusted for working capital changes, SAFE could pay $23 million and actually paid $20.2 million in dividends.

-

SAFE 10-Q

So in theory, it could boost the dividend a little more. But the free cash flow yield is close to the dividend yield of 1.7%, and nowhere close to earnings yield of 4.3%. Even this free cash flow yield would be about half the dividend yield, if stock based compensation and non-cash management fees were actually paid in cash.

Verdict

The bull argument is built on owning the building at the end of the lease. An extension of that is defaults will be extremely rare. We completely agree with those two facts, just not the interpretation of what those facts should mean. Strong triple net companies have historically had extremely low defaults. Here is Realty Income's (O) 2009 report. FFO per share fell marginally (less than 3%) between 2007 and 2009. Dividends were raised by 10%.

-

Realty Income 2009 Annual Report

Why was there such a robust performance? That is because occupancy fell one percent between 2007 and 2009.

-

Realty Income 2009 Annual Report

One percent. The fat in our milk falls more than that in recessions. Realty Income is hardly unique here. W. P. Carey (WPC) reported identical adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) in 2008 and 2009. Our point here is that the additional margin of safety for SAFE is so small (it is not like the tenant will pay you extra in a crisis) and the discounted value of a building 100 years from now is so abysmally low, that we would only pay normal FFO multiples for SAFE. We also think investors are vastly overestimating the usefulness of inheriting single tenant office buildings (46% of SAFE's gross book value) in the middle of crisis. These are incredibly hard to lease in the best of times and following the exploits of Orion Office REIT Inc. (ONL) and Office Properties Income Trust (OPI) should tell you what we are talking about.

Chart
Data by YCharts
Chart
Data by YCharts

Currently, valuation for SAFE is still so outlandish that we don't think the bottom is in or even close to being in. It is generating less than $50 million in adjusted free cash flow annually on its $2.5 billion market cap. Look for mid $20s for an entry point if you like this stock. That is our opinion and just like our call when this stock was in the $70s we are doubling down on it.

Please note that this is not financial advice. It may seem like it, sound like it, but surprisingly, it is not. Investors are expected to do their own due diligence and consult with a professional who knows their objectives and constraints.

Are you looking for Real Yields which reduce portfolio volatility?

Conservative Income Portfolio targets the best value stocks with the highest margins of safety. The volatility of these investments is further lowered using the best priced options. Our Cash Secured Put and Covered Call Portfolios are designed to reduce volatility while generating 7-9% yields. We focus on being the house and take the opposite side of the gambler.

Learn more about our method & why it might be right for your portfolio.

This article was written by

Trapping Value profile picture
35.03K Followers
The best way to provide income in today's markets while reducing risks

Conservative Income Portfolio is designed for investors who want reliable income with the lowest volatility.


High Valuations have distorted the investing landscape and investors are poised for exceptionally low forward returns. Using cash secured puts and covered calls to harvest income off value income stocks is the best way forward. We "lock-in" high yields when volatility is high and capture multiple years of dividends in advance to reach the goal of producing 7-9% yields with the lowest volatility.

Preferred Stock Trader is Comanager of Conservative Income Portfolio and shares research and resources with author. He manages our fixed income side looking for opportunistic investments with 12% plus potential returns. 

Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of STAR.PI, STAR.PG either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Recommended For You

Comments (45)

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.