Emerging Market ETFs Love The Smell Of China Stimulus

by: Gary Gordon

Developed markets have been weighing the perceived positives in Greek exit polls against the perceived negatives in Spanish bank bailouts. In contrast, emerging markets seem less concerned with the European drama. The “emergers” are focused squarely upon China.

Need proof? Consider the post-holiday headlines for Tuesday, May 29. The euro slid to its lowest level against the U.S. dollar in more than two years. A prominent ratings agency downgraded Spain’s sovereign debt. And U.S. consumer confidence via the Conference Board’s Consumer Consumer Index fell to its lowest level in eight months. Yet single country ETFs, as well as global sector ETFs with significant ties to China’s economic well-being, skyrocketed.

ETFs That Are Incredibly Dependent On China’s Growth
May 29 Approx %
Market Vectors Rare Earth Strategic Metals (NYSEARCA:REMX) 4.75%
iShares MSCI Taiwan (NYSEARCA:EWT) 4.24%
SPDR S&P Russia (NYSEARCA:RBL) 3.33%
iShares MSCI Australia (NYSEARCA:EWA) 3.06%
Market Vectors Steel (NYSEARCA:SLX) 2.90%
Market Vectors China (NYSEARCA:PEK) 2.86%
iShares MSCI South Africa (NYSEARCA:EZA) 1.71%
S&P 500 SPDR Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY) 1.21%

So why is there so much enthusiasm on this particular occasion? Why are China “A” shares via Market Vectors China (PEK) skyrocketing? Why are emergers and other exporters to China leading the one-day charge?

First, Shanghai Securities News reported that China’s biggest banks appeared to have accelerated lending as Chinese leaders in Beijing begin to fast-track infrastructure enhancement. Second, Credit Suisse suggested that the government is likely to pump $315 billion into those infrastructure projects.

Speculative? I don’t think so. From my vantage point, Chinese leaders have been straightforward about their intentions to stimulate and they’re not about to let the economy slip-slide away without a fight. (Not in 2012 ... not in the “Year of the Dragon.”)

Of course, there are those who think that the China growth story is over. Bears insist upon describing China in terms that evoke traumatic memories (e.g., “housing bubble”) or anxiety-riddled emotions (e.g., “hard landing”). Most of those bears (not all) do not understand Chinese culture, the practice of 50%-down in real estate transactions, let alone the fact that property and stock assets have already deflated. Most simply see the world through rust-color glasses.

In contrast, while I do not currently have ETF exposure to the world’s second largest economy (stop-limit orders and trend identification have kept me safely on the sidelines), I believe whole-heartedly in its long-term prospects. The fact that China “A shares” are up more than the S&P 500 in 2012 is worthy of note.

In fact, bearishness on Chinese equities has the same tenor as bearishness on the U.S. dollar once had. Not that long ago, The Economist depicted George Washington piloting a fiery U.S. dollar bill as it crashed to the earth in flames. Over the next 12 months, the U.S. dollar Index packed on 15% against a basket of world currencies.

The most recent edition of The Economist calls China’s economy into question with a 14-page special report. Could the surprisingly accurate “Magazine Indicator” be flashing a contrarian buy signal? Hard to say ... though the price ratio for Market Vectors China (PEK) relative to the S&P 500 is on the upswing.

Click to enlarge

PEK-SPY Price Ratio

Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.

About this article:

Want to share your opinion on this article? Add a comment.
Disagree with this article? .
To report a factual error in this article, click here