AOL Revenue Continues to Slide

| About: Time Warner (TWX)

AOL’s revenue and operating income continued to slide as the parent Time Warner (NYSE:TWX) focuses on advertising. For the fourth quarter, AOL reported operating income of $274 million on revenue of $1.25 billion. That’s down from operating income of $910 million on revenue of $1.84 billion.

AOL’s results (Time Warner statement) are an interesting sidebar to the Microsoft-Yahoo saga. The Microsoft $44.6 billion bid for Yahoo gives Time Warner an excuse to dump AOL. Perhaps Google would buy AOL. In either case, AOL is in play or it’ll become left out of the advertising consolidation. AOL simply won’t be able to compete in online advertising world dominated by Google and Microsoft.

In the meantime, AOL erosion continues. Nevertheless, it is still amazing that AOL still has 9.3 million access subscribers. Who are these people? And why are they paying for what they could get for free?

But I digress. By revenue AOL is just a hair larger than Time Warner’s publishing business. And in the fourth quarter publishing had more revenue. For 2007, AOL had revenue of $5.18 billion, down from $7.78 billion in 2006. On the bright side, operating income was up for the year to $2 billion in 2007 from $1.89 billion in 2006.

Other notable nuggets:

  • Revenue at AOL was down 33 percent for 2007 and 32 percent for the fourth quarter.
  • Subscription revenue fell 52 percent due to the sale of AOL’s international access business.
  • Adjusted operating income before depreciation and amortization was up 4 percent for 2007. In the fourth quarter that measure of operating income was up 29 percent.
  • In the fourth quarter, AOL had 109 million average monthly domestic unique visitors and 49 billion page views.
  • AOL had 9.3 million U.S. access subscribers at the end of 2007, down 3.8 million from a year ago.

About this article:

Expand
Tagged: , Entertainment - Diversified
Want to share your opinion on this article? Add a comment.
Disagree with this article? .
To report a factual error in this article, click here