Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

4 Coal Companies To Avoid Due To Massive Debt

Jul. 10, 2012 11:22 AM ETARCH, PCXCQ, JRCCQ, ANR34 Comments
Matt Schilling profile picture
Matt Schilling
680 Followers

I understand most companies carry a decently proportionate amount of debt. For example, a company like Microsoft has $58.35 billion in total cash and only $13.15 billion in debt. That equates to a debt-to-total-cash ratio of 0.225.

That said, several coal companies have been piling up significant debt through bonds and other types of senior securities, and as a result one of the names below has already filed for bankruptcy protection. For this screen I have compiled a list of four coal companies, all of which have very troubling amounts of debt -- especially when compared to their total cash.

Symbol

Price

Mkt Cap

Total Debt

Total Cash

Ratio

PCX

0.61

56.12 M

443.58 M

114.99 M

3.85

JRCC

2.87

99.61 M

585.80 M

169.38 M

3.46

ACI

6.67

1.42 B

4.07 B

117.77 M

34.55

ANR

8.02

1.76 B

2.97 B

588.90 M

5.04

Patriot Coal (PCX), which trades in a 52-week range of $0.52/share (52-week low) to $24.99/share (52-week high), has a market cap of $56.12 million. PCX currently has $114.99 million in total cash on its books (it should be noted that the company currently has $101.93 million in operating cash flow and -$94.96 million in free cash flow) and actually has $443.58 million in total debt. That equates to a debt-to-total-cash ratio of 3.85, which, in my opinion, is a very negative catalyst moving forward. Recently trading at an 89.3% discount to its 200-day moving average, PCX has filed the appropriate paperwork for bankruptcy protection.

James River Coal (JRCC), which trades in a 52-week range of $1.90/share (52-week low) to $22.00/share (52-week high), has a market cap of $99.61 million. JRCC currently has $169.38 million in total cash on its books (the company currently has $145.73 million in operating cash flow and -$51.66 million in free cash flow) and has $585.80 million in total debt. That equates

This article was written by

Matt Schilling profile picture
680 Followers
Born: September 5th 1982 Location: Queens/Long Island, New York Marital Status: Married Children: Zoey Marie & Lincoln John Academic: Towson University, B.S. 2006 Major: Political Science Minor(s): English, Economics, & Mathematics I've had a love for the securities markets since I was about 8 years old, and received my first subscription to the Wall Street Journal at 11. I've been obsessed with such mathematical concepts as M-Theory and Chaos Theory since my early days of High School, and have always had a fascination with numbers.

Recommended For You

Comments (34)

PSalerno profile picture
ANR debt level is not as bad as BTU, if you look at debt/equity.
Matt Schilling profile picture
True but that's not what I'm comparing in the article...however I thank you for giving me a foundation for my next coal based article.
wigit5 profile picture
You are doing another?
mjk0259 profile picture
Makes pcx look like the safest one and they went bankrupt. Ratio of debt to cash is not meaningful by itself. Company A could be making $1 billion profit a year vs Company B losing $1 billion a year and B could have more cash and less debt. Which one better?
a
All these companies had more or less similar debt an year back from now when they were trading 80% above today's value! remember ANR aquisition of Massey for $8 b and everyone predicted bright future for black gold ? Our memories are too short lived. shorts squeeze life out of companies and we end up bankrupt. Author is right it is better to avoid debt ridden companies. You are lucky if you still trade and make money.
Matt Schilling profile picture
Thanks For Your Comments :)
b
Yelling Fire in the theater!
g
The issue is not simply about the level of debt, it is about the maturity date for that debt (when it is due) and the interest rate on the debt (how favorable was it obtained). Although ACI has incurred considerable debt as a result of asset purchases, they have recently refinanced this debt to push out the maturity date, and it was also at very reasonable terms. Debt that matures in the short-term is the bigger issue when considering financial impacts and potential bankruptcy.
davdws profile picture
When it comes to Coal, its all about squeezing out your competition. They all can control the cost , by reducing demand...but if the smaller companies, weak in cash, need every penny of FCF to pay their bills, they can't be a leader in reducing the supply pipeline. Yes, JRCC, and a few others listed are at risk of being pushed out... the strong will survive. We will probably see another BK or maybe even 2 in the next 12 months. And for a short-term grab, i'm looking for JRCC to come down just a little bit more, then i'll throw a little money at it, when it rises, i'm out. Play the dips, that's whats great about the COAL stocks now.
Matt Schilling profile picture
Its a very good possibility from that angle
davdws profile picture
on re-read, i meant...

By Reducing SUPPLY (not reducing demand) ha ha ha
Falconflight profile picture
JRCC met/steam ratio is approx 55/45 since acquiring Int'l Resources last year with the resultant debt for the purchase. Obviously if prices fail to significantly increase throughout 2013 into 2014 many companies will face dire results. Otherwise, this cyclical business has experienced repeated boom and busts with all the same challenges being experienced right now. A little context would be helpful. jmo
phrenk profile picture
phrenk
10 Jul. 2012
The relevant ratio that should be looked at is Total Debt / EBITDA and EBITDA / Interest coverage ratio.
phrenk profile picture
phrenk
10 Jul. 2012
Isnt't a Total Debt / EBITDA ratio more relevant than what is used in this article ?
witmail profile picture
The author is stupid or moron depending on his age. Based on his ratio, ACI is about 10 times more likely to file Ch. 11 than PCX. If stock analysis is that easy, may be retarded can do the job indeed.
blueice profile picture
Witmail, I am glad you limit your postings...
K
I also believe you need to consider when debt is due and free cash flow going forward. If a company has strong FCF and can continue to pay down debt going forward, it is in a decent position to have debt restructured before it comes due.

With reasonable FCF, debt holders may even consider allowing debt to be repurchased below par instead of allowing a company to file BK and risk getting much less return on their debt. For example, debt bought back at 50 cents on the dollar is much better than only getting 20-30 cents on the dollar and waiting through a potentially long BK to get it.

So, I suggest fellow investors look at debt maturity dates, potential easements on loan covenants, and FCF for important parameters to consider any of these depressed coal plays.
davdws profile picture
Matt, take a look at BTU (some might agree, the strongest in the coal sector) and they have as of last Q1 filling, 952Milllion in Cash and $6.5Billion (with a B) in Debt... does that mean they are heading for BK too? Come on...
j
jaacc5
10 Jul. 2012
In your box you have ANR ratio at 5.01, and ACI at 34.55. In your description, you have ACI debt-to-total-cash ratio of 34.55, but also ANR debt-to-total-cash ratio of 34.55.
Matt Schilling profile picture
I submitted the correction already
LEGaLiZeIT profile picture
Mybe you missed the news about ANR getting a bank holiday? I seriously doubt the creditors are going to petition them into BK after granting them a holiday until 2015 on their covenants less than 2 weeks ago. This is a very weak, and i would go further, misleading analysis. PCX has negative free cash flow to the tune of 100mm vs ANR both ~500mm. Looking at static cash blances is irrelevant, as it is the companies flow generating ability that bears more merit. You even cover the cash flow generation points in your article, but neglect to mention how ANR clearly differs from PCX on this very important metric. Well don't worry, the banks have considered it, hence the holidays granted on ANR covenants and PCX filing CH 11. I guess that is the difference between finance professionals and Seeking Fame blog artists wiritng hack pieces for their own agenda.
Patrick Keefe profile picture
Thanks for the article Matt. I think you made a mistake where your ANR data in the table does not match your ANR commentary data. It looks like you carried it over from ACI. No big deal. Your point is well taken that the debt load needs to be looked. I own ANR.
Matt Schilling profile picture
Correction Submitted...Thank You
b
Not much meat here. If you want to understand the dent burden a company is under, it's important to know what the cost is the service debt on an annual basis and how that amount relates to cash flow. In addition, when is the principal amount due? ACI for example just issued new debt to retire debt that was maturing soon. They've now pushed out the maturity date on a significant portion of their debt well into the future. Management at ACI is taking the appropriate steps to provide their company with enough runway to get through the downturn in coal pricing. I see little risk of default or bankruptcy filing in the next few years. There would need to be continued degredation in pricing or even greater drops in demand for the risk of failure to rise.

Another way to look at the coal industry at this point is: How little of the asset that's in the ground has to be sacrificed at low prices in order to keep the machine (company) afloat until prices return to profitable levels?

If you believe coal prices will never go back up and that demand will only fall in the future, I encourage you to sit in the dark in a hot room for a while.
h
you couldn't even get the correct cash balance on ANR, it is $700 million. what do you mean strongly believe "maybe", doesn't seem very stong.
Matt Schilling profile picture
There's no $700 million dollar number anywhere
h
you posted an article without even reading company's earning report?

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash provided by operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 was $166.6 million compared to $168.4 million for the first quarter of 2011.

Capital expenditures for the first quarter 2012 were $125.8 million, versus $57.1 million in the comparable period last year.

At the end of the first quarter, Alpha had available liquidity of approximately $1.8 billion, consisting of an aggregate $0.7 billion of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, plus $1.1 billion available under the company's secured credit facilities. Total long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt at March 31, 2012, remained approximately $3.0 billion, consistent with December 31, 2011.

http://bit.ly/NlN2mx
wigit5 profile picture
@happydew: agreed, this article seems to be lacking.... a lot.
crazytown profile picture
Another SA contributer rates Alpha Natural Resources a buy

ANR is still a buy because:

"Its EV/EBITDA ratio of 4.7x is the lowest among its peers. Its stock price has also declined the most this year (61%).
It is the top met coal supplier after it acquired Massey Energy Co. "

Also a main reason for the PCX BK filing is that Keystone Industries LLC breached a contract to buy “hundreds of thousands of tons” of coal from PCX. They postponed closing a $625 million, 9.5 percent five-year loan

Also from the SA article

"According to its latest 10-K, PCX derives 76% of its revenues from thermal coal and 24% from metallurgical coal. Although the company reduced thermal coal production and tried to increase its exposure in met coal, thermal coal was still the main source of its revenue generation. "

http://bit.ly/NlLoBk
blueice profile picture
Nice piece, Mr Schilling! This subject of debt is now a very important bit of information...

We have recently began to look at the coal sector, with two of our candidates being your last two...

The Long-Term Debt to Total Capital is 49% for ACI and 28% for ANR...The latter is more acceptable to us..

At this point, we plan to place them on the bottom tier and examine the higher priced models...

Thank you for the data!
Matt Schilling profile picture
Anytime, feel free to shoot me a message to discuss strategy if ever the case with regard to anything for that matter.
blueice profile picture
Thank you, most kindly, Mr Schilling! I will do so...
Barry Robbins profile picture
If the United States was the only country in the world then I would agree with your conclusions. In the real world, India and China do not have enough coal to meet internal demand.
blueice profile picture
This is very true, Mr Robbins, however, even those nations could and perhaps will, enter a slump which would reduce demand...
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!

Related Stocks

SymbolLast Price% Chg
ARCH--
Arch Resources, Inc.
PCXCQ--
Patriot Coal Corp.
JRCCQ--
JAMES RIVER COAL CO NEW
ANR--
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.

Related Analysis

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.