The Secular Shift in Oil

|
Includes: OIL, USO
by: Barry Ritholtz

Back in July, I noted that we had exited many energy positions, and that I would like to see Oil pull back to $105-110 to re-enter them.

This was a tactical, not secular, repositioning.

Why not secular? Well, for a few reasons. Commodities rallies tend to run decades, not years. And the rise of China and India means huge new demands on global energy reserves are going to keep prices elevated far above the old days of $30 oil.

But the biggest reason is this simple chart, via ITF Interim Report on Crude Oil:

>

World_gdp_vs_oil_prod

Sources: Federal Reserve, IAE, ITF

Note that these aren't projections, but are actually based upon data.

You don't have to be a technician to look at that chart and recognize something new is going on. Back in 2003, global GDP began pulling away from Oil production. Note that Oil broke out over $32 shortly thereafter, and never looked back. In the annual BusinessWeek forecasts (2004), I was one of a handful of strategists that picked energy as my top sector.

Its also pretty clear that all of the hullaboo on Off Shore drilling is just so much political nonsense. Yes, we should be drilling. No, it wont make much of a difference in prices. Here's the usually circumspect John Berry, explaining why:

"It's absurd to argue that ending the moratorium on drilling off parts of the U.S. coasts would quickly bring down the high price of gasoline.

This chimera is being touted by President George W. Bush and other Republican politicians, including the party's presumptive presidential nominee, Senator John McCain of Arizona, to deflect blame for what it's costing for a fill-up.

To get around the fact that it would be a decade or more before any oil would be likely to flow, a few partisan analysts have said that the cost of gasoline would fall right away. They argue that the prospect of additional oil supply in the future would lead oil companies to produce more oil immediately because they would expect prices for crude to be lower later on. 

Well, wouldn't that depend on whether a producer had the capacity to pump more oil today, and whether it thought lifting the moratorium would add a significant amount of oil to future supply relative to future demand?    

There are good reasons to question whether another 1 million or 2 million barrels of crude a day would make much difference in prices when world consumption is running at 85 million barrels a day.

About a fourth of all U.S. oil production is already coming from offshore wells, primarily in the central and western portions of the Gulf of Mexico that aren't covered by the moratorium."    

Such silliness.

We should be doing more of everything -- alt energy, nukes, conservation, tax credits, solar, etc. Focusing on this one issue is simply to the exclusion of all else is childish ignorance. In this country, we keep refusing to make the difficult decisions. Everything requires a quick and painless fix.  (We better wise up fast).

Hence, the pullback in Oil may be viewed as a short term trading opportunity.

Sources:
ITF Interim Report on Crude Oil
Interagency Task Force on Commodity Markets
July 2008
http://www.cftc.gov/stellent/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/itfinterimreportoncrudeoil0708.pdf

Offshore Drilling Claims Are a Political Hoax
John M. Berry
Bloomberg, Aug. 1 2008
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_berry&sid=air._Othgtuc

CFTC Report on High Oil Prices - "Speculation My A$$"
Nate Hagens
The Oil Drum July 23, 2008
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4334

About this article:

Expand
Want to share your opinion on this article? Add a comment.
Disagree with this article? .
To report a factual error in this article, click here