Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Taking Taleb's Tail Risk Hedging Advice

Jul. 13, 2020 2:40 PM ETSPDR® S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)
David Pinsen profile picture
David Pinsen's Blog
Please Note: Blog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors.


  • Nassim Taleb says it's time to hedge tail risk.
  • Here are two ways of doing that.
  • One of them offers the possibility of strong returns even if the market doesn't decline significantly.

Taleb Says It's Time To Hedge Tail Risk

A few years ago, Nassim Taleb and I followed each other on Twitter, and he was even kind enough to offer his respects on my deadlift PR.

Since then, like presumably hundreds of his other former correspondents, I have been blocked by Taleb. Fortunately, I have ValueWalk to keep me apprised of Taleb's pronouncements. 

In a recent post, Michelle Jones noted that Taleb had warned that tail risk hedges were a necessity in the current market. Here's a simple way to add a tail risk hedge to your portfolio. I'll use a $500,000 portfolio in this example, but the same approach would work for a $50,000 or $5,000,000 portfolio. 

Adding A Tail Risk Hedge To A $500,000 Portfolio

Here's a simple way of protecting a stock portfolio against market risk using optimal, or least expensive, puts on SPY. For the purposes of this example, I'll assume your portfolio is closely correlated with SPY, that you have enough diversification within it to protect against stock-specific risk, and that you can tolerate a decline of up to 20% over the next few months (if you have a smaller risk tolerance, you can use the same approach entering a smaller decline threshold; similarly, if you have a larger or smaller portfolio, you can adjust Step 1 accordingly).

Step 1

Divide $500,000 by the current price of SPY, which was $317.59 as of Friday's close, to get 1,574 (rounded).

Step 2

Scan for the optimal, or least expensive, puts to protect against a >20% decline in 1,574 shares of SPY over your desired time frame. Here, I've used Portfolio Armor's default setting, which is to scan for optimal hedges expiring in approximately six months.

Note the cost here: $19,455, or 3.89% of portfolio value, which was calculated conservatively, using the ask price of the puts (in practice, you can often buy options at some price between the bid and ask prices). That worked out to an annualized cost as a percentage of portfolio value of 7.6%.

Step 3

Round up the number of SPY shares to the nearest 100 and repeat step 2.

Note that, in this case, it was cheaper to hedge rounding up to the nearest round lot: The cost was $15,536, calculated conservatively again, at the ask. That's about 3.12% of a $500,000 portfolio, or 6.13% annualized.

Wrapping Up: A Drawback Of This Approach

Recall that in the second, less expensive, example, the annualized cost is 6.13%. A drawback of this approach is that this cost will act as a drag on your portfolio's returns if the market keeps going up. If your portfolio is closely correlated with SPY, you can expect to lag it by approximately 6.13% over the next 12 months, assuming the market goes up over that time frame, you add new hedges of similar time to expiration just before these expire, and the cost is similar to what you paid here.

An Alternate Approach

An approach to hedging that offers a chance of beating the market if it goes up, or only declines a little bit is the hedged portfolio method. In that approach, you buy and hedge a handful of names that have a shot at market-beating returns and are also inexpensive to hedge. Below is the performance of the most recent portfolio hedged against a >20% decline to finish its 6-month lifespan. 

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.