Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Rob McEwen On Goldcorp's Hostile Bid, M&A Opportunity And Market Bottoms MUX, TNR.v, GLD, GDX

Sufiy profile picture
Sufiy's Blog
Please Note: Blog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors.

Deep Value, Commodities, Gold

Seeking Alpha Analyst Since 2006

Sufiy is a Seeking Alpha contributor.

User Actions

Rob McEwen‏@McEwenMining

Drilling at Grass Valley, southwest of Barrick's Cortez Mine in Nevada, started this week! #MUX #Nevada #drilling pic.twitter.com/WqztoHzpx5

With general equity markets sliding into the territory which will challenge Bernanke's Happy Exit with Tapering, time is to listen to those who have seen and have done it. Rob McEwen is dissecting the recent market situation in Gold and M&A activity, which will make the best stories in the market to move very fast from the bottom. McEwen Mining has bottomed at $1.65 in December and has closed at $2.63 last Friday. Los Azules Copper project will be the one of the coming M&A stories this year, which will move valuations of McEwen Mining and TNR Gold. TNR Gold holds shares of McEwen Mining after the settlement on Los Azules. Rob McEwen has announced on Twitter about the commencement of drilling in Nevada now. With Gold crossing $1270 and closing just below it we have a very exciting time for the best stories in junior mining these days.


McEwen Mining Receives Final Environmental Permit for Construction and Operation of El Gallo 2 Project MUX, TNR.v, GDX

"Rob McEwen is on track with development of El Galo 2 and now, after the last main permit has been granted by Mexican authorities, the only question remains where the capital will come from. McEwen Mining had a very impressive run from December $1.65 low to the recent highs of $2.63. Los Azules Copper development remains the major catalyst for McEwen Mining in case of sale of this asset and it will make development of the existing pipeline of project feasible and further acquisitions will bring the dreams about S&P 500 back."


McEwen Mining And TNR Gold: China Lights the Way for Copper MUX, TNR.v, GDX, CU

"Nobody loves miners any more - it could be the very good time to accumulate the best stories in the market place. And now it looks like that December was a really good time for it. Still under the radar screens of the mainstream investors best junior miners are turning around from historical oversold levels. Last week CITI went bullish on miners for the first time in three years, so the story will be getting out and new money will be coming into the sector now.

McEwen Mining has been breaking out with the very impressive run from retesting lows of 2013 at just above $1.65 level in mid December to this last Friday close of $2.49 on Volume of 5 million shares. TNR Gold is getting its bids as well now and closed at CAD0.055 last week. Los Azules copper is the key to valuation catalyst for both companies now. TNR Gold holds shares of McEwen Mining after the settlement on Los Azules. TNR Gold is selling its Back-In right with PI Financial engaged and Rob McEwen was relying on Los Azules sale to finance its ambitious expansion plans.

In the recent interview Rob has discussed Argentina situation, which is changing for the better now. Nothing is easy in these markets, but any developments with Los Azules will be the game changer for McEwen Mining and TNR Gold. Rob is talking about potential acquisitions for McEwen Mining, ongoing drilling in Nevada in Q1 and his conversation with "person from the ground in China." Not a lot of people are expecting it, but 5 dollar Copper could be in the cards, according to that source. Needless to say that it will make very happy shareholders of McEwen Mining and TNR Gold and Rob is still standing by his $5,000 price for Gold.

Recent impressive rally in McEwen Mining was fired by the huge short position of over 30 million shares as of December 2013 and should Gold continue its run to the upside shorts will be very nervous. The WSJ article is providing some confirmation of the potential change in the trend for Copper as well."

Rob McEwen Interview.


McEwen Mining And TNR Gold: Report - Argentina Is In The Mood For Change On Investment Policy TNR.v, MUX, LCC.v, SSRI, PAA

"Argentina mining landscape is changing for the better according to the report by BN Americas. Lumina Copper is trading above CAD 6.00, McEwen Mining is breaking out to the upside and TNR Gold has found some bids as well recently."


Los Azules Copper - McEwen Mining And TNR Gold: Yamana Gold to invest $450 million in Argentine mine MUX, TNR.v, LCC.v

"It looks like the shift in Argentina for the better is happening for real this time. Rob McEwen has discussed it in his recent presentation and that in his opinion "we have seen the low in Argentina after a lot of disappointment". Shevron special Shale Oil deal, repayment to Repsol and now Yamana Gold investment are certainly the things we would like to see now after elections. Lumina copper is holding above CAD5.00 these days and McEwen Mining and TNR Gold should benefit from Los Azules copper revised valuation now."



INTERVIEW: McEwen on Goldcorp's hostile bid, M&A opportunity and market bottoms

Rob McEwen sees a market bottom forming and speaks about not missing it, among other matters.

Author: Kip Keen
Posted: Thursday , 23 Jan 2014


Last Friday Mineweb's Kip Keen spoke with Rob McEwen the chief owner of McEwen Mining. In a wide-ranging interview, McEwen weighs in on the impact of Goldcorp's hostile bid for Osisko on the mining sector, growth through M&A at McEwen mining, assessment of junior companies and market bottoms. And not missing them.

Kip Keen: The Goldcorp takeover bid for Osisko has generated a lot of excitement. What are your thoughts on it?

Rob McEwen: The takeover in general is a symptom or an illustration of the consolidation that's been happening in the industry. And I think it will pick up pace as we move into this year. It's showing to investors that you can make money in this market; that it's been overlooked with people thinking there's no opportunity here. I think the biggest risk to investors is missing the run we're going to have in these stocks.

KK: Do you think it's fair to say that management teams and shareholders are more willing to accept M&A now after the long, tough couple of years we've had?

RM: The question of M&A growth - it's been painful for a lot of the majors and intermediates. They've diluted their shareholders. They were moving on a growth-for-growth-sake basis.

I think there'll be more discretion for a while, looking at growth on a per share basis. And I don't see the seniors being very active. Most of them have had their CEOs replaced. Their marching orders are, open up the margins by getting the costs down, defer major capital projects and finish those projects that are still outstanding. So they won't be big players in the space. It will to be the intermediates and maybe some of the juniors.

KK: In other words, some of the intermediates and larger juniors in a strong share position are saying, 'Look we can grab that nice deposit for less than 10 percent dilution in our shares and that's worth it.' But otherwise not a whole lot of activity.

RM: Right.

KK: You're projecting about 140,000 ounces gold-equivalent this year and 170,000 ounces AuEq next year in production at McEwen Mining. I was curious, are you keen to grow McEwen through M&A? Or is the focus squarely on organic growth?

RM: No, in order to achieve our goals we're going to have to take on some M&A. The ideal M&A is where you have a significant impact in production, a reduction in operating cost and a project that is in a stiuation that is adding to our cash flow that would allow us to build our El Gallo II project. Because right now we're looking at it and saying at current metal prices the IRR on El Gallo II is not attractive.

If you take the stance that the price of metals are going up, then you want to be in a position to profit from that. But for us at the moment to go out and think of financing either some combination of debt and equity or possibly an asset sale, it's just not on the table because the cost is too expensive and the return is too small.

KK: Are you seeing out there achievable opportunities in terms of picking up arguably a better project at current prices given the way the market has been. I mean you mentioned not missing the run up that might happen. Are you of the same mind in terms of McEwen?

RM: Well if we saw something that would increase the value of our shares, we want to do that. I'm not looking for size for the sake of size. I own 25 percent of the company. My cost base is C$125 million. I don't take a salary. The only way I'm going to make money is the same way my shareholders do, which is through a higher shareprice.

We've got most of our permits in Mexico for our El Gallo II project, which we hope to get before the end of the month. We're starting to drill on two projects in Nevada in the first quarter. We've got a couple targets we like. We continue to drill in Mexico. There's some organic growth there as well.

We're part way through our El Gallo I expansion in Mexico and that should be completed by the end of the first quarter. Then we move into a higher-grade part of the orebody as we go deeper. So we did just under 140,000 (AuEq) last year, which was a 33 percent increase over the year before. We'll probably be relatively flat this year.

And then going to about 175,000 next year based on the expansion of El Gallo I. We hope to have a permit on our Gold Bar property in Nevada in the first quarter of 2015. And that project we could manage to finance it with very little additional funding and dilution. So once that's completed, that would take us over 225,000 ounces AuEq. And if the metal prices improved we'd look at El Gallo II which would take us over 300,000 ounces. So we've got a good growth curve. And as our production goes up, our costs are coming down.

KK: You mentioned Mexico. A new Mexico mining tax just came in. What's your sense of the impact of the added tax on mining in Mexico?

RM: For Mexico I think it's unfortunate. Not just for the mining industry. It does start pulling the welcome mat away.

When you look at most of the politicians in the world they behave in a similar manner. Their legislation is based on looking in the rear view mirror. They have vivid memories of the gold price two years ago being $1,900 an ounce and feeling that the foreign companies that have come in are getting too big a share of what was there.

So they put in taxes in an environment where they're not appreciating what is happening now. They're dealing with the past and not recognizing that the capital markets are non existant for precious metals and that prices are way down so margins are skinny. And no ones making much money. And in order to attract capital you need an inviting environment.

I think it was a poor move on their part.

KK: Would it factor into your search for assets in terms of where they are?

RM: Oh yes. I mean you're going to look around the world and you're going to say that if you see something like: Is it in a part of the world you want to work in?

In our case it's through the Americas. And you go, where do you think the best place to maximize the return on investment for your shareholders?

Some of these moves seem to have come out of the blue. But if one takes in economic history and the mining cycles there comes a point where the politicians say 'We need more of that.' No one wanted to go there (Mexico) a while ago without big incentives.

KK: I want to speak about your own investments in explorers. I know you make a fair number of investments in junior explorers. I'm curious, what do you look for? How do you assess companies?

RM: I like grade. The higher the grade the more attractive the project is to me. I like projects that don't need enormous capital. I look for projects where management hasn't sold royaties or has an inclination to sell them because they're taking away, in my mind, the profit of the industry. Particularly in this lower price environment there's very little margin and free cash flow generated as a result of people sellling royalties and metals streaming. People say, 'It's the only money around or I'll have to dilute.'

Well, they're not looking to the future. They're giving away a large part of the value of the company and that's very clearly illustrated when you look at the performance of the royalty and streaming companies relative to the producers. There's a big gap. And the industry created that gab by selling the royalties and metals streams. So I avoid a company that does that. I want to hear management doesn't want to do that and I want to see it in writing.

KK: You seem pretty keen on some of the venerable Canadian gold jurisdictions.

RM: People didn't run out of money two years ago. They started running out of money last year and this year. And they were exploring and people were putting out good results. But they weren't getting any traction in the market. I look to August last year and the gold rally we had there. And I believe that's illustrative of what type of explosive move we can see in this sector when investors turn positive on it. So you saw 25 to 75 percent moves in companies in one month.

KK: There's a lot more talk these days about opportunities in the sector. Do you get a sense that the skies are clearing somewhat?

RM: I'd say we're either at or extremely close to the bottom and as an investor I'm not prepared to wait to see if the bottom's there because it's very hard to pick it. Because, as we talked about the performance last August, if you you're not taking advantage of it right now, you're going to miss a big part of the move. And when you look at the distance these stocks have to travel to get to their old highs, there's some wonderful numbers in terms of performance that I think we're going to see.

Please Note our Legal Disclaimer on the Blog, including, but Not limited to:

There are NO Qualified Persons among the authors of this blog as it is defined by NI 43-101, we were NOT able to verify and check any provided information in the articles, news releases or on the links embedded on this blog; you must NOT rely in any sense on any of this information in order to make any resource or value calculation, or attribute any particular value or Price Target to any discussed securities.

We Do Not own any content in the third parties' articles, news releases, videos or on the links embedded on this blog; any opinions - including, but not limited to the resource estimations, valuations, target prices and particular recommendations on any securities expressed there - are subject to the disclosure provided by those third parties and are NOT verified, approved or endorsed by the authors of this blog in any way.

Please, do not forget, that we own stocks we are writing about and have position in these companies. We are not providing any investment advice on this blog and there is no solicitation to buy or sell any particular company.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.