Dillard’s (DDS) Short Interest %: Choose Your Own Adventure

Summary
- There are many estimates of DDS’s short interest as a % of float (SI %) floating on the internet.
- SI % in the ~30% range fails to account for shares held in the retirement fund. Accounting for those pushes SI % to 60%.
- The more adventurous can make additional adjustments (e.g. exclude benchmark-oriented funds from float) that see SI % near the 90% and beyond levels.
Some sites show 31%, others are closer to the 80% range, and some are above 90%.
What the heck is DDS’s short interest as a % of float?
I’ll give you an economist’s answer: it depends. It depends on what you choose to exclude from the float. Choose your own adventure.
You won’t find fancy math, here, today. Just counting. Some call it lowbrow math.
First, the easy stuff out of the way: official short interest figures are published twice a month. The latest data was released on January 27th. It showed that short interest in DDS stood at 4.02MM as of January 15th.
There are third-party services (S3 and Ortex) that offer estimates of daily short-interest. But I’ll stick to the official figure, even if it’s a little dated (the next update should be released on February 9).
Now we can begin counting shares.
Some housekeeping for the uninitiated: Dillard’s has two classes of shares, a class A and a class B. Only the class A trades (~18MM shares). The total is share count is ~22MM (class B has 4MM shares, which we can disregard for this exercise). From now on, “shares” refer to class A shares.
Next, we count shares held by insiders (employees and directors). Below is the list:
Shares |
As of |
Description |
|
1,007,692 |
1/4/2021 |
President |
|
William Dillard II (after gifting) |
927,313 153,170 |
1/4/2021 12/17/2020 |
CEO, Chairman Assuming out of float |
488,273 |
1/4/2021 |
Executive Vice President |
|
Drue Matheny (after gifting) |
407,333 40,000 |
1/4/2021 12/28/2020 |
Executive Vice President Assuming out of float |
James Freeman (after gifting) |
149,064 2,300 |
5/16/2020 12/17/2020 |
Director Assuming out of float |
133,124 |
1/4/2021 |
Senior Vice President |
|
121,536 |
5/16/2020 |
Director’s fund |
|
75,000 |
5/16/2020 |
Director |
|
58,302 |
5/16/2020 |
Director |
|
41,496 |
3/19/2020 |
Insider-owned company |
|
37,743 |
1/4/2021 |
Vice President |
|
36,339 |
1/4/2021 |
Vice President |
|
33,697 |
1/4/2021 |
Vice President |
|
32,062 |
1/4/2021 |
Senior Vice President |
|
Stephen Warren (held in trust) |
31,032 |
5/16/2020 |
Director |
28,560 |
1/4/2021 |
Vice President |
|
28,272 |
5/16/2020 |
Director |
|
19,600 |
5/16/2020 |
Director |
|
18,312 |
5/16/2020 |
Director |
|
12,600 |
12/15/2020 |
Director |
|
9,409 |
1/4/2021 |
Senior Vice President |
|
8,477 |
1/4/2021 |
Senior Vice President |
|
5,305 |
1/4/2021 |
General Counsel |
|
3,225 |
1/4/2021 |
Vice President |
|
3,195 |
1/4/2021 |
Corporate VP Stores |
|
2,640 |
11/3/2020 |
Vice President |
|
1,815 |
1/4/2021 |
Vice President |
|
Shares directly held by insiders excluding retirement fund |
3,917,156 |
Excluding those 3.92MM shares from the original share count yields a float of 14.07MM – that’s a short interest % of 29%.
But, as many who are familiar with Dillard’s will be quick to point out, that float does not adjust for the 7.42MM shares held by Newport Trust, the company’s retirement fund manager. Excluding those shares reduces the float from 14.07MM to 6.65MM and increases short interest % by 31%, yielding 60%.
Many who source their data algorithmically will fail to account for Newport Trust because on the surface it looks like any other fund manager – it files a 13F and all. Now, I think a definition of float that does not exclude Newport is incomplete, but that’s me. This is choose your own adventure, after all.
This is probably a good stopping point if you want to stick to the conservative definition of float. It’s easy to forget, with all the talk of SI % above 100% lately, that 60% is quite high already!
But, because there are higher estimates floating on the internet, we can entertain what they may be doing. I am guessing higher estimates are probably making one or more of the following adjustments:
- Excluding, from the float, shares held by benchmark-oriented funds like Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA).
- Excluding, from the float, Ted’s stake of 5%, revealed in an early October 2020 filing.
- Adding an estimate of shares repurchased after 11/28 (the latest 10-Q).
To be clear, assuming that Ted or ETF-like funds are unlikely sellers in a squeeze is speculative at best. We have no reason to believe that they won’t. And, though it would be consistent with historic trends, we don’t know how aggressively Dillard’s continued repurchasing shares after filing the 10-Q.
That said, it’s the weekend and I am a little bored, cooped up at home. So, here’s the math.
Shares |
As of |
SI % |
My opinion |
|
17,987,659 |
11/28/2020 |
|||
Less: insider |
3,917,156 |
See table above |
||
= Float |
14,070,503 |
29% |
incomplete |
|
7,420,197 |
9/30/2020 |
|||
= Float |
6,650,306 |
60% |
conservative |
|
Less: DFA (benchmark-oriented)* |
1,545,139 |
11/30/2020 |
||
= Float |
5,105,167 |
79% |
Speculative |
|
Less: Ted Weschler |
1,081,000 |
|||
= Float |
4,024,167 |
100% |
||
Less: a guess of shares repurchased in Q4 |
600,000 |
|||
= Float |
3,424,167 |
117% |
*Using shares disclosed in DFA’s mutual funds (DFSVX, DFSTX, DFTSX, DFEOX, DFQTX, DFTCX, DTMEX, DFFVX, DFTVX, DFTPX, DTMVX, 233203710) as of November, 30th
Looking at this table, do I think that Dillard’s is susceptible to a squeeze? Yes. But, a word of caution: short-sellers may (and have been, so far – evidenced by the falling short interest) cover in an orderly fashion.
Now you can mix and match the shares you want to include in your definition of float. Mine, if I were pressed, would probably exclude DFA’s stake from the float and account for some repurchase adjustment, but include Ted’s stake (which would come out to a float of ~4.5MM and an 89% SI %).
What does your definition of float look like?
Analyst's Disclosure: I am/we are long DDS.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.