Macro and Micro, Value and Growth, Long/Short Equity, Income (DGI, Bonds, Pref.'s)
Seeking Alpha Analyst Since 2014
On a strictly formal note...
The Fortune Teller ("TFT") is a well-known contributor on Seeking Alpha ("SA"), and a top blogger according to TipRanks, with over 30 years of deep and direct market experience.
TFT is the leading moderator of two services on SA: Wheel of Fortune and Macro Trading Factory (led by TFT's "mirage identity" called The Macro Teller, or "TMT")
TFT is an account that represents a business which is mostly focuses on portfolio- and asset- management. The business is run by two principles that (among the two of them) hold BAs in Accounting & Economics, and Compute Sciences, as well as MBAs. One of the two is also a licensed CPA (although many years have gone by since he was practicing), and has/had been a licensed investment adviser in various countries, including the US (Series 7 & 66).
On a combined basis, the two principles lived and worked for at least three years in three other-different countries/continents, holding senior-managerial positions across various industries/activities:
On one hand/principal, IT, R&D, Cloud, AI/ML, Security/Fraud, Scalability, Enterprise Software, Agile Methodologies, and Mobile Applications.
On the other hand/principal, Accounting, Banking, Wealth Management, Portfolio Management and Fund Management.
Currently, they run a business which is mainly focusing on active portfolio/fund/asset management as well as providing consulting/advisory services. The business, co-founded in 2011, is also occasionally getting involved in real estate and early-stage (start-up) investments.
The people who work in and for this business are an integral and essential part of the services that we offer on SA Marketplace platform: Wheel of Fortune, and Market Trading Factory. While TFT (or TMT for that matter) is the single "face" behind these services, it's important for readers/subscribers to know that what they get is not a "one-man-show" rather the end-result of an ongoing, relentless, team effort.
We strongly believe that successful investors must have/perform Discipline, Patience, and Consistency (or "DCP"). We adhere to those rigorously.
The contributor RoseNose is both a contributing and promoting author for Macro Trading Factory.
On a more personal note...
We're advising and consulting to private individuals, mostly (U)HNWI that we had been serving through many years of working within the private banking, wealth management and asset management arenas. This activity focuses on the long run and it's mostly based on a Buy & Hold strategy.
Risk management is part of our DNA and while we normally take LONG-naked positions, we play defense too, by occasionally hedging our positions, in order to protect the downside.
We cover all asset-classes by mostly focusing on cash cows and high dividend paying "machines" that may generate high (total) returns: Interest-sensitive, income-generating, instruments, e.g. Bonds, REITs, BDCs, Preferred Shares, MLPs, etc. combined with a variety of high-risk, growth and value stocks.
We believe in, and invest for, the long run but we're very minded of the short run too. While it's possible to make a massive-quick "kill", here and there, good things usually come in small packages (and over time); so do returns. Therefore, we (hope but) don't expect our investments to double in value over a short period of time. We do, however, aim at outperforming the S&P 500, on a risk adjusted basis, and to deliver positive returns on an absolute basis, i.e. regardless of markets' returns and directions.
Note: "Aim" doesn't equate guarantee!!! We can't, and never will, promise a positive return!!! Everything that we do is on a "best effort" basis, without any assurance that the actual results would meet our good intentions.
Timing is Everything! While investors can't time the market, we believe that this applies only to the long term. In the short-term (a couple of months) one can and should pick the right moment and the right entry point, based on his subjective-personal preferences, risk aversion and goals. Long-term, strategy/macro, investment decisions can't be timed while short-term, implementation/micro, investment decision, can!
When it comes to investments and trading we believe that the most important virtues are healthy common sense, general wisdom, sufficient research, vast experience, strive for excellence, ongoing willingness to learn, minimum ego, maximum patience, ability to withstand (enormous) pressure/s, strict discipline and a lot of luck!...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is a continuation of the First Part that got published yesterday.
Risk Rating: 3 >>> Maximum* Allocation: 5%
*Doesn't equate suggested!
A bit risky, but under the circumstances - not too risky!
Just like our option-trades involving MIK, NKLA, or BA - the best three trades our service suggested in 2020! - we believe that this has a good chance to make it into the 2021 list, even if it's very early in the days.
Nothing is guaranteed, of course, and you must understand the risk before executing, but this is the type of trades that allow for big gains to be made, with relatively small/er losses to suffer if things go wrong.
This is a SHORT STRADDLE on Brookfield Property Partners LP (BPY) long position.
As we've explained yesterday, the most likely outcome is that Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) would keep the tender offer at $16.50, or slightly higher, but no more than $18.15 (or $18.975 at a very extreme case).
On the other hand, even without the tender offer, we find it hard to see BPY falling below $14. After all, the stock traded between $14 to $16.93 (Nov. 18, 2020) over the past two months, without any tender offer circling around.
This trade would make maximum money of at (or close to) the expiry date (June 18, 2020) BPY trades at $17.00. At that exact price, both options expire worthless, and we get to keep the $2 (combined) premium in our pocket, with no cut whatsoever.
At $16.50 (where the current tender offer is), we lose $0.50 on the PUT, but end up with a net gain of $1.50. That would be a 300% ($2 sale / $0.50 buy).
The breakeven points are $19 and $15, $2 to the upside or downside, respectively. If BPY trades (at or towards expiry date) above $19 or below $15 - we start losing money on a net basis.
Technically, since there's no ceiling to how much the stock price can go up - the loss is unlimited. If you wish to reduce the margin requirement on selling this naked CALL, you can BUY a higher strike CALL. For example: $20 3/19/2021 for only $0.05 (perhaps less) - the price it closed yesterday at.
Why buying a shorter-dated protective CALL (3/19/2021) and not the same date as the expiry date of the CALL we just sold? Because until 3/19/2021 it's likely that we know the fate of the tender offer, so there's no need to protect beyond that (in advance).
Remember: As option sellers, long/er-dated expiry dates are welcome, whereas as option buyers, short/er-dated expiry dates are better.
Risk Rating: 2.5-3 >>> Maximum* Allocation: 5%-6%
*Doesn't equate suggested!
Another way to play the exact same trade, but in an even safer (though less profitable) way would be a SHORT STRANGLE (instead of STRADDLE)
The only difference is that now the margin of safety is wider.
STRANGLE | STRADDLE | |
High breakeven point (net basis) | $19.50 | $19.00 |
Low breakeven point (net basis) | $14.50 | $15.00 |
Maximum Profit (i.e. combined premiums) | $1.50 | $2.00 |
Maximum Profit point/range | $16.00-$18.00 | $17.00 sharp |
Hedging/Capping (Buying a $20 March CALL)* | $0.05 | $0.05 |
*Optional, not a must
As you can see, the trades are practically identical conceptually, but they offer a slightly different risk/reward profile.
Due to the higher safety that this (second) trade offers, we assign a bit lower risk rating to it. Other than this, both are equally good to go.
Risk Rating: 1.5 >>> Maximum* Allocation: 8%
*Doesn't equate suggested!
!!! Very important !!!:
The ratio isn't 'holy'; we've managed to trade this pair between 0.695x to 0.705x, so don't treat the 0.700x as a limit you can't deviate from. The opportunity is big enough to justify 0.71x, 0.72x, and even 0.75x...
Note this is one of the lowest-ever risk rating we've ever assigned to a trade, reflecting our belief that the situation here is so extreme that we simply don't see how one can lose money here.
Having said that, this was true ever since Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC), a C-corp for tax purposes, has started to trade alongside the older-standing Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP), which is a partnership.
Yet, as you can see, the BIP/BIPC keeps sliding (please don't ask us why!; we can't explain this...) and it's now trading as low as 0.7000x!!!
The two companies, just like their sibling pair - Partnership's Brookfield Property Partners LP (BPY) & C-corp's Brookfield Property REIT Inc (BPYU) - are (supposed to be) economically (nearly) identical. As such, and in-spite of some minor legal and underlying holding related differences, they suppose to trade at roughly the same market price.
After all, even the distributions of the two entities are, unsurprisingly, identical!
We've already played this very same idea with BPY/BPYU on 3/30/2020 and on 4/01/2020, as well as with BPY/BPR (BPR was the symbol before it has changed to BPYU) on 12/26/2019.
if you're unfamiliar with the logic, method, and/or risk associated with such a trade - please make sure you read these past articles before executing it!
Why are we jumping into these waters right now?
1) The opportunity/gap has never been greater. If the pair ever 'wishes' to close the gap, we're looking at a 43% upside to a 1.0000x ratio.
2) It looks as it BIP has had enough of this unreal lagging... Technically speaking, we might start seeing a reversal.
3) Although BPY/BPYU (or BPY/BPR) has never reached such extreme levels as do BIP/BIPC, we know the drill. Furthermore, with BAM now trying to take BPY and BPYU off the market, it's only natural for these two entities to trade at roughly the same market prices. Indeed, the BPY/BPYU ratio has jumped yesterday (following the announcement of the tender offer) from ~0.96x to ~1.00
What if BAM decides to take BIP and BIPC off the market too?... Even if a tender offer may not be identical for the tow companies (as it is for BPY and BPYU) - although we don't see a reason why it wouldn't be - the gap is so big that surely BIP would have to gain more than BIPC!
Once again, it may not be wise to make a complete and full comparison between the two pairs. However, the message we're trying to deliver here is about the concept (which is identical) and the opportunity (even if it's not identical).
Last but not least, we're happy shareholders of BIP (and BPY) and this trade has nothing to do with this (these) long position/s. It's a separate trade, done on a stand-alone basis, for its own (very compelling) merits.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gain access to our entire "2021 Game Plan" series:
Yesterday and earlier today, we've published our proposed allocations (to asset-classes, sectors, and industries) and detailed explanations, based on the investment themes we are in favor of for the coming year.
Since this last piece is so long, we're breaking it into three parts.
Until the very last part gets published, surely inside this week, we keep the 25% discount (for the first year) ON.
All you need to do is 1) subscribe, 2) grab a popcorn, and 3) 'watch' this series, live, from the best seat in the theatre.
Social distancing and a (COVID) friendly environment are guaranteed!
From all of us who are riding and spinning the Wheel.
*For the 1st year of subscription
Follow us on Twitter @TheFortuneTell5