The following is a 'post script' (in it's entirity) I've made just now as an 'add-on' to my previous instapost here on Seeking Alpha.
Readers of this instapost can make up their own mind, as to what is going on here.
SHAME Looksmart! SHAME on you all!!
ps; Yahoo have now stopped my posting (again) to the LOOK board! - I have broken a link back to here and 'spread' key-words, but still can't answer a post made to me (below), from another poster. I tried to post to him on the Ballard Power Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:BLDP) board, but had no success. (Here it is Yoda494, for what ever it is worth, to you.)
CENSORSHIP is VILE!!! - What a 'sad' world we have made it!! :(
Re: Anyone with a take on today's news? - Chrissuggs1
CENSORSHIP? - Here's testimony to well over 3 years of an ongoing battle with Yahoo!, for "freedom of thought" or, "expression".
|Re: Baxi Innotech - Yoda494 0 second(s) ago|
| Sorry - Had to post a reply to you here. Yahoo monitors will not permit me to post! |
That's a better reply from you, Yoda494.
Much better than from within a previous, when you had accused me of plenty and even said that ... "I can say that anything spewed out of yours is a huge pile of SHT."
We are now progressing as shareholders, albeit 'slowly'. - (Shareholders who generally have been pre-conditioned by a 'divide and conquer' mentality in our society- and a tactic that's been a winner for them, over a number of years now.)
To put it simple, I just happen to be one of those long suffering shareholders you talk of in your post.
Disclosure from Looksmart?
Let me assure you that everything they have done (on the surface - can be argued successfully by the Co), has almost been disclosed at least 'once'. (In filings, etc)
If you accept that the AdCenter platform and marketplace IS what I claim it to be (following some 10 yrs of solid research on the subject), you will also grant that it has cost many millions of development dollars in the building of it.
Micro soft (I maintain), is (and has been) recovering its own share of the 'development' costs through the likes of Ap pNexus and a number of other (many) private Co "users", of the platform. AS K has done like-wise but more directly, over the past few years. Channels (and certain global marketplaces - Canada, the UK and Australia, for starters) can be clearly shown to have 'mysteriously' come and gone from Looksmart's revenue declarations - and this has all been disclosed in Looksmart's quarterly filings, for all to see. (No questions asked, of course)
I have been posting here for many years and for at least three to four of them, near on all of those posts I've made, were deleted. Why? For my simply telling it as I feel it is or, 'asking the question', that's why.
hXXp://seek ingalphaDOTcom/user/36191/instablog/search?terms=CENS OR SHIP
The main reason for the 'squeaky squirrels' (or, the no 'beating of the drum' re; Looksmart's own involvement - surrounding the OPEN marketplace) has mainly been centered around the 650 odd global ad networks that 'sprung-up' over the past number of years. (The slow accumulation of shares in the Co, is an obvious other.)
Many of the ad networks have been just early-day 'foot-sloggers' and have been virtually "used" by the likes of Microsoft and News corp et al, to go out and evangelize the "message" of 'change' in how digital media was to be 'bought and sold', on and off the web. - Not knowing that many of them would be made 'obsolete' in such a short period of time. - Where advertisers would then quickly gravitate to the more efficient (fully automated) BIG BOY players, as can be witnessed today with the Medi aBrand's acquisition notification. (I beg all to read of it! To understand that little more.)
Looksmart will be 'showing the bacon' soon, is my reckoning. - And with what I feel lies ahead, will get to prove to be one of THE biggest 'turn-around' stories in the history of the markets. Wait and see.
Thanks for your reply.
ps; Incidentally - Yahoo are clearly 'filtering' this board possibly with a ban on certain 'key-words' that may be applied to the filter system. - - Where-by I have had to 'break' them, so as to be able to post this message in reply to you.