Under The Jurisdiction Of The Roman Curia? I Don't Think So.

Aug. 16, 2014 6:24 AM ET1 Comment
Please Note: Blog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors.

Contributor Since 2006

Longstanding investor in Looksmart (and a 70 yr old ex-tradesman), who has a passionate interest in the problems of newspapers along with their success in all their monetisation attempts made, on the web. For the "times are indeed, a changin", I feel. [17th of Aug, 2011 - Print media (sadly), has lost a sense of that preponderance it once held in our society. There is hope. - But it needs a fundamental change in that ingrained culture that has been the way, of the past. Please read the article linked below (and especially all the 'free' user comment), that has also been added today.] And, history will soon show that ACAP (the, Automated Content Access Protocol), that I have been so "passionate" about in many a post made everywhere over the past few years, will not only become a part of our every-day lives, but will be fiercely-enforced along the way...And rightly so... Where your "free" (Local) "rag", may well even survive and become (as was also predicted by myself back in 2005). the very "lynch pin" between local business and the web! :) And it seems that Europe will lead the way....It's a lengthy read, that some will find is well worth-while to do so. "Publishers demand IP Rights To Protect Journalism" Cheers!! Added August 16th, 2011 - "Newspapers Need a DNA Transplant" http://www.editorandpublisher.com/Newsletter/Article/Newspapers-Need-a-DNA-Transplant March 6th, 2012 - "Newspapers: It’s not a revenue problem, it’s a culture problem" http://gigaom.com/2012/03/05/newspapers-its-not-a-revenue-problem-its-a-culture-problem/ “Publishers need to think how that [their] brand lives on the Web" - http://www.digiday.com/publishing/in-turnabout-publishers-act-like-marketers/ Rupert Murdoch: The future of newspapers is all digital http://dlvr.it/1V8dPY New Orleans, newspapers and the beginning of the end By Mathew Ingram May. 25, 2012 http://gigaom.com/2012/05/25/new-orleans-newspapers-and-the-beginning-of-the-end/ Friday Sep 21, 2012, 11:22pm EDT LOOK: $0.89 Up 0.08 (+10.53%) 4:00PM EDT|After Hours : 0.89 Up 0.00 (0.03%) 4:09PM EDT Two excellent articles I've just read (I feel) encapsulate this lon 'drawn out' road to come up with a solution that becomes, the 'intersection of search and display'. Read on.... "Do you hear that rumble in the distance? It’s change coming. What sort of change, you ask? Well, the events of the last few weeks collectively point to a pretty big shift in the search landscape. First, has traditional search engine usage reached its peak? When people skip over a search engine and go straight to Amazon for product search, it’s clear that either Amazon is doing something very right, or search engines need to improve their results. Changes to Google Shopping may help improve the experience for users, but is it too little too late?" http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/183511/the-future-of-search.html Then.... "Google News, its executives tell me, now "algorithmically harvests" articles from more than 50,000 news sources across 72 editions and 30 languages. And Google News-powered results, Google says, are viewed by about 1 billion unique users a week. (Yep, that's billion with a b.) Which translates, for news outlets overall, to more than 4 billion clicks each month: 1 billion from Google News itself and an additional 3 billion from web search. As a Google representative put it, "That's about 100,000 business opportunities we provide publishers every minute." http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/09/google-news-at-10-how-the-algorithm-won-over-the-news-industry/262641/ It's been an amazing story all the way. With LUMA Partners publishing it's LUMAscapes that map over 1,500 companies across seven sub-sectors of digital:companies saying, that within the circles alone [they] represent approximately $3 trillion of market capitalization and $450 billion of cash and securities. - http://www.lumapartners.com/the-strategic-buyer-lumascape/ Where do they start to rein-in some of that invested capital? My thoughts are contained in the following two links: https://www.facebook.com/ross.bradley.18/posts/10151231209526605 http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/36191-lookingconfident/932031-an-rtb-global-open-marketplace-handling-up-to-100-billion-events-per-day?source=kizur#comment_update_link

From within an interesting Facebook thread and in commenting on the video below, I made a statement, that: There is what I feel is a 'major' mistake made (in the 1st 4 minutes of the video), and I'm wondering if any member can tell me what I feel that 'mistake' made, is? Facebook Thread: tiny.cc/c6fokx

Martin Sørensen asks: "I'm getting very curious as to what is the major mistake made in the video."

Well Martin... This is my 2nd attempt. My 1st on FB simply 'vanished' when my computer shut down mysteriously.

The video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ok8Wyzse4

Ok, it is at the 3.00 minute mark, is where it begins.

4) 'THE CITY OF DETROIT' is a device created by the Trustees and the Administrators, Guardians operating under the jurisdiction of the Roman Curia - who have tricked the people into 'pledging' their property to be used as collateral, which has fraudulently converted the true Creditors into debtors reducing the true Creditors to the status of insolvent paupers having no rights.

I feel that it's almost as good as disinformation of the kind that has spread so wide and far - and it has been so readily been accepted by all - when passed on from those considered as being "guru's" in the FREEdom activist area. I feel you will read this here, as a world 1st.

Those words: "operating under the jurisdiction of the Roman Curia"

Under the jurisdiction of the Roman Curia? I don't think so.

The group's Admin Team leader Gary and I have discussed this a number of times and I am now more than convinced that this is so wrong and I'll try and explain why this is so.

FICTIO - tiny.cc/xpdokx

In a previous post I commented that ....... In regards to "Fictio" (or, the fiction of law), jurisdiction only comes from our own consenting to being the NAME - and that this (in itself), is so 'regular' a happening, these days. There's that need to have us CONsent to the NAME.

Who is it that we are 'coerced' into consenting to-who do we have a need for them, to have us understand them? (Police, magistrates, men/women contracted to Council, Bank Card operators, men and women telephone operators/payment of accounts for Telcos, Power Company suppliers, etc.) Yes, they all have a need to get us to be 'the NAME'.

All that operate this 'fiction', do so UNlawfully.

This fact (in itself), has been hilighted by Anna von Reitz with (besides personage) "barratry" - the crime of knowingly bringing false claims into court.


All corporations in the world are "registered" within Rome. As such, they all come under the vatican 'corporate' umbrella. The Holy SEE is the "Legal" owner of all the corporations. (Trusts.) All dead entities.

As such (and, under this corrupt UNlawful 'system' of law that exists in the corporatised world that we are in), a corporation can only 'talk' with another corporation - such is the ('pretend' or, a 'discolouring' of the) law that those men or, women (as mentioned) 'acting' on behalf of the (corporate) Trusts involved, do need we (living flesh and blood men/women), to CONsent to being their (trust) NAME. Or, speak or 'give evidence on behalf of' this dead fiction Trust NAME.

(See eg; here)

[Beside a number of other matters] ... The Magistrate was clearly able to advise the 'witness' that he was giving 'evidence' on behalf of the corporation (the very NAME) and this advice went, unrebutted.

It's clear I feel that whilst non-competent justices/judges (those court officials, administrative clerks, magistrates, etc) operating down in the lowly Statute level of a 'fiction world' jurisdiction that is described at best (and, for expediency), as doing so, all under the 'colour of law'...that can now be so easily be proven as being all UNlawful.

Here's the 'kicker' - The 'Lawmaker' himself has said so, too. (Bare in mind that this blogpost started off under the premise that Trustees and Administrators of the corporate Trust constructs are "operating under the jurisdiction of the Roman Curia"?)

And the 2IC (I feel) to Pope Francis in his presentation of the motu proprio (he's the Secretary for Relations with States) Abp. Dominique Mamberti has put it like this:

.....,"One of the cornerstones of the system introduced by this law is constituted by the so-called rule of law, as a result of which administrative sanctions may be imposed only in cases defined by law."


We live in most interesting times, we certainly do. The 'race' is on, with various 'factions' of the United Nations flexing their muscles.

For mine, I'd be putting my money on the 1st ever Jesuit Lawmaker, that the world has seen. He (Francis) 'looks the goods', for mine.

Always, only an opinion.


Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia: Riezinger-von Reitzenstein von Lettow-Vorbeck
Thirty years A Lawyer, she [claims she] has served as an International Services Agent and as a private attorney in service to his Holiness Pope Benedict XVI and now, Pope Francis.


Recommended For You

Comments (1)

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.