Back when the current Queensland Governor Paul de Jersey was officially sworn into office in mid July, 2014, he made the following oath:
"I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second as lawful sovereign of Australia .... and to her heirs and successors according to law and I will well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second," he [as the 26th person to assume the position of Queensland Governor], said.
["Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second" is a Juristic entity.]
Following his swearing in and by the very same man who replaced him in his previous position that he held, as the Chief Justice of Queensland (Tim Carmody), the recently departed State Premier Campbell Newman (who himself had made both the appointments), commented:
.........."Queenslanders today are not only gaining not just a new governor but a quality family to be the Queen's representative in our great state of Queensland," is what Campbell Newman the now ex premier/state member, said.
On the Queensland Parliament website we are told that the Queensland Governor .... "is the personal representative of the Sovereign and that the Governor must always remain non-political".
Even more ..... "One of the most important duties is the opening of the Parliament following a State election and the granting of Royal Assent to Bills passed in the Legislative Assembly. With the assent of the Governor given on behalf of the Sovereign, the Bill becomes an Act of Parliament and thus a law of the land."
**Cough** ("the Bill becomes an Act of Parliament and thus a law of the land.")
And "powered by" who/what?
Following the recent election, it became even more comical.
February 09, 2015 - tinyurl.com/lw8xnr7
"Who Should the Queensland Governor Appoint as Premier?"
It would very much appear to me that the Governor most certainly becomes a 'team player', and have a clear understanding of his/her role.
Queensland/AUSTRALIA - The Royals? ... Never ever had it, and never ever was "the crown" - tinyurl.com/mc5g2zb
The ongoing deception or, is it total ignorance of those within the corporate Queensland government, the governor and any/all lawful roles in relation to lawmaking or, "policy enforcing" and as to who they/we all answer to (at law), should need no further explaining.
In recent times (Pope Benedict/Pope Francis) the Roman cult that under corrupt Popes and for centuries had controlled the slavery of the people, was 'killed off'.
It no longer exists .... and the "crown" remains with the sovereign himself, Pope Francis.
The Vatican is back to being a church and is now separate from the Holy SEE as the law making body, with the Pope being it's head or, the supreme power.
Above, it is pointed out that the Governor says (in his oath), that he refers to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second ...... as being the lawful sovereign of Australia and that he will serve her and her heirs and successors according to law ...
[according] To law?
What law? What Law does a Queen who is not the (and never ever was, the) "crown", ever have to [em-] 'power' men and women, as a 'pretend' sovereign?
[Or,] To install them as a "crown", in their own realm?
There-in lies a huge part of the LIES that are being perpetuated upon us all.
(Was the recently departed Premier Campbell Newman and now an ex State member, a "crown" in his own right? We know he wasn't.)
At law and under the Rule of Law, there can only ever be the one sovereign "crown". (No one is above the law.)
Always, only an opinion.