United States Citizen Intel Inside® Recovery on State population at $10.36 for 3 PCs = $31.08 each |
|||||
Mike Bruzzone, Camp Marketing, January 2017 |
|||||
FTC Docket 9341 Discovery Aid & Intel Corp Auditor Monitor at 15 USC 5, 15 and U.S. Constitution 9th amendment; retained by Congress for the people. |
|||||
10 year WW 'civil' RICO settlement @ 3 PCs each |
|||||
10 year + criminal RICO claim is validated on concealment and INTC 10K false certification. |
|||||
U.S. State & Territories only |
|||||
Alabama; |
$151,981,200 |
||||
Alaska; |
$22,897,630 |
||||
American Samoa; |
$1,725,530.00 |
||||
Arizona; |
$209,199,480 |
||||
Arkansas; |
$92,183,280.00 |
||||
California; |
$1,205,904,000.00 |
||||
Colorado; |
$166,464,480.00 |
||||
Connecticut; |
$111,794,760.00 |
||||
Delaware; |
$29,078,883.00 |
||||
District of Columbia |
$20,280,727.00 |
||||
Florida; |
$618,818,200.00 |
||||
Georgia: |
$313,908,000.00 |
||||
Guam; |
$4,952,846.00 |
||||
Hawaii: |
$44,133,600 |
||||
Idaho; |
$50,784,720 |
||||
Illinois; |
$400,310,400 |
||||
Indiana; |
$205,034,760 |
||||
Iowa; |
$96,565,560 |
||||
Kansas; |
$90,256,320 |
||||
Kentucky; |
$137,156,040 |
||||
Louisiana; |
$144,522,000 |
||||
Maine; |
$41,336,400 |
||||
Maryland; |
$185,734,080 |
||||
Massachusetts |
$209,634,600 |
||||
Michigan; |
$308,002,800 |
||||
Minnesota; |
$169,603,560 |
||||
Mississippi; |
$93,053,520 |
||||
Missouri; |
$188,469,120 |
||||
Montana; |
$31,825,920 |
||||
Nebraska; |
$58,492,560 |
||||
Nevada; |
$88,236,120 |
||||
New Hampshire |
$41,243,160 |
||||
New Jersey; |
$308,873,040 |
||||
New Mexico; |
$64,832,880 |
||||
New York; |
$261,268,480 |
||||
North Carolina; |
$309,059,520 |
||||
North Dakota; |
$22,993,978 |
||||
North Mariana Island |
$1,674,683 |
||||
Ohio; |
$360,217,200 |
||||
Oklahoma; |
$120,528,240 |
||||
Oregon; |
$123,387,600 |
||||
Pennsylvania; |
$397,513,200 |
||||
Puerto Rico; |
$115,797,522 |
||||
Rhode Island; |
$32,789,400 |
||||
South Carolina; |
$150,147,480 |
||||
South Dakota; |
$26,516,679 |
||||
Tennessee; |
$203,542,920 |
||||
Texas; |
$931,156,800 |
||||
United States Federal |
$1,050,000,000 |
||||
US Virgin Island |
$3,307,067 |
||||
Utah; |
$91,468,440 |
||||
Vermont; |
$19,473,546 |
||||
Virginia; |
$258,772,080 |
||||
Washington; |
$219,486,960 |
||||
West Virginia |
$57,498,000 |
||||
Wisconsin; |
$178,958,640 |
||||
Wyoming; |
$18,155,475.00 |
||||
Total |
$10,842,848,611 |
||||
Administrative |
Plus $500,000,000 distribution expense reimbursement fund |
||||
Note 1; State AGs prefer direct tally method on CPU and PC sales invoice, property tag, Windows license. |
|||||
Note 2; On direct receipt tally, Intel Inside recovery fund for any time period, is anticipated to fall short of recovery fund requirement on laundered CPU volumes. | |||||
Note 3; Falling short, direct receipt method will document Intel and dealing cartel tax evasion on laundered processor production volume. |
|||||
Note 4; Total Intel Inside price fix falsely certified "cooperative advertising" across 96 consecutive INTC 10K = $41,567,500,000. Doubles on regulating contribution through OEMs is not sought on that discovery hurdle and EUCC 37.990 amnesty as witnesses. | |||||
Note 5; Auditor monitor has recommended USDOJ cartel amnesty for Entity Intel Corp. from criminal RICO prosecution, federal and States tax evasion. | |||||
Note 6; Intel Inside compensatory on three PC purchase method presents an Intel Corporation negotiation entry point. |
|||||
Note 7: Remedies addressing civil racketeering are meant to relieve and move the NEW Intel forward, and beyond and behind, the old Intel dealing cartel monopoly operator. | |||||
Master Intel Inside rebated fee accrual table -
Intel Inside® False Certification Matching 1/2 on Regulating OEM Value to End Sale's Outlet 'registered metering' (sales) Commission and said "kick back" is a 'brand fee' reward. |
|||||||
End Sales Outlet = OEM Direct, Media Sales Preview Direct; broadcast, print, web and Retail Direct to end buyers; CPU in box and CPU in chassis. | |||||||
Mike Bruzzone, October 2008, FTC 9341 Discovery Aid for Docket 9341 respondent Intel Corporation |
|||||||
Year |
Annual Intel Inside 10K Matching Value only |
$ per CPU |
% Match |
||||
1993 |
$325,000,000 |
$9.65 |
3.6632% |
||||
1994 |
$459,000,000 |
$10.27 |
3.9840% |
||||
1995 |
$654,000,000 |
$11.92 |
4.0365% |
||||
1996 |
$974,000,000 |
$13.76 |
4.6721% |
||||
1997 |
$1,200,000,000 |
$14.06 |
4.7866% |
||||
1998 |
$1,300,000,000 |
$14.29 |
4.9480% |
||||
1999 |
$1,700,000,000 |
$14.68 |
5.7845% |
||||
2000 |
$2,000,000,000 |
$14.34 |
5.9301% |
||||
2001 |
$1,600,000,000 |
$10.37 |
6.0289% |
||||
2002 |
$1,700,000,000 |
$10.15 |
6.3518% |
||||
2003 |
$1,800,000,000 |
$10.59 |
5.9719% |
||||
2004 |
$2,100,000,000 |
$12.00 |
6.1387% |
||||
2005 |
$2,600,000,000 |
$14.69 |
6.6965% |
||||
2006 |
$2,300,000,000 |
$12.78 |
6.5005% |
||||
2007 |
$1,900,000,000 |
$10.27 |
4.9608% |
||||
2008 |
$1,890,000,000 |
$9.95 |
5.0285% |
||||
2009 |
$1,400,000,000 |
$7.19 |
3.9855% |
||||
2010 |
$1,800,000,000 |
$7.90 |
4.2231% |
||||
2011 |
$2,100,000,000 |
$8.86 |
3.5001% |
||||
2012 |
$1,865,500,000 |
$7.22 |
3.5000% |
||||
2013 |
$1,900,000,000 |
$6.64 |
3.5647% |
||||
2014 |
$1,800,000,000 |
$6.16 |
3.2218% |
||||
2015 |
$1,800,000,000 |
$6.16 |
3.2517% |
||||
2016 |
$1,800,000,000 |
$6.16 |
3.0303% |
||||
2017 |
$1,400,000,000 |
$4.79 |
2.2307% |
||||
2018 |
$1,200,000,000 |
$4.11 |
1.6938% |
||||
TOTAL |
$41,567,500,000 |
||||||
Average |
$10.00 |
4.45% |
|||||
Actual recovery value is $20 but remedial only seeks 1/2 that is the final 'matching value'. |
|||||||
|
Note 1: Represents the average of Intel Inside kick back value on OEM and/or Intel regulating value ascertained from INTC 10Ks defined by Intel OEM sales contract agreement. Ringmaster (the old Intel) sales contract combines OEM's laterally tied again vertically by laterally too Media and Retail sales outlets. OEMs pay the regulating or triggering 1/2 of Intel inside 1993 - 2008 taken by Intel under contract in CPU price and placed in their specific account. Any first tier OEM Intel Inside account 'rebate pool' is artificially weighted on Intel Inside accruals from CPU procurements greater than OEM demand, that surplus is then OEM brokered into secondary channels without the Intel Inside accrual value. Media know which OEMs have the largest pools; a weighted attractor, and compete to clear pools by selling specific OEM PCs. Certain OEMs begin to revolt around 2005 long time claiming Intel and PC Media extortion. After 2008 Intel stockholders pick up the price of both the regulating and matching Intel Inside "avoidable consumer cost charge". |
|||||||
Note 2: OEM and/or Intel regulating value is defined on average as double the end kick back value; rebated-fee; ie., x regulating sum = y matching sum for sales report to Intel. It's not exactly this way presents a simplification. |
|||||||
Note 3; Kick back is a cartel administrative buyer cost : charge for paying the end sales out for 'registered metering' final channel CPU sale for report to Intel. No one leaves this money on the table. Traditionally on channel competition for Intel Inside commission, total by product volume fund, Intel CPUs sell through first and all others sell through last. |
|||||||
Note 4a; Specific boxed CPU and CPU in chassis is calculated OEM Price * Annual % rebate * 2. |
|||||||
Note 4b; Example Haswell octa 5960X 1K $999 / 2 = OEM price $499.50 * 3.2218% (2014) regulator + 3.2218% match = $32.18 Intel Inside price fix |
|||||||
|
Note 4c; Example Clovertown quad X5365 1K $1172 / 2 OEM = $586 * 4.9% (2007) regulator + 4.9% match = $37.75 Intel Inside price fix. Note 4d; Example Kaby Lake dual Celeron G3945 1K $52 / 2 OEM = $26 * 2.23% (2017) regulator + 2.23% match = $1.15 Intel Inside price fix. Traditionally media would not claim any single Celeron waiting for that pool of product values to grow into many, and would then take that low value price fix pool off the table through a single major PC product review. Price fix is meant to pay for media operation cost, Intel product sales preview, application benchmark lab, OEM, media and retail 'Intel channel' sales expansion. |
|||||||
Intel Inside price fix 'academic' orientation here;
Intel Inside Federal Orientation; Academic Treatise (NYSE:A) | Seeking Alpha
Unites States Attorneys General 'standard' Intel Inside recovery complaint;
Intel Inside Price Fix Recovery For Plaintiffs; AGs Standard Complaint | Seeking Alpha