Daily State of the Markets
Good morning. The question I heard over and over again on Friday was if Egypt is likely to be the next big problem for the markets. It seems that the national pastime of U.S. investors these days is to make sure they don't get fooled again by something that comes out of the blue. However, as I've pointed out many times in the past, it isn't a matter of identifying problems (there are ALWAYS lots of problems in the world) but rather figuring out when an issue might matter to the market. Remember, in the stock market, things don't matter until they do - and then they matter a lot.
I recognize that I may be guilty of beating this issue to a pulp, but given that (1) Wall Street spent most of the first quarter of 2000 figuring out new, creative ways to value companies with no earnings (remember the introduction of the price-to-sales ratio?) (2) few, if any, individual investors gave the mania that was occurring a second thought ("It's a new era"), and (3) ditto on that for the mortgage/credit crisis (which took more than a year to develop, by the way), I'm not terribly convinced that the public is going to see the next big thing coming. Thus, I prefer to let the market "tell me" what's important and what isn't.
On the topic of what the market is "saying" lately, it is quite clear that negative news has not been important. It appears that investors have been on a mission to get money put back into the stock market. After all, the powers that be on the street have ordained that stocks are heading up something on the order +20% this year (well, okay, maybe everyone isn't saying +20%, but a +10% gain seems to be universal lock according to the talking heads). As such, you can't really blame the average Joe for suddenly deciding that the stock market is a great idea for 2011.
So, is Egypt suddenly "important"? Is the rioting in the Middle East (remember, there's a lot more than just Egypt involved here) the new focal point? Are we going to spend the next three months worrying about what might happen next over there?
While anything can capture the market's attention for a short period, I don't believe that Egypt is the next big thing. In my humble opinion, there were lots of excuses for Friday's selling and the bottom line is that the buyers simply stood aside during the news- and program-driven selloff.
Here's a list of excuses traders might have espoused on Friday to support the selling of anything and everything.
But, what is so interesting to me about all of the above is that everything on that list was all available to traders BEFORE the market opened. The riots in Egypt had been going on for days and had followed rioting in other spots. The GDP report had been released an hour earlier and the futures had had actually rallied on the news. So, when the stock market headed higher during the first 20 minutes of Friday's session it appeared that none of the things the popular press blamed for the day's decline mattered.
Here's my take on the real story. During the first 20 minutes of trading, there was a glitch at the NASDAQ. While the S&P and Dow were at or very near new 52-week highs, the NASDAQ index was being reported as unchanged. Then there was word that the NASDAQ was actually trading lower before they fixed the problem. So, what would any self respecting computer-driven trader do in that situation? Yep, you guessed it - lock in the spread!
There is little doubt in my mind that the initial sell programs were run to work some arbitrage angle on the differing price levels on the indices. Then, when the programs started to see little resistance, others piled on. And from there, you can probably extrapolate what happened as the sell programs fed on one another. Now let's toss in the following: (1) The fact that the indices appeared to be failing badly at those big, round numbers, (2) he news was all about rioting and the potential for disaster in the Middle East, (3) traders didn't want the "headline risk" over the weekend, and (4) any self respecting buyer likely decided to "stand down" on a Friday.
So there you have it; lots of excuses for sell programs, taking profits, not buying, etc. And while Egypt could very easily become the market's focal point, I'd be willing to bet that this turns out to be "the little pullback" that most of us have been expecting for some time now.
Turning to this morning... With no major negative surprises or developments out of Egypt over the weekend, traders appear to be covering some shorts in the early going. Thus, it will be interesting to see if the buyers return today. If the rebound attempt fails early, look for the pullback to continue on for a while.
On the Economic front... Personal Incomes rose by +0.4% in December, which was below the consensus expectations for an increase of +0.5%. The November level was revised higher to +0.4% from +0.3%. Personal Spending (now called “Consumption”) for the month rose by +0.7%, which was above the expectations of +0.6% and the November reading of +0.4%.
Thought for the day: Keep in mind that not every opinion is worthy of your attention...
Here are the Pre-Market indicators we review each morning before the opening bell...
Wall Street Research Summary
* Report includes items that make comparisons to the consensus estimate questionable
Long positions in stocks mentioned: none
For more "top stock" portfolios and research, visit TopStockPortfolios.com
The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are those of Mr. David Moenning and may not actually come to pass. Mr. Moenning’s opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations. The analysis and information in this report and on our website is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report or on our websites is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed nor any Portfolio constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program. The opinions and forecasts expressed are those of the editors of TopStockPortfolios and may not actually come to pass. The opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations of any specific security nor specific investment advice. Stocks should always consult an investment professional before making any investment.
Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.
The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.
The information contained in this report is provided by Ridge Publishing Co. Inc. (Ridge). One of the principals of Ridge, Mr. David Moenning, is also President and majority shareholder of Heritage Capital Management, Inc. (NASDAQ:HCM) a Chicago-based money management firm. HCM is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser. HCM also serves as a sub-advisor to other investment advisory firms. Ridge is a publisher and has not registered as an investment adviser. Neither HCM nor Ridge is registered as a broker-dealer.
Employees and affiliates of HCM and Ridge may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Editors will indicate whether they or HCM has a position in stocks or other securities mentioned in any publication. The disclosures will be accurate as of the time of publication and may change thereafter without notice.
Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.