Contributor Since 2012
Mr. Pearce has tried, arbitrated and mediated numerous disputes involving complex securities, commodities, administrative, contract, commercial, business tort and employment law issues for over 35 years. He has represented hundreds of clients in Federal and state courts (trial and appellate) as well as administrative, arbitration, and mediation proceedings before the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodities Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC"), Florida Office Financial Regulation (FlaOFR), Florida Division of Securities & Investor Protection ("FDS"), Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), National Association of Securities Dealers regulation, Inc. ("NASD"), New York Stock Exchange, Inc. ("NYSE") and/or National Futures Association ("NFA"). Mr. Pearce is a Florida Circuit Court Civil Mediator and a respected mediator in the FINRA Mediation Program. He also acts as a private judge or arbitrator in mini-trials and arbitration proceedings, respectively. Mr. Pearce has also served as a Federal Court-appointed Receiver- an attorney who is called upon by Federal and state regulators (SEC, CFTC and FlaOFR) to take over companies engulfed in legal problems. Areas of Practice • Courtroom Litigation, Arbitration and Mediation Proceedings Involving • Securities and Commodities Law • Business & Commercial Law • Federal, State and Industry Enforcement Actions • Employment Law A Brokerage Employees Only • Trust / Estate / Guardianship Law • Probate & Estate Administration Education • Hofstra University School of Law, Hempstead, New York J.D. - 1979 • Hofstra University School of Business, Hempstead, New York M.B.A. - 1979 • Florida Tech B.S. – 1973 Professional Associations and Memberships • American Association for Justice • Florida Justice Association • Broward County Bar Association • Broward County Justice Association • Palm Beach County Bar Association • Palm Beach County Justice Association • Public Investor Arbitration Bar Association • South Palm Beach County Bar Association Past Employment Positions • Lerner & Pearce, P.A., January 1, 1990 - December 31, 1999 • Lerner, Harris, Pearce, P.A., March 1, 1983 - December 31, 1989 • U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission, May 1, 1980 - February 28, 1983
Wall Street calls them "high-yield bonds" but Main Street has a better name, "junk bonds." These are long-term, interest bearing IOUs issued by companies or municipalities with poor credit ratings (indicating an inability to pay those IOUs) or none at all! These bonds pay high yields for one and only one reason-it's the only way to get investors to buy them. Apparently, many investors have forgotten who popularized them in the 1980s, Drexel-Burnham and Michael Milken, a bankrupt brokerage and felon, respectively.
High-yield (junk) municipal bonds have attracted about $5.3 billion of investors' money so far this year, but some experts think that their party is about to end. The reason for the robust growth is that the yield of junk municipal bonds is approximately 5.2 percent compared with investment grade munis that are yielding 2 percent. Similarly, the total return of one junk municipal bond ETF is 9.8 percent compared with 6.9 percent for an investment-grade muni bond ETF. While the increased yield is attractive to investors, the difference in performance is not enough to compensate for the additional risk, according to some experts ("Will 'Junk' Munis Bite Back?" by Ben Levisohn, Wall Street Journal).
The risk of high-yield (junk) munis is significant. The stagnant U.S. economy means lower tax revenues, which is putting severe stress on municipal budgets. On top of that, states, suffering from lower tax revenues, are likely to continue cutting funding to local governments. If these stresses reach a tipping point, there may be a run out of junk municipal bonds and funds as the herd stampedes into safer investment-grade municipal bonds.
One reason for the flow of investor funds into junk municipal bonds is that municipalities have been refinancing older bonds at record levels. Investors looking for the same yield must go toward the junk end of the spectrum to find it. But the spread - the difference between the yields of junk and investment grade - is narrowing. This has experts worried that the end is near for the rally into junk municipal bonds.
High-yield (junk) munis that back ancillary projects such as nursing homes and hospitals are generally even more risky because they are not general obligation bonds that are backed by the taxing powers of the city, county or state.
Defaults have been relatively rare but could increase, especially as state governments cut local government funding. The article notes that Detroit came within days of a default, leading a rating agency to cut Detroit's debt rating on June 12.
In sum, more advisers are recommending that junk muni bond investors should get out now while the getting is good. "The weak are getting weaker. This is a great time for an upgrade," one money manager was quoted as saying.
The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at email@example.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.