The Closing Bell

Aug. 24, 2019 10:41 AM ET
Please Note: Blog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors.

Value, Growth At A Reasonable Price, Dividend Investing

Contributor Since 2010

Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 46 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder. Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns, managing a risk arbitrage hedge fund and an investment banking boutique specializing in funding second stage private companies. Through his involvement with Investing for Survival and Seeking Alpha, Steve hopes that his experience can help other investors build their wealth while avoiding tough lessons that he learned the hard way.

The Closing Bell


I am taking next week off.  Back 9/3

Statistical Summary

Current Economic Forecast

2018 estimates (revised)

Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product 1.5-2.5%

Inflation +1.5-2%

Corporate Profits 10-15%


Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product 1.5-2.5%

Inflation +1.5-2.5%

Corporate Profits 5-6%

Current Market Forecast

Dow Jones Industrial Average

Current Trend (revised):

Short Term Uptrend 23490-33730

Intermediate Term Uptrend 14513-30732 (?)

Long Term Uptrend 6849-30311(?)

2018 Year End Fair Value 13800-14000

2019 Year End Fair Value 14500-14700

Standard & Poor’s 500

Current Trend (revised):

Short Term Uptrend 2573-3473

Intermediate Term Uptrend 1383-3193 (?) Long Term Uptrend 937-3217 (?)

2018 Year End Fair Value 1700-1720

2019 Year End Fair Value 1790-1810

Percentage Cash in Our Portfolios

Dividend Growth Portfolio 56%

High Yield Portfolio 55%

Aggressive Growth Portfolio 56%


The Trump economy is a neutral for equity valuations. Not much data this week, but what there was, was mixed: above estimates: month to date retail chain store sales, weekly jobless claims, the August Kansas City Fed manufacturing index, July leading economic indicators; below estimates: weekly mortgage/purchase applications, July new home sales, the August flash manufacturing, services and composite PMI’s; in line with estimates: July existing home sales.

The primary indicators were also mixed: July leading economic indicators (+), July existing home sales (0), July new home sales (-). I am rating this week a neutral. Score: in the last 201 weeks, sixty-six were positive, ninety negative and forty-five neutral.

Will Consumers And Services Keep The US Out Of Recession?

While I was elated by the strong earnings and guidance that major retailers reported this week, that was offset by the dismal August PMI’s, another inversion in the yield curve and a blow up in the US/China trade dispute. That leaves the yellow warning light flashing.

Monthly Macro Monitor: Does Anyone Not Know About The Yield Curve?


Way Beyond The "12%" - Exposing The "But It's Only Manufacturing" Narrative

Overseas, the stats were slightly positive, a welcome respite in an otherwise lengthy negative trend. But that is not enough to alter my opinion that the global economy is a drag on our own.

[a] the July German PPI ran hotter than estimates, the August flash manufacturing, services and composite PMI’s were above estimates; August UK industrial orders declined less than consensus; June EU construction output, July CPI and August consumer confidence were disappointing while the August flash manufacturing, services and composite PMI’s were above expectations,

German companies brace for recession.

So does German government.

Germany Prepares Stimulus In Case Of "Deep Recession"

[b] the July Japanese trade deficit was larger than anticipated; the August flash manufacturing PMI and the June All Industry Index was lower than expected while the August flash services and composite PMI’s were higher; July CPI was, in line.

Developments this week that impact the economy:

  1. trade: it was a wild week on this front,

[a] first, Trump made another concession to the Chinese, giving Huawei a 90 day reprieve to conduct business with US companies,

[b] then not only did the Chinese do nothing in return but they instituted tariffs on additional US goods and warned the US not to engage in currency manipulation.

Trump’s delay in imposing tariffs may have been taken as a sign of weakness by the Chinese

Goldman: Trump's Decision To Delay Tariffs Was Seen As Weakness By China, And Escalated The Trade War

[c] Trump responded by upping the 25% tariffs scheduled to take effect October 1st to 30% and the 10% tariffs scheduled to take effect September 1st to 15%.

Trump Hikes Tariffs On Chinese Goods In Retaliation To Trade War Escalation

Three points:

[a] however further this back and forth imposition of economic penalties go, it doesn’t change the fact that Trump has more to lose on a short term basis than China, i.e. he has a 2020 election to worry about and Xi doesn’t. Not only that but the harsher the confrontation becomes, the more US voters are negatively impacted and that just ups the pressure on Trump. Which gets to the point that Trump is a lot more likely to fold than the Chinese---which if he does, would {i} leave the Chinese free to continue their unfair trade practices for the long term and {ii} make all the economic agony that the global economy has had to endure during the US/China trade dispute for naught.

In short, whatever Trump ultimately does, negative headlines are in our future. If he folds, the economy will improve short term but the long term economic growth prospects are negative. If he hangs tough, the economy will continue to experience a short term drag on growth but the longer term outlook improves.

[b] this battle has reached the stage that it may start impacting the general confidence level of even those businesses that are not affected by China trade. If so, then their decisions to invest or hire could be delayed; and that is not going to help our growth prospects,

[c] on Friday, the Chinese/Trump trade headlines pushed the Powell speech on to the back page. As you know, I have recently been questioning the strength of the Fed/Market co-dependency. The point here is that if the trade disputes start to impact investor sentiment and Fed can’t rescue the Market with another rate cut, the Fed/Market connection could be weakened. As you know, my thesis is that once that linkage breaks, stocks will be on their way to Fair Value---a lot lower as computed by my Valuation Model.

  1. fiscal policy: We got another great piece of news from the congressional budget office this week, predicting that the budget deficit would exceed $1 trillion annually in 2020 and beyond. All thanks to a tax cut which wasn’t needed and a deficit expanding budget deal recently agreed to by both parties. Just a reminder that the national debt has reached the level at which research shows it becomes a drag on economic growth. This is not a plus for long term secular growth.

  1. monetary policy: there was lots of activity this week; but when all was said and done, there was little clarity about future policy moves.

[a] the minutes of the last FOMC meeting were released. It proved a nonevent because the meeting was before Trump imposed the latest round of tariffs. So, the generally accepted assumption was that the narrative would have been much different, if the meeting had occurred after the Donald’s action,

[b] the annual Jackson Hole conference took place Thursday and Friday. Overall the tone, in my opinion, was mixed. Several regional presidents spoke and implied that a rate cut was not in order in September. In Powell’s presentation, he sounded more dovish. But it is clear from both the FOMC minutes and the discussions in Jackson Hole that there is disagreement in the ranks---making the outcome of the September meeting uncertain.

[c] if that isn’t enough for the dedicated Fed watchers, the Jackson Hole narrative was completely swamped by the news of the Chinese tariffs and Trump’s counterpunch.

The bottom line being that not only does it appear that the Fed is losing control of interest rates to the Market, it may be losing control of the entire economic narrative to trade---at least in investors’ minds. {I continue to argue it never had control of the economy, otherwise, growth wouldn’t have been subpar after $4 trillion in QE and multiple rate cuts.}

One other item should be included in this discussion: this week, the ECB released the minutes from its last meeting which showed that it is ready to lower rates and ramp up bond purchases. Which brings to mind the definition of insanity. The ECB’s QE put our own to shame and, as you know, most EU interest rates are negative. And yet, and yet, its economy is in worse shape than our own AND the ECB want to do more.

  1. global hotspots. the Middle East hostility remains contained though the Iranians threatened to close all oil shipping lanes if they are not allowed to export their own oil.

Unfortunately, the number of global trouble spots is growing:

[a] the unrest in Hong Kong; while ostensively a battle over Hong Kong government’s right to deport troublemakers to the Chinese mainland, it has become intermeshed with the US/China trade skirmish in that the Chinese are accusing the US of interference,

[b] Italy is again on the verge of political/economic collapse. By itself, I don’t consider that a big problem; but to the extent that it would cause disruptions in the EU banking system, it could precipitate a much larger problem. And nothing says extra pressure like a hard ‘Brexit’,

[c] Japan and South Korea escalated their dispute, refusing to share intelligence.

[d] the Brexit deadline is approaching and it looks a like a no-deal Brexit is the highest probability outcome,

Bottom line: on a secular basis, the US economy is growing at an historically below average rate. The principal cause of the restraint being totally irresponsible fiscal (running monstrous deficits at full employment adding to too much debt) and monetary (pushing liquidity into the financial system that has done little to help the economy but has led to the gross mispricing and misallocation of assets) policies.

The Anatomy of the Coming Recession | by Nouriel Roubini

Cyclically, the US economy continues to limp along which is not surprising given the lethargic global economy and the continuing trade wars. Indeed, this progress is a miracle given all the aforementioned fiscal and monetary headwinds. That said, the yellow warning light is still flashing.

The Market-Disciplined Investing


The Averages (25628, 2847) were hammered yesterday and it occurred on noticeably higher volume and very poor breadth. The Dow ended below its 100 DMA (now resistance) and below its 200 DMA (now support; if it remains there through the close next Wednesday, it will revert to resistance). The S&P finished below its 100 DMA; this is the ninth time it has crossed this level in the last fifteen trading days. Clearly, it is acting as a magnet. I continue to withhold a support/resistance call. It closed above its 200 DMA (now support).

The VIX rose 19 %, ending above 100 DMA (now support) voiding Wednesday’s break and above its 200 DMA (now support).

The long bond popped 1 5/8 %, finishing above both MA’s and in uptrends across all timeframes. It continues to be overextended.

Bonds are expensive - Yet fighting irrationality is not easy

The dollar declined ½ %, but still closed in short and long term uptrends and above both MA’s. It has that minor resistance level at its July 31st high.

Yuan crashing

The Yuan Is Crashing

So is the dollar

Dollar Tumbles On Speculation Trump To Announce FX Intervention "Shortly"

Gold soared 2 %, making a five year high and is now within very short term and short term uptrends and above both MA’s. However, it still has the gap up open from two weeks ago which needs to be closed.

Bottom line: long term, the Averages are in uptrends across all timeframes; so, the assumption is that they will continue to advance. Short term, they voided very short term downtrends but are stuck in the trading range dating back to August 5th---though the Dow ended right on the low.

The long bond, the dollar and gold continue to point at the need for a safety trade.

Friday in the charts.

Bonds are expensive - Yet fighting irrationality is not easy

Fundamental-A Dividend Growth Investment Strategy

The DJIA and the S&P are well above ‘Fair Value’ (as calculated by our Valuation Model), the improved regulatory environment and the potential pluses (?) from trade notwithstanding. At the moment, the important factors bearing on Fair Value (corporate profitability and the rate at which it is discounted) are:

  1. the extent to which the economy is growing. The economy continues to struggle forward against multiple headwinds. As you know, the dataflow over the last couple of months has raised my concerns that it may ultimately succumb to these forces---to such an extent that I started the yellow warning light flashing. Not helping matters is the recent surge in bond, dollar and gold prices; all of which point to a flight to safety.

My sluggish growth forecast is a neutral but that could change if the stats deteriorate further.

  1. the [lack of] success of current trade negotiations. If Trump can create a fairer political/trade regime, it would almost surely be constructive for secular earnings growth.

However, that ain’t happenin’, Indeed, conditions only got worse this week with the Chinese raising tariffs on US additional goods and Trump responding by upping the tariff rates on those already or about to be imposed. Not helping this is [a] the Chinese accusing the US of complicity in the Hong Kong riots, [b] the US sailing a warship through the Straits of Taiwan, [c] the US defending Vietnam’s mineral rights in the South China Sea and [d] Japan requesting additional US air support over fear of Chinese aggression.

As you know, I believe that the Chinese will not even consider making any compromise before the 2020 elections, if ever. So, the magnitude of this quarrel will likely continue to be determined by Trump’s actions. If he wants to get more contentious, it will and vice versa. To be clear, I still believe that what he is doing is the right course for the economic long term. But short term, pain is the word. The only question is how much.

  1. the resumption of QE by the global central banks. That is now occurring worldwide. This week, the ECB made it clear it was contemplating another big dose of QE; and the US bond market continues to price in multiple cuts in the Fed Funds rate this year.

I have maintained for some time that the key to the Market is monetary policy, more specifically, its co-dependency with the Fed. But this week, investors again appeared to begin to question their faith in its ability to navigate the US economy through an increasingly trying economic climate. While I am not suggesting a change the paradigm of central bank/stock market co-dependency, the risk is heightening that this could occur.

  1. current valuations. I believe that Averages are grossly overvalued [as determined by my Valuation Model].

At the moment, [a] the US economic numbers are not that great, the global stats are worse and, absent a US/China trade deal, are not apt to get better---all of which augurs poorly for corporate profits; though to be fair, Q2 earnings season was better than expected---including the retail sector, [b] long term interest rates are falling, suggesting that a weaker economy, and perhaps even recession, may be in our future, and yet [c] equity prices are still showing little sign of challenging their long term upward momentum.

The only explanation that I have for this is in the context that the global central banks are all in on their support of equity markets. For the last decade, they have measured their success by the performance of the stock Market, acted accordingly and been victorious. As long as that is the paradigm, fundamental economics and valuations will likely remain irrelevant. But as I noted over the last two weeks, that may be changing.

As prices continue to rise, I will be primarily focused on those stocks that trade into their Sell Half Range and act accordingly. However, there are certain segments of the economy/Market that have been punished severely (e.g. health care) with the stocks of the companies serving those industries down 30-70%. I am compiling a list of potential Buy candidates that can be bought on any correction in the Market; even a minor one. As you know, I recently added AbbVie to the Dividend Growth and High Yield Buy Lists.

Bottom line: fiscal policy is negatively impacting the E in P/E. On the other hand, a new regulatory environment is a plus. Any improvement in our trade regime with China should have a positive impact on secular growth and, hence, equity valuations---if it occurs. More important, a global central bank ‘put’ has returned and, if history is any guide, will almost assuredly be a plus for stock prices.

As a reminder, my Portfolio’s cash position didn’t reach its current level as a result of the Valuation Models estimate of Fair Value for the Averages. Rather I apply it to each stock in my Portfolio and when a stock reaches its Sell Half Range (overvalued), I reduce the size of that holding. That forces me to recognize a portion of the profit of a successful investment and, just as important, build a reserve to buy stocks cheaply when the inevitable decline occurs.

Recommended For You


To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.