Pinpointing Fibonacci Entries And Exits

Sep. 12, 2012 10:34 AM ETGLD, IAU, AMZN, M
TomAspray profile picture
TomAspray's Blog
Please Note: Blog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors.

Contributor Since 2010

Tom Aspray, professional trader and analyst was originally trained as a biochemist but began using his computer expertise to analyze the financial markets in the early 1980s. Mr. Aspray has written widely on technical analysis and has given over 60 presentations around the world. Many of the technical indicators that Mr. Aspray wrote about in the 1980s, such as the MACD, have since gained worldwide acceptance. Tom is regular contributor to Forbes where he writes a regular Week Ahead column.  His expertise as a technical analyst has been acknowledged by the WSJ as well as some of the best known technical analysts.

MoneyShow's Tom Aspray often uses Fibonacci analysis to determine likely entry points and profit targets for his Charts in Play recommendations. Here, he uses a few recent examples to examine more closely how he establishes these preferred buy levels.

In determining whether a market is likely to go up or down, I first look at the monthly, weekly, and daily charts. This step often is enough for me to determine which ones need more careful analysis.

In the second phase, on-balance-volume and relative performance analysis play a primary role, though other technical tools are often also used.

Once I find a market that I think has a high probability of going up or down, then further work must be done in order to determine an entry level, potential stop, and price objective.

I come across a number of markets each week that I think show a good potential to rise or fall 10% to 15%, but they are dismissed as they do not present any reasonable risk strategy at current levels. Often, I will determine that risking 5% to make 10% to 12% is not worth it.

When I am looking to buy or sell a market that is correcting against a major trend, Fibonacci retracement analysis plays an important role in helping me determine a possible entry point, as well as a profit objective.

In this article, I would like to review some current as well as past markets to show you the process that I use to identify a market to trade, and how Fibonacci analysis is included to determine not only entry but also exit levels.

Since the start of the summer, I have been watching the gold market, as I was aware of the seasonal tendency for it to bottom in the latter part of July. Since the highs in September of 2011, I have been looking for a correction within the major trend that would last long enough to reverse the extreme bullish sentiment that prevailed last summer.

Click to Enlarge

The major support level for the SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) that I identified soon after the top was the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement support level at $140, which was calculated from the October 2008 low of $66 and the September 2011 high of $185.85.

For those who are not familiar with Fibonacci analysis, a violation of this level would have indicated a further decline to the major 50% support at $135. (To learn more, read Fibonacci Analysis: Master The Basics.)

The fact that the monthly on-balance volume (OBV) had confirmed the highs in September 2011 made me confident that a major top was not in place. As of the end of August 2012, the monthly OBV had moved back above its WMA which is a positive sign.

GLD made a low of $148.27 on December 29 (missing my buy level of $148.20), then rallied 17% over the next two months. The sharp reversal on March 1 and the poor volume on the rally suggested that the corrective period for gold prices was not over.

Click to Enlarge

In May, the sentiment had become more negative, which suggested the worst of the correction was over.

On June 8, after GLD had rallied to a short-term high of $159.20, I recommended going 50% long at $152.42 and 50% long $150.28, with a stop at $147.28 (meaning a risk of approx. 2.6%). This first buy level represented a point between the short-term 50% and 61.8% support level, while the second level was just above the psychological support at $150.

I wanted to give the position enough room under the December low of $148.27 so as to not get stopped on a quick downdraft. I was concerned that a decisive break of the December lows could lead to a test of the major 38.2% support level.

In the past week, GLD has overcome the downtrend on the daily chart and completed the triangle or flag formation (lines a and b). The ability of GLD to overcome the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement resistance sets the next upside target at $167, which is the 50% retracement level.

The key 61.8% level is at $171.50, which is not far below the significant chart resistance from November 2011 and February 2012 in the $174 to $175.46 area. The daily OBV has broken through the resistance (line d) that goes back to last November. The weekly OBV (not shown) also indicates that an important low is in place.

A daily close above the 50% and of course the 61.8% retracement resistance would further support a move to new highs. The 127.2% Fibonacci retracement target on the monthly GLD chart (see figure 1) is at $196, and that is where I would be looking to take some partial profits.

GLD is a tough buy here, as the first minor support is in the $157 to $158.50 area (line c) with further levels at $154.80. Therefore, the risk of buying now is a bit too high for my liking. If the rally stalls near current levels, a setback into this support zone over the near term should set up a new buying opportunity. Sentiment has quickly turned more bullish, so this is a possibility.

In my opinion, it is more likely that GLD will test stronger resistance before the first rally phase is completed. The next daily sell signals should be followed by a correction back to the 38.2% to 50% support level, where additional buying can be done.

I have found that using the longer-term OBV and RS analysis can be one of the best ways to determine whether a correction is a buying opportunity or not. Specifically, I look for the monthly OBV and RS analysis to confirm a major new high, and then develop a strategy to buy on the correction.

Click to Enlarge (AMZN) is a good case in point. Its correction from the 2007 high of $101.09 had a classic a-b-c pattern, and at the end of January 2009 (line 1), the monthly RS line moved back above its WMA. The relative performance confirmed the 2007 highs.

The monthly OBV formed higher highs in 2007 and 2008 (line c), and had a strong uptrend (line d) from the 2007 lows. The OBV was already back above its WMA as the overall market was bottoming (line 1).

The rally from the lows at $34.68 lasted until April 2010, as AMZN reached a high of $151.09. This was just above the 161.8% target from the 2007 to 2008 correction, which was at $142.62. The 127.2% Fibonacci retracement target at $119.49 was hit 11 months after the lows.

Click to Enlarge

AMZN dropped to a low of $106.01 in June 2010, which was just below the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement support from the 2008 low of $106.62. The weekly chart of AMZN shows that this decline also tested trend line support (line b) and prices were also close to the weekly Starc- band.

There were several bullish factors heading into these lows that favored having resting buy orders in the market. The monthly OBV and RS had been confirming the price action and had long-term bullish patterns. The weekly analysis also suggested AMZN was correcting, not topping, and the RS line had formed a continuation pattern (line c and d).

The weekly OBV was holding well above its flat WMA in June and was forming higher lows (line f), unlike prices. Typically, I look to buy at just above the 38.2% support, and then try to do additional buying below this support.

For the stop, using one under the 2007 high of $101.09 as well as the psychological support level of $100 was a reasonable approach. Under the 50% support at $92.89 was too wide. Round-number stops are a bad idea, but a stop of $99.28 should have been wide enough to protect against any transitory breaks of the $100 level.

As for the buy level, 0.5% above the 38.2% support at $106.62 would have worked out to be $107.15. As for a second buy area, the mid-point from the high of $101.09 and the 38.2% support at $106.62 would be $103.85. This would work out to an overall risk of 5.9%.

With the upside target, I prefer scaling out of long positions, as it helps reduce the overall risk to the portfolio and can be positive psychologically. Selling just below the prior high of $151.09 would have been a valid approach.

My main target would have been the 127.2% Fibonacci retracement target from the $151.09 high to the $105.66 low, which was at $163.45. Therefore, attempting to sell at 1% to 0.5% below this level, say at $161.80 to $162.60, would have been the plan.

As it turned out, AMZN eventually exceeded the 161.8% Fibonacci retracement target at $179.17, eventually reaching a high of $191.60 in January 2011. (For my current Fibonacci analysis of AMZN, see last week's column.

Next: What's Next For Macy's ?

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.