Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Feb 3 & Feb 4, 2021 (Pre NY Open): What Will Long-Term Rates Do If The Treasury Cuts Debt Issuance? 10yr Yield Is Likely To Rise, Not Fall -- Here Is Why

Feb. 04, 2021 9:26 AM ET
Please Note: Blog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors.

Asset class modeling, Macro analyst, Bonds & Equities, Currencies & Commodities

Seeking Alpha Analyst Since 2011

Robert P. Balan runs Predictive Analytic Models, #1-rated trading unit at Seeking Alpha. PAM trades Swiss HF funds using Federal Reserve, US Treasury, and term (money) market liquidity data flows as basis for trading decisions. He is domiciled in Zurich, Switzerland.

Robert Balan has 5 decades of experience in the financial markets. Education in Mining Engineering, Computer Science & Engineering, M.S in Quantitative Finance, and training in Economics led to a commodity analysis career during the commodity boom of the early 1970s. Robert made a switch to global macro focus in the early 1980 when the commodity bull market waned, with specialization in foreign exchange. Robert wrote a very high profile daily FX analysis while Geneva-based (Lloyds Bank Int'l) in the mid-1980s (the first FX commentary with a real global readership, "most accessed" in the Reuters and Telerate networks from 1988 to 1994).

He worked for Swiss Bank Corp and Union Bank of Switzerland (precursors of today's new UBS) as head of technical research in various finance centers (London, New York, and subsequently, head of prop trading at SBC in Toronto ) from the late 1980s to mid-1990s. A stint at Bank of America as head of global technical research followed in late 1990s to the early 2000s. 

Robert returned to Switzerland in 2004 as head of technical research and strategy, and FX market analyst for Swiss Life Asset Management in Zurich. Robert wrote FX analysis and capital markets commentary for Saxo Bank (Denmark) in the early 2000s. He joined Diapason Commodities Management (CH) in Lausanne in 2008 as senior market strategist, and subsequently Chief Market Strategist, utilizing fundamental macroeconomic drivers and structural/technical data in modeling asset price and sector movements. 

Robert wrote a book on the Elliott Wave Principle in 1988, which has been hailed by the London Society of Technical Analysts as best ever book written on the subject. Robert is a member of the National Association for Business Economics (NABE), U.S.A. 

Summary

  • We expect yields to be generally on the rise for another week or so -- equities should rise alongside. We have reset our long equity scalpers in RTY and ES.
  • The liquidity models overrode the EWP technical wave action analysis -- looking for fundamental equity support from rising Treasury Cash Balance, Bank Reserves, and SOMA Transactions near-term.
  • Short-tern outlook of rising yields get support from rising bond term premia and breakevens but the onset of seasonal liquidity drought which lasts till late March is just days away.
  • If Debt Issuance (Total Debt) falls, Treasury Cash Balance also falls in nominal amounts. It does not mean that Bank Reserves will rise in terms of nominal amount -- it will only rise percentage-wise or ratio-wise to TCB. Bank Reserves and TCB have Yin-Yang relationship, but they are not directly inverse. Bank Reserves will fall too in nominal amounts. BR is not created ab nihilo -- it comes as a consequence of debt issuance and Fed monetizing that debt. If you lessen issuance, then nominally Bank Reserves will fall too. Its only the RATIO or PERCENTAGE of BR over TCB which will rise.
  • The Debt Issuance and long term yield covariance flipped in 2003. Prior to September 2003, the correlation between yields and debt issuance was somewhat positive -- that flipped on Sept 2003. From that point on, the covariance between issuance and long term rates became negative. That negative covariance was further enhanced by the QE effect of dampened rates on more money from Treasury and Fed liquidity. We should see long term rates RISING with LESS issuance. The liquidity transmission is through the Treasury Cash Balance, but TCB impact on yields lags behind by one quarter, so often hard to discern.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the latest performance of PAM's One-Contract Portfolio, with a margin capital of $100,000, making the same trades as the flagship Swing Fund, but doing consistent, one contract-trades.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is the current status of the PAM flagship Swing Fund, which includes open and closed trades.

During the twelve months of 2020, PAM delivered phenomenal real-dollar Hedge Fund trading performance, the best at Seeking Alpha:

PAM's flagship Swing Portfolio, year-to-date (December 31, 2020) delivered $100, 181,522.77 net profit on $11,172,813 margin capital.

Year-to-date performance: 860.27%, on 888-98 win-loss trades.

January 2021 spreadsheet here:

Year to date 2020 spreadsheet here.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RM13Feb 2, 2021 3:04 PM

I want to see the board's response to this - this affects TCB if true -

Treasury Now Projects Borrowing $900 Billion Less This Quarter: What That Means For Markets

Some $900 billion in very "bullish" reserves are about to enter the market.

Will we get a 600 mil stimulus or 1,900 mil one? How much issuance has to happen if last one is enacted?

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 3:58 PM

Looks familiar.

RM13Feb 2, 2021 4:16 PM

I look for the degree of disdain to the possibility of corrections in comments. I find that when a) everyone makes fun of that possibility, b) almost everyone states that corrections will not happen again, they happen... Degree of comments suggests we are getting close.. Those who said that social media had no value are clearly wrong

bogeygolfFeb 2, 2021 4:05 PM

https://twitter.com/Mephisto731/status/1356372380898230274

r/wsb had their day. They should cut and go but of course most won't. Every battle now will be a smaller rerun of this, and will be lost, because weekly call options on low float names will be vol++ for the foreseeable. Everyone's remodelled the right tail already. It's gone.

6/n

— MultifractelFarol (@Mephisto731) February 1, 2021

plavacFeb 2, 2021 4:36 PM

"What are the market implications of all this? Well, as Treasury cash balances plunge, banks will see their reserve levels soar by roughly $900 billion this quarter, a move that will lead to significant risk asset upside if previous instances of reserves growth are any indication."

Robert, Zerohedge expects the stock market to rise further this quarter and we expect the stock market to fall

flamarkFeb 2, 2021 4:41 PM

With RTY weakening relative to YM , I'm going to be curious what you choose for your short candidate.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 4:56 PM

Both YM and RTY mark

RM13Feb 2, 2021 5:01 PM

Will we get a 600 mil stimulus or 1,900 mil one? How much treasury issuance has to happen if last one is enacted? just looking at these possibilities. TCB is about 2,600 mil, so there is no real need for more issuance - but would Treasury do so, to grease the financial system?

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 5:07 PM

plavac --- ZeroHedge is stupid. -- when Debt Issuance (Total Debt) falls Treasury Cash Balance falls in nominal amounts. It does not mean that Bank Reserves will rise in nominal amount -- it will only rise percentage-wise or ratio-wise to TCB. Bank Reserves and TCB have Yin-Yang relationship, but they are not directly inverse. Bank Reserves will fall too in nominal amounts. BR is not created ab nihilo -- it comes as a consequence of debt issuance. If you lessen issuance, then nominally Bank Reserves will fall too. Its only the RATIO or PERCENTAGE of BR over TCB which will rise in the asset-liability composition of the Fed balance sheet (see chart below).

artbriskFeb 2, 2021 5:14 PM

BR are not created ab nihilo – they come when the Fed monetises the debt issuance (SOMA) and the Treasury spends its TCB (thus money flowing into private sector/banks?

robert.p.balanFeb 4, 2021 1:00 PM

That's the exact sequence artbrisk

plavacFeb 2, 2021 5:10 PM

Thank you Robert

RM13Feb 2, 2021 5:15 PM

What do lower levels of issuance mean for a) yields and b) dollar?

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 5:19 PM

Smaller issuance, smaller TCB. Here is the effect of TCB on the yield.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 5:20 PM

Lower issuance -- stronger US Dollar. let me go look for that dang chart.

RM13Feb 2, 2021 5:21 PM

Thank you, wanted to hear it from the master... Lower issuance would cause problems for equities too.. It's lining up..

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 5:23 PM

Yes Rafa because that means smaller bank reserves.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 5:38 PM

Here is the dang chart. DXY (green line) is inverted in the chart.

crowfeverFeb 2, 2021 5:35 PM

Robert any new target in mind for DX?

RM13Feb 2, 2021 5:39 PM

Robert, too many are short dollar right now.. Unless uber stimulus forces large issuance, dollar will move up...

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 5:40 PM

Crow -- if the Biden government cuts debt issuance by a fourth, at least 120 in the DXY.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 5:56 PM

plavac -- OK here it is.

The growth of Debt Issuance, Fed's Balance Sheet, Bank Reserves, and Treasury Cash Balance is countercyclical.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 5:57 PM

TCB and Bank Reserves grow only when debt issuance and Fed balance sheet are growing. As @artbrisk noted, BRs are created when the Fed monetizes the debt issuance, and the TCBs is disbursed to recipients via commercial banks.

centexlifeFeb 2, 2021 5:58 PM

Must not forget that the next round of Stimulus may not include direct payments, may only include unemployment extensions, and may focus on programs to stimulate employment deemphasizing stimulating Wall Street. Time period March ~ May. Such were the discussions yesterday at Hedgeye with Danielle DiMartino Booth. No apatite remains for direct payment as those past payments did not stimulate employment. The last stimulus spent within 10 days per Treasury (paying off credit cards, option plays on Robinhood ... ).

RM13Feb 3, 2021 5:50 AM

For the link to discussion, it's always entertaining - Hedgeye Risk Management | WEBCAST | McCullough & DiMartino Booth: America's House Of Cards

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 5:59 PM

If we have growth in Q3, there will be less issuance .. anyway there is still circa $1.594 trillion cash in the TCB -- hence the announcement that they will issue less debt makes sense.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderFeb 2, 2021 6:08 PM

My turn to ask -- if there is less debt issuance, what happens to bond yields?

john.derFeb 2, 2021 6:16 PM

Goes down

RM13Feb 3, 2021 5:52 AM

Agree, yields go down..

robert.p.balanFeb 4, 2021 1:40 PM

Actually a tough call. because of a persistent market meme about nominal supply level of issuance determining the level of rates -- but actually, the intrinsic, long term covariance between debt issuance and long bond yield is negative (see chart below).

You can so see the long term relationship in this LT chart with GDP (chart below).  More debt issuance, higher growth -- and lower long term rates.  

Actually the covariance flipped in 2003. Prior to September 2003, the correlation between yields and debt issuance was somewhat positive sometimes -- but that decisively flipped on Sept 2003. From that point on, the covariance between issuance and long term rates became negative.

That negative covariance was further enhanced by the QE effect of dampened rates on more money from Treasury and Fed liquidity. We should see long term rates RISING with LESS issuance (see chart below). The liquidity transmission is through the TCB, but the impact lags behind by one quarter, so often hard to discern.

If that lagged effect is still valid, we should see a yield decline first (from here), before a rise in yields -- making it appear that there is a positive covariance between debt issuance and bond yields. But the lagged effect of slower debt issuance will show up in early Q3 2020.

We did some extensive discussion on this, and other stuff in a recent article in PAM's Seeking Alpha blog -- Stuff That We As Investors, Should Know; It's Not Conventional Economics, But What The Heck

Alan.LongbonFeb 2, 2021 6:08 PM

You can sort of work out how much "debt" issuance there will be and also how much of it will be bought up by the Fed. In a perfect scenario, the mainstream Washington consensus is that the Fedgov issues debt and it is all bought up by the private sector as an asset swap, the Fed buys none of it and it looks like the Fedgov is borrowing from the public.

There are some fixed private buyers of treasuries and that is the recipients of export income from the USA who are forced to either sit in cash or buy treasuries for some income. That is about $50B per month or $500B per year.

Whatever is issued over that amount is either bought by the US private sector or failing a buyer it is bought up by the Fed as a last resort. In the UK for example, just about all the new debt is bought up by the Central Bank as there is no other alternative. So if Biden spends $1.9T in one year, $500B will be bought by the USA's export partners and the rest will have to be bought by the private sector and if that is not large enough the Fed will have to step in and buy it whether they want/plan to or not.

And as RB points out above, chances are they plan to spend the contents of the TCB and bring that down to a "normal" level of $200B to $400B. The way the system is wired one cannot spend and not buy treasuries at the end of the day if the Fed is to maintain its target interest rate. Fedgov spending has a one-month knock-on effect on markets

TimK123Feb 2, 2021 6:09 PM

Good discussion. Being fairly unknowledgeable I found this helpful to explain what might happen:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-30/treasury-market-set-for-a-respite-from-record-supply-onslaught

“Treasury will keep everything steady this meeting, using it as an opportunity to take stock of things,” said Priya Misra, head of global rates strategy at TD Securities. “They came into the year over-funded and need to bring the cash balance down anyway. Treasury also wants to keep their flexibility as there could be $1 trillion more in stimulus, or no more at all.”

FEBRUARY 3, 2021

GOOD MORNING EUROPE / GOOD EVENING WEST COAST

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 3, 2021 9:13 AM

It looks like we will still see that yield rally to 1.15.

That allows a completion of five wave sequence from Monday Asian low in the indices.

It also means NQ will probably make a new higher high. And that dims the prospects that we are looking at a Wave 2 framework in the equity indices.

bogeygolfFeb 3, 2021 2:42 PM

what caused bank credit (green) to tick higher?

robert.p.balanFeb 3, 2021 3:08 PM

The fed added to its balance sheet.

Our yield model still tells us we have at least another trading week of rising yields.

Therefore we resume scalping first small punts to the downside, and then bigger scalper bets on the way up.

What has surprised me (personally) is that given the outperformance of both AMZN and GOOGL, the NQ did not unleash a tsunami wave.

The models tells us yields should be higher, but we are now just left with Mr. Biden's stimmy initiative to goose up stocks higher. The problem with that is the issue has been discussed to death, the market has already internalized a large part of that news event, and if the final stimmy numbers disappoint, we will initiate a pullback.

Moreover, the GameStop saga has sensitized Hedge Funds and CTAS so much that these mini-MOTUs now scramble to delever/degross at the faintest whisper of possible short squeeze engineered by the Reddit meme traders.

If most of the good news has been more than priced in (for instance, the market has internalized a 1.2Trillion stimmy bill at least) -- what happens if we get some bad news? Like a $900 billion stimmy bill -- which does not leave much powder for another set of short squeezes?

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 3, 2021 9:52 AM

Of course, the market can rise further on sheer momentum, and that is what we probably have to rely on. Slim underpinnings, but we will be extra careful (but not too very careful -- that is how we missed part of this humongous rally).

However, time is running out in this bull market phase. The change rage of the aggregated global central banks balance sheets has keeled nine months ago, and the ensuing global liquidity drought will hit the global markets in a few days. There will be a revaluation lower of global risk assets until May, if our calibration of the model is correct.

G5 (US,EU,JPN,CHI,CHF) central bank balance sheets (US$) vs Volatility Indexes

There's negative comovement between Volatility vs central bank provided systemic liquidity.

Based on this measure, the Crude oil vol OVX is too low -- oil price is too high. There should be a repricing lower in crude oil prices, very soon.

RM13Feb 3, 2021 3:52 PM

That's a very good observation Robert... In past 2 spikes in OVX, OVX bottomed at about 32-33 region.. I haven't looked when does the spike in OVX co-align with oil sell off..

FEBRUARY 4, 2021

GOOD AFTERNOON ASIA / GOOD EVENING WEST COAST

kiraninvestorFeb 4, 2021 3:37 AM

robert.p.balan The read only Trade Summaries channel does not have any trades posted for this week. Is that correct

khiem.trungFeb 4, 2021 5:09 AM

there is trade summary here too: SWING Portfolio: Open Trades

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 6:10 AM

That's right KI - no trades done this week.

We are seeing some divergence between yields and equity futures today.

Yields are still rising, as expected . . .

But equity futures are falling in varying degrees.

If you look closely into the current behavior of yields vis-a-vis the current performance of the Treasury Cash Balance, we should be seeing a two day pullback from yields (pm NY close basis).So its likely that we will see equities pulling back some more.

But the current TCB also has risen for two days after that pullback and has not shown topping behavior so far. So we may have a two day pullback in equities, and then at least two days of rally thereafter. That's what the 2021 TCB behavior is providing us so far -- in the case of yields.

There are of course two issues to watch -- (1) that the yield will continue to mimic the 2021 TCB moves on a lagged basis, and (2) more crucially, equities will continue to follow the lead of yields.

And so far equities have been falling and may do so for another day or so.

If I may illustrate those possibilities, this may be what to expect from, say, YMH1. I won't preclude a longer +C+ wave tail.

So we are looking to scalp to the upside -- the downside potential seems small, But that should not stop you from shorting if you are nimble. We are not, as we have to consider the tail-end effect of our trade decisions on the much larger Joint Acct fund and other PAM funds. 

We see the same broad strokes of equities in the aggregate model above. Optimal top is 5 to 6 trading days from today.

spitzbubchenFeb 4, 2021 6:17 AM

GC is now below 1830. Any plans to drop the 1833 hedge?

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 7:05 AM

The covariances of the major assets have become aligned again -- so rising yields may see rising equities and rising gold, and falling VIX and DXY.

spitzbubchen -- we may see more declines in gold if equities fall some more. So yes, we will exit the short hedges, but also allowing for more declines in GC due to more silver declines.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 7:18 AM

See u later at Europe opening.

The covariances of the major assets have become aligned again -- so rising yields may see rising equities and rising gold, and falling VIX and DXY.

gwizz1Feb 4, 2021 9:28 AM

DXY inverse correlation broke with equities, are you saying that it’s now correlated again robert.p.balan ?

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 11:06 AM

Unless the chart is lying, yes. Remember, these are reckoned on NY close to NY close basis.

h.jabs Feb 4, 2021 10:03 AM

Rising Inflation Will Force the Fed's Hand

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 11:54 AM

h.jabs -- Commodity inflation is the best forecaster -- ISM surveys only look at the next 6 months. Commodity inflation, as well as changes in Money Velocity, lead ACTUAL CPI inflation (Headline, Core) by 6 quarters.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 11:55 AM

We should see another severe bout of deflation from early Q3 to late Q4 2021.

That means the bond term premium and breakevens will fall as in a waterfall (bringing bond yields lower, and yield spreads flatter).

RM13Feb 4, 2021 2:24 PM

That's in line with another economic data gathering fin tech, significant fall off in pricing pressures and postitive economic data at the start of Q3.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 2:04 PM

*Yields starting to move higher -- equities are rising in response. Lets put in some small scalpers in RTY and in ES.*

all PAM BUYS 144 CONTRACTS EACH IN RTYH1 AND ESH1, XXX DISCRETION -- ALL FUNDS

*RTYH1 -- DONE AT 2155.25 --- BOUGHT 144 CONTRACTS OF RTYH1 SCALPERS FOR ALL FUNDS*

*ESH1 -- DONE AT 3830 --- BOUGHT 144 CONTRACTS OF ESH1 SCALPERS -- FOR ALL FUNDS*

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 5:47 PM

This looks overdone -- trail stop are in for the Long RTY

all PAM PUTS A TRAIL STOP FOR THE RTYH1 -- SELL 144 CONTRACTS AT DOWNWARD BREACH OF 2185 OR AT 2199 LIMIT OR BETTER, OCO -- ALL FUNDS

We should see a pullback in yields -- that allows us to reset long RTY after a pullback as well.

all PAM PUTS A TRAIL STOP FOR THE ESH1 -- SELL 144 CONTRACTS AT DOWNWARD BREACH OF 3885 OR AT 3852 LIMIT OR BETTER, OCO -- ALL FUNDS

Please revise the ES trail stop thresholds to 3843 downside and 3854 upside -- for all funds. That equates to the RTY moves.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 6:32 PM

PAM PUTS A TRAIL STOP FOR THE RTYH1 -- SELL 144 CONTRACTS AT DOWNWARD BREACH OF 2185 OR AT 2199 LIMIT OR BETTER, OCO

*This order was filled.*

*RTYH1 -- DONE AT 2199 SOLD 144 CONTRACTS RTYH1 TO EXIT LONG SCALPERS -- FOR ALL FUNDS*

Please revise the ES trail stop thresholds to 3843 downside and 3854 upside -- for all funds. That equates to the RTY moves.

*This order was filled.*

*ESH1 -- DONE AT 3854.30 SOLD 144 CONTRACTS ESH1 TO EXIT LONG SCALPERS -- FOR ALL FUNDS*

That was some pretty neat, quick bucks -- let^s do it again, at further pullbacks in the yield.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 8:14 PM

I am bubbly because that was awesome -- half a mil in less than 3 hours of waiting (not even work). I will do it again -- this time, bigger if we get the right level.

centexlifeFeb 4, 2021 8:16 PM

See, I can't do heart kisses on RB's face ... I am not certain what that would express.

zak.kFeb 4, 2021 8:28 PM

"I will do it again -- this time, bigger if we get the right level." - Amen

flytightFeb 4, 2021 8:24 PM

robert.p.balan Nicely done Robert. I realize only three, but TD and Fidelity have both pulled margin money from I believe all accounts due to volatility. That might explain things.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 8:29 PM

If yield do this above, RTY might do this below-

10xx6dbFeb 4, 2021 8:29 PM

Thank you Robert. I made money on the ES trade. I missed the RTY trade and didn'n want to chase it. I am sorry I didn't. For now I trade only 1 contract so that was a nice,

Quick $1000.

Scott007Feb 4, 2021 8:31 PM

with you all the way RB

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 8:32 PM

Lets do that everyday at $1000, 10xx -- and you will perform as well as the one contract fund (which by the way, will be going live -- I will explain over the weekend how that goes).

One-Contract Portfolio: Open/Close Trades_January 2021 - Google Drive

flytightFeb 4, 2021 8:48 PM

robert.p.balan Somehow I missed the introduction of this approach, but I am most interested in doing this. I will watch for your document this weekend RB.

10xx6dbFeb 4, 2021 8:50 PM

Robert, With $100,000 margin capital, how much profit on the books would be required to make it sensible to increase trades from one contract to two contracts.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 8:51 PM

How long you've been with us 10xx?

flytight -- we publish the intro on Jan 4.

Introducing The PAM One-Contract Trade Tracker

10xx6dbFeb 4, 2021 8:59 PM

August 2020. I started trading just recently.

flytightFeb 4, 2021 8:59 PM

robert.p.balan Thank you so much Robert. I definitely missed that, but will get on the bandwagon for sure.

stecbeckFeb 4, 2021 9:02 PM

I missed the writeup also

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 9:08 PM

Wow, that's a long incubation period, 10xx. My admiration -- that means you know us (PAM, community) by now, warts and all. Its not the amount of margin capital (although that is a requisite) but the discipline, not to succumb to overtrading.

Do not emulate us -- there was one stretch in December when we have to make sure we will have a good 2020 number -- so I was sleeping just 5 hours a day, and turning over huge blocks of trades. Definitely do not do that. We have the skill set to make that happen and get the right results, and we have XXX's explicit backing to do it.

Now we are back to 144 contracts. Pretty normal again because now we know the $100 million 2020 performance will keep. For you, take it easy first, build up your capital -- once you have enough things will become exponential. I have seen enough retail trading and it seems survival in this game needs at least $1 million margin capital.

If you don't have that much, build it up first, slowly. As you can see. even a one contract trade strategy will build quickly with our quick in and out, then back again for more, trading style. Profit compounding will build your margin capital stake exponentially.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 10:39 PM

Dang -- ES caught a bid at the close -- I was hoping it would happen in early Asia.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 10:40 PM

This is how TimKiser and I are visualizing the path of ES towards completing a five-wave sequen

TimK123Feb 5, 2021 12:09 AM

Looks good.

TimK123Feb 5, 2021 3:07 AM

Elliott wave is awesome when there's a clear pattern imho.

robert.p.balanModeratorLeaderOwnerFeb 4, 2021 10:50 PM

GN everyone. I will see you in Asian trade.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.