Why isn't SA publishing the Needham response, part 1&2, to Copperfield???
Seeking Alpha Analyst Since 2011
Where is the fairness, Seeking Alpha??? Why haven't you published the Needham response to the hit piece that SA published, from "Copperfield," the hitter that SA promotes and protects!
My opinion, SA's agenda is to hit and run, and create an unfair marketplace. It is very easy to trash a company during a quarterly earnings quite period, and never reveal a source, and influencing markets so negatively. Why wouldn't you report both sides, SA? Do you have an agenda? Are you paid to do so? Do you profit from the hit peices you publish? Has the SEC ever looked into your activity?
I plan to ask many questions, to SA, and to governing bodies. We'll see where this goes.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.