Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Buy And Hold — Good Or Bad?

Jan. 13, 2014 6:03 PM ET
Thomsett profile picture
Thomsett's Blog
Please Note: Blog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors.

Seeking Alpha Analyst Since 2011

Michael C. Thomsett is a widely published options author. His "Getting Started in Options" (Wiley, 9th edition) has sold over 300,000 copies. He also is author of "Options Trading for the Conservative Investor" and "The Options Trading Body of Knowledge" (both FT Press); and "Options for Risk-Free Portfolios" and "Options for Swing Trading" (both Palgrave Macmillan). Thomsett also writes for www.TheStreet.com and the StockCharts.com Top Advisor Corner 

The traditional "buy-and-hold" approach to investing is rapidly falling out of favor. To a degree, the Internet combined with dirt-cheap trading fees is to blame, but something else appears to be going on, too. Increased volatility in the past decade certainly has contributed to the rise of short-term trading and the decline in long-term investing.

The growing popularity of active trading (day trading and swing trading) is also part of this dramatic change. At the height of holding periods (between 1940 and 1945), the average time securities were held ranged as high as 10 years. This has steadily declined over the years. By 1975-80, the period was cut in half to six years or less. And then the average period declined dramatically. Currently, the average holding period is under one year. (SG Global Strategy Research, cited by Henry Blodget, You're An Investor? How Quaint, in BusinessInsider.com, August 8, 2009)

Does this mean that approaches to investing and trading have changed due to outside influences, or is the perfection different today? Many financial advisers have also abandoned the old-style buy-and-hold strategy and, in fact, value investing itself, and today seem to advocate not only short-term holds, but broader mixes of assets. These include ETFs over mutual funds, bond and commodity funds or index pools, and a range of stock swing trades based in daily changes rather than monthly or annual changes. Advisers also seek strategies responsive to ever-changing levels of volatility, with little interest in finding long-term buy-and-hold candidates.

It makes a degree of sense. About 20 to 25 years ago, the most popular blue chip investments included companies like GM and Kodak, and there were no Internet companies at all; they simply did not exist. Today, the idea of believing in a long-term hold of two to three decades out is troubling because the world has changed and continues to accelerate. This means that many products (like guzzler cars and film-based cameras) are likely to become obsolete in the near future. A popular modern strategy is to keep a majority of funds in short-term debt securities, cash or precious metals (gold and silver, most often). Also popular in this new world of trading are leveraged ETFs, both bullish and bearish.

More traders and advisers today shun holds even of six to 12 months, and prefer daily monitoring and trading as a means for riding volatility. Do these active traders out-perform the buy-and-hold approach? This depends on the choices made and the level of market risk in the specific products chosen, not to mention timing. An active trader using commodity funds or metals-based pools like GLD and SLV are likely to ride bullish waves as well as crash quickly in bearish retracements. In comparison, limiting activity to other sectors can produce a variety of outcomes. Now that average holding periods are under one year, it will be matter of time before anyone will know whether active trading out-performs buy-and-hold.

To gain more perspective on insights to investing observations and specific analysis, I hope you will join me at ThomsettStocks.com where I publish many additional articles. I also maintain a virtual portfolio of stock at ThomsettStocks.com. For new trades, I usually include a stock chart marked up with reversal and confirmation, and provide detailed explanations of my rationale. Link to the site to learn more.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.