EU opens in-depth investigation into Microsoft's planned $69B acquisition of Activision (update)
David Ramos
The European Commission said on Tuesday it was opening an in-depth investigation into Microsoft's (NASDAQ:MSFT) planned $69B acquisition of Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI) on fears that the deal may "significantly reduce competition."
In a statement, the Commission said concerns have cropped up that the deal would lessen competition in a number of markets, including console and PC games, subscription and cloud game streaming services, as well as for PC operating systems.
"In particular, the Commission is concerned that, by acquiring Activision Blizzard, Microsoft may foreclose access to Activision Blizzard's console and PC video games, especially to high-profile and highly successful games (so-called ‘AAA' games) such as Call of Duty," the statement read.
The announcement comes as no surprise, as the deadline to open an in-depth investigation was today.
In a letter to employees on Tuesday, Activision Blizzard (ATVI) CEO Bobby Kotick said the company would continue to work with the European Commission, as well as work with Microsoft (MSFT) to engage with regulators in other countries as they perform their reviews.
On Monday, Kotick said the sale remains on track to close in the quarter ending in June.
"We continue to expect that our transaction will close in Microsoft’s current fiscal year ending June 2023," Kotick said in a statement in conjunction with the video game maker's third-quarter results.
Microsoft (MSFT) shares rose 1.5% in early Tuesday trading, while Activision Blizzard (ATVI) rose nearly 1.8% to $72.36, well below the $95-per-share cash offer from Microsoft.
Separately on Tuesday, Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) CEO Strauss Zelnick said he had no issues with the Microsoft's (MSFT) planned $69B purchase of Activision (ATVI) and that most of his competitors feel the same way.
Recommended For You
Comments (39)
Have a tip? Submit confidentially to our News team. Found a factual error? Report here.




Are you postive on any company at all? Comment on merger:
Unbelievable people actually think this is going to close.
Is it an absolute monopoly? No. Is it monopolistic? Every single one of these ‘experts’ failed their history 101 courses. Hard.
Seriously. I have the retort none of these laughable “but it’s fine” arguments can counter.
Standard. Freaking. Oil.
Standard Oil was, without question, a monopoly. Which was built on - you guessed it kiddos - vertical integration. They started with oil, because, duh. Oil. They then bought up smaller, competing refineries - but not nearly all of them, or even their largest competitors. They just bought good, productive companies.
Then they bought or developed companies to package, commoditize, market, and sell the oil. And as these companies grew to control the market, they simply stopped refusing to sell anyone else’s products. And Standard Oil refused to sell the raw materials to anyone but these vertical integrations.
Transporting the oil from the well to the loading station, that was a problem. One they didn’t want to pay someone else to handle, because there was money to be made. So they started building pipelines. Pipelines aren’t oil drilling or selling! Yep, vertical integration.
->More

Which controls 90%+ market share of pc gaming I think - so you're whole argument is irrelevant. Software is luckily still independent of OS. Also, games can easily be created and distributed which you can see in recent Indie game successes.




National Security?
No donations to Democracy?




