Gazprom's Recent Deals Should Be a Red Flag to the Rest of Europe 14 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
In potentially ominous news, Gazprom has entered an agreement with Azeri national energy company SOCAR to purchase Azeri gas at a price of $350/thousand cubic meters. Initial volumes of 500 mcm for 2010 are modest, but Gazprom is allegedly to be a preferential buyer (whatever that means) for gas from the second stage of the immense Shan Deniz field.
The price in the deal is very interesting, given that Gazprom (OGZPY.PK) is balking at paying the same price from Turkmenistan (admittedly the Azeri gas is closer to market, and should receive something of a premium). Indeed, recent reports tend to confirm my initial conclusion that the gas pipeline “explosion” in Turkmenistan was just a consequence of the Russian reneging on its contract to buy gas at $345 from the Turkmen, a price that seemed like a good deal at the time, but which looks very rich given the current market:
Gazprom wants Ashgabat to reduce either the price or the volume of Turkmen gas delivered to Russia; or some combination of the two reductions. In either case, Turkmenistan’s national income (based almost entirely on gas exports) would be severely hit.
Russia’s prolonged stoppage puts Ashgabat under growing pressure to re-negotiate the existing agreements. High-level Russian delegations have been descending on Ashgabat almost on a weekly basis recently. During June, for example, Russian First Deputy Prime Minister and concurrently Gazprom Chairman Viktor Zubkov, Gazprom CEO Aleksei Miller, and the company’s vice-president and Gazexport Director-General Aleksandr Medvedev, held talks one after the other in Ashgabat with President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov and other Turkmen officials (Interfax, June 3, 14, 19, 21, 24).
Moscow apparently feels that it has the upper hand and can continue the import stoppage as long as necessary. On the occasion of Gazprom shareholders’ annual meeting, just held in Moscow, Medvedev simply recommended to “wait and see how the talks proceed” with Turkmenistan. More to the point, Miller indicated to the press that Ashgabat has no alternative option for export or swap operations until the Turkmenistan-China pipeline comes on stream (Interfax, June 26).
Ashgabat is intensifying its contacts with the European Union, European companies, and the United States in search of export diversification options for the future. Meanwhile, China provides the first alternative option at hand.
It must be particularly irksome to Turkmenistan that at the same time Gazprom is stiffing it by saying that $345 is too high a price, and that it doesn’t need all the gas it contracted for, it is running off to Azerbaijan to enter into a deal to buy additional volumes at $350. Square that circle, dudes.
Presumably the wily Azeri President Ilham Aliyev is well aware of Gazprom’s practices, and is watching Gazprom’s heavy-handedness with Turkmenistan carefully. So why would he deal with this devil? Perhaps this is wishful thinking on my part, but what would make sense is that Aliyev is losing patience with European dithering over Nabucco. By showing a willingness to deal with Gazprom, he is sending a shot across the bow of the EUnuchs, letting them know with actions rather than words that they need to move sooner rather than later or Nabucco is going to turn into a, well, pipe dream.
Will the Europeans get it through their thick skulls? I highly doubt it. They are so divided–with Russia and Gazprom merrily promoting and exploiting those divisions–that they will be mightily pressed to get their act together soon. If they don’t, Azerbaijan may figure that it has no real alternative but Gazprom. And what a pity that would be.
In other gas news, as I wrote in a sarcastic piece earlier, Gazprom and Nigeria have entered a joint venture. Responding to the inflammatory choice of a name for the venture, one Nigerian said: ”White people are making too much of this. As long as the Russians pay us, they can call it what they like.”
But that’s the rub. ”As long as the Russians pay us.” That’s a big if, especially considering Gazprom’s cash flow problems (requiring an 85 percent dividend cut and a 50 percent cut in capex), and its hugely expensive commitments on core strategic projects North Stream and South Stream, plus its need to develop new reserves in Russia to replace its declining fields. Where’s the money going to come from?
Now, it seems nigh on to impossible that Gazprom can finance its commitment in the Nigaz venture along with all its other needs in these straitened times. So “pay us” is unlikely to mean “pay us over the table to invest in the joint venture.” But, given that it is Russia and Nigeria that we are talking about here, “pay us” could mean payments under the table–payments European and American companies would have a difficult time matching (and would certainly incur more risk to match). These payments would be intended to keep the Nigerian gas from going to Europe. Under the table payoffs to stymie development of gas could be much more profitable to the powers that be in Nigeria than legitimate investments to spur their development.
Regardless of whether one takes the JV at face value–a sincere Russian effort to develop additional gas supplies–or treats it more cynically–as just another in a long line of Gazprom efforts to keep potentially competitive sources of gas offline–it should be another red flag to the Europeans. Yet another warning that Russia is aggressively pursuing a strategy to restrict the competition it faces in the European market. (Which is why nobody in their right mind should expect Russian help in Iran–the possessor of the 2nd largest gas reserves in the world, now largely unavailable due to Iran’s oh-so-convenient pariah status.)
Do the Europeans get it? Do they understand the significance of the Azeri-Russian deal? I wish I could say yes. But although Europe yammers on about diversifying its gas sources, its actions belie its words. Pretty soon, it won’t have any actions available to it, except to go hat in hand to Moscow. They will have no one to blame but themselves.
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication in the last week
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Those with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last week
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,
as ranked by their peers-
1
User 353732
-
2
Moon Kil Woong
-
3
optionsgirl
-
4
doubleguns
-
5
Mayascribe
Top Commenters » -
1
-
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most activeSee all
Instabloggers.
Top Instabloggers » -
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
Buy a boxed version of Microsoft Windows in New York, then London and then look us in eye and call the Russians cheats and liars.
On Jul 02 02:59 PM Larry House wrote:
> Very interesting. We have had indications already that Russia will
> hold Europe hostage whenever she can. Why shake down just one country
> at a time?
www.forbes.com/2009/06...
The credit crunch has Russia rethinking its hardball energy stance
I don't think the Russians are going to withhold any more gas from Europe, it NEEDS the cash flow
Russia starting to wake up to the global energy game which requires capital and expertise, not just vast resources
On Jul 02 02:59 PM Larry House wrote:
> Very interesting. We have had indications already that Russia will
> hold Europe hostage whenever she can. Why shake down just one country
> at a time?
Well, the vacation is over. It is back to the treadmill.
So let's just forget Europe in the equasion. Why is Russia which has more oil than it can use shopping to get more? Russia seems to have the desire to become it's own sort of mid-East OPEC without all the bickering (a monopoly not an oligopoly). they have Europe and Chinas appitite for the black stuff seems only to be growing. Over in the east they have been playing off China with Japan over a pipeline for years now. They too are learning Russia's contract commitments mean nothing.
Russia's contracts more often than not merely mean they honor them when it's there best interest and revoke them when they can get a better deal or don't want them any more. What do you expect. Gazprom is state run. It's founder is in jail due to the exact type of crooked political dealing which anyone negotiating with Russia must deal with. This makes you wonder why you should make a deal with Russia at all. The answer is usualy, because 1) you have no choice or 2) they gave you an offer you can't refuse (although it is also probably too good to be true).
>its actions belie its words.
That does not square with the facts, LNG regas capacity is being built at record pace, every country from Italy to Poland is building a terminal. Europe very much knows it has to diversify and is doing so extremely fast. This summer Europe has taken record low levels of Russian gas - it does not need their gas at all. No wonder Gazprom is worried.
Germany is leading in behavig as Russia's lacqey while its ex Chancellor Schroeder has a well paid job in Moscow since he lost the elections and has been working for the Gazporm ever since. It is he who gave a one billion Euros present to Gazprom after he lost the elections. And nobody did anything!
The old albion is looking even more ripe for exploitation and decadent.
Wake up! people of Germany and Europe! or you will be tourist guides to the Chinese in the near future.
There are some countries you can trust to use their power for the good of mankind, others less so. The list of the former seems to be shrinking by the week.
On Jul 02 10:38 PM Moon Kil Woong wrote:
> Thanks for the article Craig Pirrong. Europe has always been reliant
> on others for fuel. This is much better than them doing things like
> getting it from Iraq after imposing sanctions on them with the US.
>
>
> So let's just forget Europe in the equasion. Why is Russia which
> has more oil than it can use shopping to get more? Russia seems to
> have the desire to become it's own sort of mid-East OPEC without
> all the bickering (a monopoly not an oligopoly). they have Europe
> and Chinas appitite for the black stuff seems only to be growing.
> Over in the east they have been playing off China with Japan over
> a pipeline for years now. They too are learning Russia's contract
> commitments mean nothing.
>
> Russia's contracts more often than not merely mean they honor them
> when it's there best interest and revoke them when they can get a
> better deal or don't want them any more. What do you expect. Gazprom
> is state run. It's founder is in jail due to the exact type of crooked
> political dealing which anyone negotiating with Russia must deal
> with. This makes you wonder why you should make a deal with Russia
> at all. The answer is usualy, because 1) you have no choice or 2)
> they gave you an offer you can't refuse (although it is also probably
> too good to be true).