Introduction
Edwards Lifesciences (NYSE:EW) describes itself this way:
... we continue to lead the field of tissue replacement heart valves and repair products and advanced hemodynamic monitoring, which have helped treat and manage more than 2 million patients worldwide.
EW was spun off by Baxter (BAX) 19 years ago with a lot of debt and uncertain prospects. As this chart compares EW with two major competitors and the S&P 500 (SPY), it has been discovered:
EW trades with about 2X the prices:sales ratio of Boston Scientific (BSX) and about 2.5X that of giant Medtronic (MDT). BSX and MDT are more broadly diversified than EW beyond cardiovascular ("CV") medicine. EW makes a point of saying that it wants to stay relatively non-diversified. The company's collaborations with now-famous doctor-researchers, such as Drs. Starr, Fogarty and Carpentier, have represented a "win-win-win" situation for the company, the co-inventors, and society at large. (See 2018 Annual Report for more background and photos.)
At $178, EW trades near 34X non-GAAP consensus EPS for 2019, thus putting it at close to a relative P/E of 2X the non-GAAP P/E for the SPY. Is this attractive? Can this niche field really allow enough predictable multi-year above-trend growth to justify this very high premium?
Let's look deeper.
A brief overview of operations
While EW operates in about 100 countries, 55% of revenues come from the US, with the great majority of the rest from the familiar EU/Japan axis. (See p. 24 of the 10-K for this and other statistics.) The rest of the world offers tantalizing growth prospects, both because of the many untreated degenerative valve diseases of aging, but because of the much greater prevalence there of rheumatic heart (valve) disease.
Sticking with developed countries, the bullish story about EW relates heavily to its growth opportunities with catheter-based treatment